Paper · 2011 · Journal of Horticultural Sciences

Effect of Microsprinkler Fertigation on Growth and Yield of Rabi Onion

M Prabhakar; S S Hebbar; A K Nair

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2005-2006 at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, to study the performance of onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers. Results indicated that crop growth in terms of leaf production, plant height, radial and equatorial diameter was not significantly influenced by the treatments. Fertigation treatments were superior for marketable bulb yield as compared to soil application of fertilizer. Also bulb yield through soil application of fertilizer increased by changing over from surface-irrigation to microsprinkler irrigation. However, bulb yield did not significantly decrease by applying just 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, using common or water soluble fertilizers supplied through fertigation. For achieving maximum yield, however, it is recommended to apply 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through sprinkler fertigation using water soluble fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microsprinkler fertigation treatments did not significantly influence onion crop growth in leaf production, plant height and diameter.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
Arka Niketane1
Treatment
microsprinkler fertigatione1
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop growth in terms of leaf production, plant height, radial and equatorial diameter was not significantly influenced by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation treatments gave higher marketable bulb yield of onion than soil application of fertilizer.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Fertigation treatmentse2
Outcome
marketable bulb yielde2
Direction
superiore2
Comparator
soil application of fertilizere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fertigation treatments were superior for marketable bulb yield as compared to soil application of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb yield through soil application of fertilizer increased when the irrigation was changed from surface irrigation to microsprinkler irrigation.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
changing over from surface-irrigation to microsprinkler irrigatione3
Outcome
bulb yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
surface-irrigatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 · show in text ↑
e3

“bulb yield through soil application of fertilizer increased by changing over from surface-irrigation to microsprinkler irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying only 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, with common or water soluble fertilizers through fertigation, did not significantly reduce onion bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
75% of the recommended NPK fertilizerse4
Outcome
bulb yielde4
Direction
did not significantly decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 · show in text ↑
e4

“bulb yield did not significantly decrease by applying just 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, using common or water soluble fertilizers supplied through fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–844 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying 100% of the recommended fertilizer dose through sprinkler fertigation with water soluble fertilizers to achieve maximum onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizers through sprinkler fertigation using water soluble fertilizerse5
Outcome
maximum yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 · show in text ↑
e5

“For achieving maximum yield, however, it is recommended to apply 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through sprinkler fertigation using water soluble fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1009 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 251 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.