Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest-pruning did not significantly decrease dried fruit yield of Sultana vines after seven and five seasons.

Taxon: grapevineVitise0
Material: cv. Sultanae0
Treatment: harvest-pruninge0
Outcome: yields of dried fruite1
Direction: not decreasede1
Qualifier: After seven and five seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The effect of harvest-pruning of the grapevine cv. Sultana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–58

e1
“After seven and five seasons respectively, yields of dried fruit had not decreased significantly on harvest-pruned vines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–313

Title

Long-term response of Sultana vines to harvest pruning

May, P.; Scholefield, P. B. Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut) 2017. doi:10.5073/vitis.1972.11.296-302

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Harvest-pruned Sultana vines showed a trend towards lower yield.
Intervention effect Harvest-pruned Sultana vines showed a trend towards reduced vegetative growth.
Intervention effect The 45 cm or 90 cm wide trellises did not significantly affect Sultana vine performance compared with a 30 cm trellis.
Recommendation Harvest-pruning will not lead to increasingly severe productivity reductions in grapevine, but losses of up to 15% could possibly occur.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the clonal tillers at 20 or 40 days after transplanting did not significantly decrease grain yield compared with the undisturbed crop.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Treatment: clonal tillers were removed at 20 or 40 days after transplantinge2
Outcome: grain yielde2
Direction: did not decreasee2
Comparator: undisturbed crope2

Verbatim

e1
“In rainfed lowland rice areas of intermediate deepwater (15–50 cm), transplanting in greater depths of water (50–60 cm) with clonal tillers (double transplanting) from 20 or 40- to 50-day-old-transplanted crops of similar environment increased grain yield significantly compared with seedlings of the same age (60 or 80- to 90-day-old) from a nursery”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–358

e2
“The grain yield did not decrease significantly when the clonal tillers were removed at 20 or 40 days after transplanting compared with that of the undisturbed crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523

Title

Comparative efficiency of different planting methods in intermediate deepwater (15–50 cm) rice

M. D. Reddy; B. C. Ghosh The Journal of Agricultural Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0021859600079971

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly lower dry matter.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: basal 25% defoliatione0
Outcome: TDMe0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“basal 25% defoliation did not decrease TDM, seed weight/plant and seed yield/ha significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–867

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–103

Title

Defoliation and its effect on morphology, biochemical parameters, yield and yield attributes of soybean

M. R. Ali; M. Ashrafuzzaman; Mohammad Abdul Malek; et al. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Increasing defoliation reduced leaf area regardless of variety.
Intervention effect Increasing defoliation reduced total dry matter regardless of variety.
Intervention effect Defoliation reduced source size.
Intervention effect Defoliation reduced pod production.
Intervention effect Defoliation lowered seed yields.
Intervention effect Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly lower seed weight per plant.
Intervention effect Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly lower seed yield per hectare.
Intervention effect Defoliation above 25% significantly reduced dry matter.
Intervention effect Defoliation above 25% significantly reduced seed yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased yield by 4.9%, without a significant difference.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Nitrogent1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510

t0
“Rice Shennong 265”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76

t1
“Nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased seed setting rate by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased 1000-grain weight by 2.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased grains per panicle by 2.5%, without a significant difference.
Observation Leaf, stem and panicle nitrogen content and accumulation decreased across growth stages.
Observation Nitrogen harvest index, physical efficiency and agronomic efficiency increased.
Observation Partial productivity increased.
Observation Nitrogen remobilization to panicles increased.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing nitrogen fertilizer for optimal yield structure and nitrogen efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The increased N/maize price ratio did not significantly decrease economic optimum yields and net income.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: the increased N/maize price ratioe0
Outcome: economic optimum yields and the net incomee2
Direction: decreasee2
Comparator: the current N/maize price ratioe1

Verbatim

t0
“NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR MAIZE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32

e0
“the increased N/maize price ratio, that reduced the economic optimum N rates and fertilization costs”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1596

e1
“the current N/maize price ratio for the attainable yield classes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1402

e2
“without significantly decrease of the economic optimum yields and the net income”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1678

Title

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR MAIZE BASED ON ATTAINABLE YIELD AND SOIL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT

Mariana Margarita Sánchez-Roldán; Iván Ortiz-Monasterio; Víctor Hugo Volke-Haller; et al. Agrociencia 2022. doi:10.47163/agrociencia.v56i4.2808

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect An increased N/maize price ratio reduced economic optimum N rates and fertilization costs for maize relative to the current price ratio.
Intervention effect The increased N/maize price ratio also reduces N losses and environmental pollution.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

The controller caused no significant decrease in simulated maize leaf area index relative to constant irrigation.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Outcome: leaf area indexe0
Direction: without any significant decreasee0
Comparator: constant irrigation method of the DSSAT modele0

Verbatim

e0
“almost 40% decrease in water consumption is achieved in comparison to constant irrigation method of the DSSAT model without any significant decrease in yield and leaf area index.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2249–2427

e1
“DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer) maize crop simulation model”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1999

Title

Reinforcement Learning Based Controller For Precision Irrigation

Shivaram Irukula OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) 2015

Other claims from this paper (2)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD75 non-significantly decreased maize yield while saving 25% of water use

Taxon: maizeZea mayse5
Treatment: PRD75e5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: decreasee5
Qualifier: saving 25% of water usee5

Verbatim

e5
“PRD75 improved the quality traits of maize yield and non-significantly decrease of yield with saving 25% of water use during the treatment period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1260

Title

Investigation of Quantity and Quality Traits of Maize Yield under Partial Root Zone Drying and Deficit Irrigation Strategies

Elaheh IshaghiNasrabadi; Ali Shahnazari; Mirkhalegh Ziatabarahmadi; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation treatments PRD75 and DI75 significantly increased grain protein content relative to full irrigation
Association PRD75 gave the highest protein percentage of maize grain yield (10.02%)
Association PRD55 gave the lowest protein percentage of maize grain yield (9.14%)
Intervention effect PRD75 did not significantly change thousand seed weight, kernel number per row or row number per ear relative to full irrigation
Association PRD75 improved the quality traits of maize

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilization showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower sunflower yield than the check.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment: boron fertilizatione0
Outcome: sunflower yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: checke0

Verbatim

e0
“Although sunflower yield from boron fertilization was not significantly different from the check, a trend was observed in which boron fertilization seemed to decrease sunflower yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–644

Title

Effects of sulfur, zinc, iron, copper, manganese, and boron applications on sunflower yield and plant nutrient concentration

B. R. Hilton; J. C. Zubriski Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1985. doi:10.1080/00103628509367615

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect The six nutrient applications did not affect sunflower seed yield.
Intervention effect The six nutrient applications did not affect sunflower oil percentage.
Intervention effect Zn uptake at the 12-leaf stage responded significantly to fertilization.
Intervention effect Mn uptake at the 12-leaf stage responded significantly to fertilization.
Intervention effect B uptake at the 12-leaf stage responded significantly to fertilization.
Intervention effect Zinc fertilization increased Zn uptake in the uppermost mature leaf at anthesis.
Intervention effect Boron-treated plots had the lowest sunflower yields among seven treatments in three of four fields.
Intervention effect Combined across fields, boron reduced sunflower yield relative to iron and sulfur treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving the original N rate did not significantly decrease wheat grain yield or N uptake, except at N120.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment: half reduction of original N ratee5
Outcome: grain yield and N uptakee5
Direction: not significantly declinede5
Qualifier: except the treatment N120e5
Comparator: original N ratee5

Verbatim

t0
“winter wheat-summer maize cropping system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–106

e5
“The grain yield and N uptake of wheat were not significantly declined with the half reduction of original N rate except the treatment N120”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1012

Title

[Effect of reduced N application on N utilization and balance in winter wheat-summer maize cropping system].

Xuejun Liu; Xiaotang Ju; Fusuo Zhang PubMed 2004

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Wheat grain yield reached a plateau at N120 and did not rise further with higher N rates.
Observation Maize grain yield reached a plateau at N120 and did not rise further with higher N rates.
Observation Wheat N uptake followed the same tendency as its yield across N rates.
Observation Maize N uptake followed the same tendency as its yield across N rates.
Intervention effect In maize, grain yield and N uptake significantly declined when N fertilizer was reduced to zero.
Intervention effect Reduced N sub-plots had significantly lower residual NO3-N in the 0-1 m soil layer than plots at the original N rate.
Intervention effect Residual NO3-N in the 1-2 m soil layer did not differ between reduced and original N rates.
Intervention effect Reducing N fertilizer largely raised N recovery by crops.
Association The apparent N loss rate decreased in the wheat-maize rotation with reduced N fertilizer.
Intervention effect Reducing fertilizer N under a high N rate can significantly increase N use efficiency.
Intervention effect Reducing fertilizer N under a high N rate can significantly reduce NO3-N accumulation and apparent N loss.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2007 planting, applying water-retaining agent without water did not significantly decrease cane yield compared with the control.

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Organ / stage: Planting sugarcanee5
Treatment: applying water-retaining agent without watere5
Outcome: cane yielde5
Direction: no significantly decreasede5
Comparator: the controle5

Verbatim

e0
“growth and yield of sugarcane in new planting sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–278

e5
“Planting sugarcane in 2007,the cane yield of applying water-retaining agent without water was no significantly decreased in comparison with the control,but significantly decreased in comparison with the treatment of applying water-retaining agent with water”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–992

Title

Effect of Different Application Process of Water-retaining Agent on Sugarcane Growth and Yield

Tang Hong-qin Zhongguo tangliao 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics