Paper · 2024 · UKRAINIAN BLACK SEA REGION AGRARIAN SCIENCE

Influence of primary tillage on some soil fertility indicators and corn yield

Serhii Dolia; Mykola Shevchenko

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cultivated soils are constantly under stress, in particular, from anthropogenic pressure due to their tillage. At the same time, climate change, moisture deficit, trends in crop rotation and improved crop tillage technologies encourage farmers to pay more attention to tillage systems. In addition, this element of technology plays a significant role in ensuring the sustainability of the entire agrophytocenosis. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of different tillage practices on certain soil fertility indicators and corn yield. The research was carried out in 2021-2023 at the Dokuchaevske Experimental Field of the State Biotechnological University, which is located in the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. The experimental design includes the study of different tillage methods: ploughing with PLN-4-35 at 25-27 cm (control); chisel local tillage with PC-2.5 at 33-35 cm; moldboardless tillage with PRN-31000 at 33-35 cm and discing with BDM-2.5 at 10-12 cm. The reaction of the soil to the main tillage in corn crops was determined through its main water and agrophysical parameters: moisture content, density and hardness. The results of the research showed that the condition of typical chernozem is almost the same after ploughing and moldboardless tillage with the PRN-31000 (“paraplough”). A slight increase in the density of the arable soil layer was found after the application of chisel and discing tillage. All tillage options created favourable conditions in the soil, as its hardness in the 0-20 cm soil layer was in the range of 13.3-15.1 kg/cm2. In corn crops, moisture reserves in the one-metre layer did not differ by tillage options. However, there was a tendency for its decrease in the variants with chisel and discing tillage compared to ploughing. For all variants of soil tillage, compared to ploughing, there was a significant decrease in corn grain yield. The practical significance of the results obtained is to optimise the regulation of water and physical properties of typical chernozem with the achievement of soil protection technologies and stabilisation of corn grain yields in the context of climate change and variability of modern production

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing and moldboardless tillage left typical chernozem in almost the same condition.

Treatment
moldboardless tillage with the PRN-31000 (“paraplough”)e0
Outcome
condition of typical chernozeme0
Direction
almost the samee0
Comparator
ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the condition of typical chernozem is almost the same after ploughing and moldboardless tillage with the PRN-31000 (“paraplough”).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage slightly increased arable soil density.

Treatment
chisele0
Outcome
density of the arable soil layere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A slight increase in the density of the arable soil layer was found after the application of chisel and discing tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Discing slightly increased arable soil density.

Treatment
discing tillagee0
Outcome
density of the arable soil layere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A slight increase in the density of the arable soil layer was found after the application of chisel and discing tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tillage options yielded soil hardness of 13.3-15.1 kg/cm2 in the 0-20 cm layer.

Outcome
hardnesse0
Value
13.3-15.1 kg/cm2e0
Qualifier
0-20 cm soil layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tillage options created favourable conditions in the soil, as its hardness in the 0-20 cm soil layer was in the range of 13.3-15.1 kg/cm2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-metre soil moisture reserves did not differ by tillage option.

Outcome
moisture reservese0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
one-metre layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In corn crops, moisture reserves in the one-metre layer did not differ by tillage options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage tended to lower soil moisture relative to ploughing.

Treatment
chisele0
Outcome
moisture reservese1
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a tendency for its decrease in the variants with chisel and discing tillage compared to ploughing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“In corn crops, moisture reserves in the one-metre layer did not differ by tillage options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Discing tended to lower soil moisture relative to ploughing.

Treatment
discing tillagee0
Outcome
moisture reservese1
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a tendency for its decrease in the variants with chisel and discing tillage compared to ploughing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“In corn crops, moisture reserves in the one-metre layer did not differ by tillage options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Every non-ploughing tillage treatment significantly reduced corn grain yield relative to ploughing.

Treatment
all variants of soil tillagee0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all variants of soil tillage, compared to ploughing, there was a significant decrease in corn grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1915 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.