Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Cadmium Toxicity on Chemical Contents and Leaf Yield of Three Sun-Cured Tobacco Varieties

Halil Erdem; Ahmet Kinay; Erdem Karakoç

10
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tobacco plants grown in cadmium (Cd)-contaminated soils accumulate high concentration of Cd in leaves and the Cd in leaves can readily be transferred to the human body through smoking of cigarettes. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations and nicotine, reducing sugar and phenolic compounds of sun-cured Canik 190/5, Xanthi 81, and Birlik 124 varieties grown in a semi-arid condition of Turkey. Increasing doses of Cd did not significantly decrease leaf yield of tobacco cultivars, while significant (p < .05) increase and decrease were recorded in leaf Cd and Zn concentrations, respectively. The highest leaf Cd concentration was accumulated in Birlik 124 (60.5 mg kg−1), and the lowest in Canik 190/5 (55.35 mg kg−1) variety. Nicotine concentration of Xanthi 81 and Birlik 124 cultivars in the highest Cd dose (Cd20) increased compared to the nicotine in control application, while nicotine concentration of Canik 190/5 cultivars decreased in Cd20 dose. The results revealed that all three tobacco varieties were able to accumulate Cd in their leaves under high soil Cd levels. The effects of Cd on N uptake and nicotine, reducing sugar and phenolic compounds were different among the tobacco varieties. The result may be associated with differences in responses of tobacco cultivars to soil Cd concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd did not significantly lower leaf yield.

Treatment
Increasing doses of Cde0
Outcome
leaf yielde0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing doses of Cd did not significantly decrease leaf yield of tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd increased leaf Cd concentration.

Treatment
Cde1
Outcome
leaf Cde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p < .05) increase and decrease were recorded in leaf Cd and Zn concentrations, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd decreased leaf Zn concentration.

Treatment
Cde1
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p < .05) increase and decrease were recorded in leaf Cd and Zn concentrations, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birlik 124 had the highest leaf Cd concentration at 60.5 mg kg−1.

Material
Birlik 124e0
Outcome
leaf Cd concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
60.5 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest leaf Cd concentration was accumulated in Birlik 124 (60.5 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canik 190/5 had the lowest leaf Cd concentration at 55.35 mg kg−1.

Material
Canik 190/5e0
Outcome
leaf Cd concentratione2
Direction
loweste0
Value
55.35 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest in Canik 190/5 (55.35 mg kg−1) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest leaf Cd concentration was accumulated in Birlik 124 (60.5 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Cd20, Xanthi 81 nicotine concentration increased against control.

Material
Xanthi 81e0
Treatment
Cd20e0
Outcome
Nicotine concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotine concentration of Xanthi 81 and Birlik 124 cultivars in the highest Cd dose (Cd20) increased compared to the nicotine in control application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Cd20, Birlik 124 nicotine concentration increased against control.

Material
Birlik 124e0
Treatment
Cd20e0
Outcome
Nicotine concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotine concentration of Xanthi 81 and Birlik 124 cultivars in the highest Cd dose (Cd20) increased compared to the nicotine in control application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Cd20, Canik 190/5 nicotine concentration decreased.

Material
Canik 190/5e0
Treatment
Cd20 dosee0
Outcome
nicotine concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nicotine concentration of Canik 190/5 cultivars decreased in Cd20 dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three varieties accumulated Cd in leaves at high soil Cd.

Outcome
accumulate Cd in their leavese0
Qualifier
high soil Cd levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three tobacco varieties were able to accumulate Cd in their leaves under high soil Cd levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd effects on N uptake, nicotine, sugar, and phenolics differed among varieties.

Outcome
N uptake and nicotine, reducing sugar and phenolic compoundse0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Cd on N uptake and nicotine, reducing sugar and phenolic compounds were different among the tobacco varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“four soil Cd concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1) on leaf Cd, zinc (Zn), and nitrogen (N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–363 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 1 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

cadmium atom · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.