Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the fertilization rate did not necessarily decrease soybean yield or net income (NI).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Reducing the fertilization ratee2
Outcome
soybean yield and NIe2
Direction
did not necessarily result in a decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Rainfed Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66
e2

“Reducing the fertilization rate reduced the input costs, but it did not necessarily result in a decrease in soybean yield and NI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1544

Title

Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China

Zhenqi Liao; Shengzhao Pei; Zhentao Bai; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13112840

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A reduced N rate did not significantly decrease seed yield under optimized rotation.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
reduced N ratee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
without a significant/equivalent decreasee0
Qualifier
when the rotation was optimisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A reduced N rate increased N-use efficiency and reduced the risk of high N surpluses without a significant/equivalent decrease of the seed yield when the rotation was optimised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1757
t0

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72

Title

Impacts of high intensity crop rotation and N management on oilseed rape productivity in Germany

Hannes Hegewald; Barbara Koblenz; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2016. doi:10.1071/cp15214

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicide treatments did not decrease cranberry yield.

Taxon
cranberrye0
Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
cranberry yielde0
Direction
none of these treatments decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“none of these treatments decreased cranberry yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–459

Title

Postattachment Control of Swamp Dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and Carrot (Daucus carota)

Thomas A. Bewick; Larry K. Binning; Malcolm N. Dana Weed Technology 1988. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00030323

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undersown winter turnip rape did not decrease cereal yield.

Taxon
Cereale0
Treatment
undersown winter turnip rapee0
Outcome
Cereal yielde0
Direction
not decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cereal yield was not decreased by the undersown winter turnip rape and quality of wheat was only slightly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1591

Title

Winter turnip rape in mixed cropping: advantages and disadvantages

Antti Tuulos Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja 2015

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter crop yield did not distinctly depend on the decrease of snowfall and snow cover residence time

Taxon
WINTER CROPSt0
Treatment
the decrease of the snowfall amount and snow cover residence timee1
Outcome
winter crops yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER CROPS YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94
e1

“The observed in the analysed period winter crops yield does not show distinctly the supposed dependence on the decrease of the snowfall amount and snow cover residence time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–879

Title

A STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE CHANGES IN WINTER PRECIPITATION PATTERN ON THE WINTER CROPS YIELD IN SOUTH CENTRAL REGION OF BULGARIA

O. NITCHEVA; A. VATRALOVA; D. SHOPOVA; et al. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2022. doi:10.15666/aeer/2002_17291740

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DDT-related decrease in flower number and shorter flowering had no detrimental effect on cowpea yield.

Treatment
Sprays of DDTe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no detrimental effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced and to shorten the duration of flowering; these factors had no detrimental effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–444

Title

Relationships of Insect Control Attempts by Chemicals to Components of Yield of Cowpeas in Uganda

C. S. Koehler; P. N. Mehta Journal of Economic Entomology 1972. doi:10.1093/jee/65.5.1421

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing wheat row spacing from 12 to 24 cm did not decrease wheat yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Increasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
didn´t decreasee0
Qualifier
maintaining the same seeding densitye0
Comparator
12e0

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm, but maintaining the same seeding density, didn´t decrease its yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126

Title

Row spacing and catch crop establishment in organic arable systems: a way to increase biological N fixation

Chiara De Notaris; Peter Sørensen; Jim Rasmussen; et al. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2016

Other claims from this paper (1)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced mineral N for six years did not decrease tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
reduced mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
did not lead to a decreasee0
Comparator
conventional high N treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“Six years of reduced mineral N fertilization did not lead to a decrease in fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–896
e2

“in greenhouse tomato production; however”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–121
e1

“conventional high N treatment [600 kg N ha-1]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–657

Title

Nitrogen and Straw Applications Increase Population Size ofBacillusandPseudomonasspp. in Greenhouse Soil

Ge Xiaoying; Chen Qing; Sun Zhigang; et al. Journal of Resources and Ecology 2015. doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.05.002

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not decrease weed competition or wheat yield losses in the treatment year.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
both treatmentse0
Outcome
weed competition and yield lossese0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both treatments did not decrease weed competition and yield losses in the year of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2680–2771
t0

“Impact of Panicle Cutting and Chaff Milling on the Panicle and Seed Density of Three Grass Weeds and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128

Title

Impact of Panicle Cutting and Chaff Milling on the Panicle and Seed Density of Three Grass Weeds and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat

Roland Gerhards; Klaus Gehring; Theresa Ann Piskáčková; et al. Weed Research 2026. doi:10.1111/wre.70045

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdress nitrogen did not decrease final grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
topdress applicatione0
Outcome
final grain yielde0
Direction
without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“topdress application enhanced GPC and NFUE without decreasing the final grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1284
e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–72

Title

Nitrogen management impact on winter wheat grain yield and estimated plant nitrogen loss

Jagmandeep Dhillon; Elizabeth Eickhoff; Lawrence Aula; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20107

Other claims from this paper (9)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.