View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sprout yield first rose then fell with rising urea concentration without a significant difference.
urea concentration e0 increase first and then decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the urea concentration increasing, yield showed the tendency of increase first and then decrease ,but did not show significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–364 t0 “Mung Bean Seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–106 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.
Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage e0 fiber linear density e0 did not decrease significantly e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield , fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Single-dose trinexapac‐ethyl reduced straw yield by 5%, without significance at p = 0.05.
TE was applied in a single dose e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a 5% decrease (although not significant at p = 0.05) in straw yield when TE was applied in a single dose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–966 t0 “Winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage with chopped straw did not significantly lower maize grain yield .
reduced tillage systems in combination with chopped straw e0 maize grain yield e0 without any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the reduced tillage systems in combination with chopped straw can be applied on the studied soils without any significant decrease in maize grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1449 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization was not correlated with biomass or phosphorus content in maize.
axial roots e0 arbuscular mycorrhizal e0 symbiont biomass or phosphorus content e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 e0 “plants had up to 55% less arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in axial roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–941 e1 “this decrease was not correlated with biomass or phosphorus content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1014 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cd did not significantly lower leaf yield .
Increasing doses of Cd e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Increasing doses of Cd did not significantly decrease leaf yield of tobacco cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–605 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 e1 “four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Common bean tolerated a water table at 15 cm or deeper without a significant growth decrease .
soil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper e0 without significant decrease e0 riparian wetland t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) could tolerate soil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper without significant decrease in growth and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–973 t0 “riparian wetland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–103 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Straw return with nitrogen tended to reduce wheat yield relative to nitrogen alone without a statistically significant difference.
S+N treatments e0 single N treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “comparedwith the single N treatments,the yield of wheat underS+N treatments showed a trend of decrease ,but the difference between themwas insignificant statistically ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–535 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
BactoMix 5 did not significantly decrease P. brassicae in soil.
P. brassicae in the soile0 did not show a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results did not show a significant decrease in the P. brassicae in the soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–451 e1 “The cultivation of cruciferous crops is threatened by extensive yield losses caused by the soil-borne pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin, 1877. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 e2 “the bacterial product BactoMix 5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–241 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane and sugar yield s showed neither a significant increase nor decrease before 1968.
sugarcane and sugar yields e6 no_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e0 “Florida is the largest producer of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) in the United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 e6 “There was neither a significant increase nor decrease in sugarcane and sugar yield s before 1968. For 1969 to 2000, the increase in sugarcane yield (0.29 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) was less than the increase in sugar yield (0.09 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1613 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0
Hibiscus cannabinus
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Nicotiana tabacum
Phaseolus vulgaris.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Plasmodiophora brassicae