View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield tended to decrease at 60 kg/ha sulphur.
Treatmenthigher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) the yield tended to decrease in potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–620 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed review summary no effect basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield .
Treatmentincreased IVDMD e6 Directionno_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e6 “Because increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield per se ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1278 t0 “Breeding for Increased Forage Nutritional Value ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d solar radiation decrease d simulated maize yield .
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in solar radiation and decrease carbondioxide concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1664 t0 “yield of rainfed maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Each approximately 1% decrease in chalkiness accompanied approximately 1% greater head rice yield .
Verbatim
e0 “for every ∼1% decrease in chalkiness, an increase of ∼1% in head rice yield follows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–499 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops showed no increase or a slight decrease in soybean seed yield in 2007 and 2009.
Directionno yield increase or slight yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 2007 and 2009 no yield increase or slight yield decrease was shown by the cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1264 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
Treatmentreducing plant density e0 Outcomeweekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Manioc yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
Settinghigher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield may decrease at higher rainfall.
Settinghigher rainfall levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “manioc and maize may decrease at higher rainfall levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–654 e1 “Crop yield s show no increase with rainfall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–592 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Flowering and pod formation had the greatest yield decrease after defoliation.
Organ / stageflowering and pods formation e0 Directionhighest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest decrease was detected for flowering and pods formation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–847 e1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–693 e2 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Goytacazes) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–262 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease is attributed to a later planting date.
Treatmentselection of a later planting date e4 Verbatim
e0 “on the yield of maize in the Azuero Region in Panama ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–168 e4 “yield decrease is related to the selection of a later planting date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1031 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.