View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Without CO2 fertilization, wheat yield in the 2050s would decrease 2.5%.
Treatmentwithout CO2 fertilization e1 Verbatim
e1 “In 2050s, wheat yield would increase 14.8% ( decrease 2.5% without CO2 fertilization) , and ET would decrease 2.1% under RCP4.5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–863 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit at S4 caused a relative yield decrease .
Organ / stagepod filling to early maturing (S4) e0 Outcomerelative decrease of yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The water deficit at early vegetative (S1) and pod filling to early maturing (S4) was sensitive to the relative decrease of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1318 t0 “Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–126 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.
OutcomeEnergy yield from gasification e1 Qualifierdid not decrease on a unit biomass basis e1 Verbatim
t0 “Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 e1 “Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The rate of wheat yield decrease is higher under full irrigation than under deficit irrigation.
Treatmentfull irrigation e0 Outcomedecrease rate of yield e0 Verbatim
e1 “impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 e0 “this decrease rate of yield is higher in full irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1223 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The screenhouse climate corresponded to a 50% decrease in cucumber fruit yield during spring/summer.
Outcomecrop fruit yield e0 Qualifierspring/summer period e0 Verbatim
e0 “These differences resulted in a 50% decrease in crop fruit yield during the spring/summer period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1356 t0 “Cucumber Fruit Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–49 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Super rice had more yield increase or less decrease under AWD than check rice.
Outcomemore increase or less decrease e0 Directionmore increase or less decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with more increase or less decrease for super rice than for check rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1172 Other claims from this paper (15) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall variability and rising temperatures explain the projected maize yield decrease at Bako and Melkassa
Treatmentrainfall variability and rising temperatures e3 SettingBako and Melkassa e3 Verbatim
e0 “maize yield s will decrease by up to 43 and 24% by the end of the century at Bako and Melkassa stations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1063 e3 “rainfall variability and rising temperatures are determining factors explaining yield decrease in Bako and Melkassa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1275 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario A1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass caused by weed competition.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass and reduce herbicide cost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation in the reproductive stage caused a greater decrease in soybean yield components.
Organ / stagereproductive stage e5 Outcomeyield components e5 Directiongreater decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soybean yield depends on photosynthesis generated by leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 e5 “defoliation has a negative effect on all cultivars yield components with greater decrease when it occurs in the reproductive stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1239 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.