View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
MH75 caused no significant decrease in protein, GLI or GLU versus MH100.
Outcomeprotein content and the amount of GLI and GLU e0 Directiondid not cause a significant decrease e0 Qualifierespecially in the RT system e0 Verbatim
e0 “The application of the herbicide dose reduced by 25% (MH75) compared to the recommended dose (MH100), especially in the RT system, did not cause a significant decrease in protein content and the amount of GLI and GLU ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1407 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–152 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf N content at each sampling and its rate of decrease showed no significant correlation with the optimum fertilizer N rate.
Outcomecontent of N (%) in leaves at each sampling e2 Comparatoroptimum rate of fertilizer N e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “required for winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 e1 “the optimum rate of fertilizer N required for maximum grain yield was obtained ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–554 e2 “(i) content of N (%) in leaves at each sampling and its rate of decrease —no significant correlation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–747 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “three had nonsignificant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1087 e1 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The other seven recombinant strains produced no significant biomass increase or decrease at Hancock.
Treatmentseven other recombinant strains e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no other significant increases or decrease s in alfalfa biomass were observed with the seven other recombinant strains at that site. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1786 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Simulated damage at one larva per two and a half feet did not significantly reduce seed cotton yield .
Treatment1 larva/2½ feet e0 Outcomeyield of seed cotton e0 Directiondid not cause a significant decrease e0 Comparatorundamaged check e0 Verbatim
e0 “Simulated larva damage at the level of 1 larva/5 feet and 1 larva/2½ feet did not cause a significant decrease in yield of seed cotton over the undamaged check. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–324 t0 “Heliothis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cacao yield changed by −10% without statistical significance during roof closure.
Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cacao yield (−10%) during roof closure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–738 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying only 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, with common or water soluble fertilizers through fertigation, did not significantly reduce onion bulb yield .
Treatment75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers e4 Directiondid not significantly decrease e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 e4 “bulb yield did not significantly decrease by applying just 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, using common or water soluble fertilizers supplied through fertigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CCB did not significantly decrease SCN reproduction in strip trials.
OutcomeSCN reproduction e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “but not in any of the strip trials in any year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–914 t0 “Soybean Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–102 e1 “Relative to the CMV treatment, CCB significantly decrease d SCN reproductive factor in two small-plot experiments (one each in 2014 and 2015) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–867 e2 “but not in any of the small-plot experiments, even when there were significant decrease s in SCN reproduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1114 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing nitrogen decrease d effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.
Outcomeeffective panicles e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield ,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510 t0 “Rice Shennong 265 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 t1 “Nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change yield .
Treatmentmicrobial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilization e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Comparatornon-inoculated crop e0 Verbatim
e0 “microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilization had no significant effect on crop yield or the nutritional characteristics compared with a non-inoculated crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–974 t0 “Fava Bean Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–160 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.