View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
With overdominance, using the parental variety as tester will at least not decrease maize yield .
Treatmentparental variety e5 Verbatim
t0 “Synthetic Varieties of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 e5 “if the parental variety is used as tester the yield will at least not decline ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–786 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
PRV-based volume application did not decrease tomato yield .
Treatmentvolume application rate from the PRV e0 Directionwithout decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The calculation of the volume application rate from the PRV has resulted in a reduction of more than 30 % of the quantity of plant protection product sprayed, without decreasing yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–905 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Multiple cropping with chili did not decrease the growth and yield of shallot compared with monoculture.
Treatmentmultiple cropping system e1 Outcomegrowth and yield e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Comparatormonoculture system (shallot) e4 SettingSrigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District e5 Verbatim
e0 “The intensive application of synthetic/inorganic fertilizer on shallot cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 e1 “multiple cropping system did not decrease the growth and yield of shallot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1229 e4 “monoculture system (shallot) and multiple cropping system (shallot – chili) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1032 e5 “This research was conducted from August to November 2016 in Srigading Village, Sanden Sub-District, Bantul District ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–815 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low tunnels did not decrease pepper sunscald.
Treatmentlow tunnels for two weeks after transplanting e1 Directiondid not increase yield or decrease e0 Comparatorplants not grown under low tunnels e0 Verbatim
e0 “they did not increase yield or decrease sunscald compared to plants not grown under low tunnels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1304 e1 “plants grown under low tunnels for two weeks after transplanting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1187 t0 “Bell Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The observed ion uptake interactions did not decrease carnation yield across the concentrations studied.
Qualifierover the range of concentrations studied e0 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease d yield s, due to the interactions, were observed over the range of concentrations studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–799 e1 “Carnations ( Dianthus caryophyllus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The chickpea-induced decrease in water storage did not affect the yield of subsequent wheat.
Treatmentchickpea treatments e0 Outcomeyield of subsequent wheat e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Verbatim
e0 “The chickpea treatments decrease d SRS water storage at wheat planting by 14 to 16% compared with TF, but this did not affect yield of subsequent wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–738 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Biomass yield did not substantially decline across harvest frequencies.
Treatmentharvest frequency e0 Directiondid not substantially decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Although harvest frequency affected biomass yield , the yield did not substantially decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1195 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Turkey litter combined with bioplastic or polyethylene mulch did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.
Directionno significant decrease e4 Qualifierwhen combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch e4 Comparatorweed free control e4 Verbatim
e1 “replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891 e4 “There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Walnut shell combined with bioplastic or polyethylene mulch did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.
Directionno significant decrease e4 Qualifierwhen combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch e4 Comparatorweed free control e4 Verbatim
e1 “replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891 e4 “There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Continued application did not cause a notable decrease in yield over the three years examined.
Directionno_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e1 “収量までの検討は3年間であったが, 継続施用による収量等の低下は特に発生しなかった ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–411 e2 “育苗箱全量基肥施肥法によって継続して栽培を行い, 水稲の生育・収量の変動について検討した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.