Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MH75 caused no significant decrease in protein, GLI or GLU versus MH100.

Treatment
MH75e0
Outcome
protein content and the amount of GLI and GLUe0
Direction
did not cause a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
especially in the RT systeme0
Comparator
MH100e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the herbicide dose reduced by 25% (MH75) compared to the recommended dose (MH100), especially in the RT system, did not cause a significant decrease in protein content and the amount of GLI and GLU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1407
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–152

Title

The Effect of Tillage Systems and Weed Control Methods on Grain Yield and Gluten Protein Compositional and Content-Related Changes in Hybrid Bread Wheat

Jan Buczek Agriculture 2024. doi:10.3390/agriculture14091558

Other claims from this paper (12)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N content at each sampling and its rate of decrease showed no significant correlation with the optimum fertilizer N rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
content of N (%) in leaves at each samplinge2
Comparator
optimum rate of fertilizer Ne1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“required for winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76
e1

“the optimum rate of fertilizer N required for maximum grain yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–554
e2

“(i) content of N (%) in leaves at each sampling and its rate of decrease—no significant correlation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–747

Title

Prediction by leaf analysis of nitrogen fertilizer required for winter wheat

Thomas Batey Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1977. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740280310

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
RS narrowede1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
threee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“three had nonsignificant yield increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1087
e1

“one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32

Title

Row Spacing in the Early Soybean Production System

Glenn R. Bowers; James L. Rabb; Lanny O. Ashlock; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.923524x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The other seven recombinant strains produced no significant biomass increase or decrease at Hancock.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
seven other recombinant strainse0
Outcome
alfalfa biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no other significant increases or decreases in alfalfa biomass were observed with the seven other recombinant strains at that site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1786
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7

Title

Alfalfa yield response to inoculation with recombinant strains of Rhizobium meliloti with an extra copy of dctABD and/or modified nifA expression

A H Bosworth; M K Williams; K A Albrecht; et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1994. doi:10.1128/aem.60.10.3815-3832.1994

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated damage at one larva per two and a half feet did not significantly reduce seed cotton yield.

Treatment
1 larva/2½ feete0
Interactor
HeliothisHeliothist0pest
Outcome
yield of seed cottone0
Direction
did not cause a significant decreasee0
Comparator
undamaged checke0

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated larva damage at the level of 1 larva/5 feet and 1 larva/2½ feet did not cause a significant decrease in yield of seed cotton over the undamaged check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–324
t0

“Heliothis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63

Title

Effect on Cotton Yield of Various Levels of Simulated Heliothis Damage to Squares and Bolls12

R. T. Kincade; M. L. Laster; J. A. Brazzel Journal of Economic Entomology 1970. doi:10.1093/jee/63.2.613

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cacao yield changed by −10% without statistical significance during roof closure.

Treatment
roof closuree0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
−10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cacao yield (−10%) during roof closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–738

Title

Effects of an experimental drought on the functioning of a cacao agroforestry system, Sulawesi, Indonesia

LUITGARD SCHWENDENMANN; EDZO VELDKAMP; GERALD MOSER; et al. Global Change Biology 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02034.x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying only 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, with common or water soluble fertilizers through fertigation, did not significantly reduce onion bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
75% of the recommended NPK fertilizerse4
Outcome
bulb yielde4
Direction
did not significantly decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257
e4

“bulb yield did not significantly decrease by applying just 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, using common or water soluble fertilizers supplied through fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–844

Title

Effect of Microsprinkler Fertigation on Growth and Yield of Rabi Onion

M Prabhakar; S S Hebbar; A K Nair Journal of Horticultural Sciences 2011. doi:10.24154/jhs.v6i1.446

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCB did not significantly decrease SCN reproduction in strip trials.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CCBe1
Interactor
SCNe1peste0
Outcome
SCN reproductione2
Comparator
CMVe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but not in any of the strip trials in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–914
t0

“Soybean Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–102
e1

“Relative to the CMV treatment, CCB significantly decreased SCN reproductive factor in two small-plot experiments (one each in 2014 and 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–867
e2

“but not in any of the small-plot experiments, even when there were significant decreases in SCN reproduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1114

Title

Effects of Clariva Complete Beans Seed Treatment on Heterodera glycines Reproduction and Soybean Yield in Iowa

Kaitlyn M. Bissonnette; Christopher C. Marett; Mark P. Mullaney; et al. Plant Health Progress 2018. doi:10.1094/php-08-17-0043-rs

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.

Treatment
Nitrogent1
Outcome
effective paniclese0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510
t0

“Rice Shennong 265”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76
t1

“Nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change yield.

Taxon
fava bean cropVicia fabat0
Treatment
microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Comparator
non-inoculated crope0

Verbatim

e0

“microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilization had no significant effect on crop yield or the nutritional characteristics compared with a non-inoculated crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–974
t0

“Fava Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–160

Title

Inoculation with Different Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Affects Grain Protein Content and Nodule Bacterial Communities of a Fava Bean Crop

Virginia Sánchez-Navarro; Raúl Zornoza; Ángel Faz; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10060768

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.