View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-rice yield in the N and NP treatments decrease d significantly over time.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “Late-rice yield in treatments with N and NP significantly decrease (P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–516 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Every non-ploughing tillage treatment significantly reduced corn grain yield relative to ploughing.
Treatmentall variants of soil tillage e0 Outcomecorn grain yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “For all variants of soil tillage, compared to ploughing, there was a significant decrease in corn grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1915 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
yield significantly decrease d during harvest at each salinity level.
Organ / stageharvest period e0 Qualifierat each salinity level e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a significant decrease in both yield and CCI during the harvest period at each salinity level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1179 t0 “Tomato Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower seed yield decrease d as irrigation water decrease d.
Treatmentdecrease in applied irrigation water e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “growth parameter (biomass and seed yield ) decrease d with a decrease in applied irrigation water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1062 e1 “The statistical analysis showed significant differences in seed yield among the treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1372 t0 “Sunflower Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in the fruit branch staggered coefficient α1 decrease d the weight of leaves per unit seed cotton yield by 47.20% (P < 0.01).
Outcomeweight of leaves per unit seed cotton yield e1 Qualifierfruit branch staggered coefficient α1 decreased e1 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 e1 “fruit branch staggered coefficient α1 decrease d the weight of leaves per unit seed cotton yield by 47.20% (P < 0.01) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2089–2205 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Three crosses showed a significant decrease in oil-content inbreeding depression.
MaterialNP121 X RR 76, RL-28-1 X L-53 and AHUDEARA 170 X SJKO 05 e0 Outcomesignificant decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Linseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 e0 “Three crosses, NP121 X RR 76, RL-28-1 X L-53 and AHUDEARA 170 X SJKO 05. Showed significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1249 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Booting heat significantly decrease d amylopectin content; grain-filling heat did not show that decrease .
Outcomeamylopectin content e0 Verbatim
t0 “High-Quality Hybrid Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–124 e0 “Additionally, HT1 led to a significant decrease in amylopectin content, which was not observed under HT2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1438 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Worsening leaching water quality and quantity decrease d wheat yield .
Treatmentdecrease of leaching water quality and quantity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease of leaching water quality and quantity significantly increased soil and drainage water salinity and decrease d crop yield and evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–560 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–23 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P5HSC1 grain yield per plant decrease d 7.53% from P5C0.
Outcomegrain yield per plant e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize Populations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 e0 “significant decrease for 7.53% compare to that of P5C0 in grain yield per plant of P5HSC1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–487 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil compaction significantly decrease d yield in 2007.
Treatmentsoil compaction e0 Qualifierfirst year of the experiment (2007) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the first year of the experiment (2007), soil compaction caused a significant decrease in plant yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1165 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.