View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing the fertilization rate did not necessarily decrease soybean yield or net income (NI).
TreatmentReducing the fertilization rate e2 Outcomesoybean yield and NI e2 Directiondid not necessarily result in a decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rainfed Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–66 e2 “Reducing the fertilization rate reduced the input costs, but it did not necessarily result in a decrease in soybean yield and NI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1544 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A reduced N rate did not significantly decrease seed yield under optimized rotation.
Treatmentreduced N rate e0 Directionwithout a significant/equivalent decrease e0 Qualifierwhen the rotation was optimised e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A reduced N rate increased N-use efficiency and reduced the risk of high N surpluses without a significant/equivalent decrease of the seed yield when the rotation was optimised ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1757 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
These herbicide treatments did not decrease cranberry yield .
Treatmentthese treatments e0 Directionnone of these treatments decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “none of these treatments decrease d cranberry yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–459 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Undersown winter turnip rape did not decrease cereal yield .
Treatmentundersown winter turnip rape e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cereal yield was not decrease d by the undersown winter turnip rape and quality of wheat was only slightly affected. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1591 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter crop yield did not distinctly depend on the decrease of snowfall and snow cover residence time
Treatmentthe decrease of the snowfall amount and snow cover residence time e1 Outcomewinter crops yield e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “WINTER CROPS YIELD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–94 e1 “The observed in the analysed period winter crops yield does not show distinctly the supposed dependence on the decrease of the snowfall amount and snow cover residence time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–879 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The DDT-related decrease in flower number and shorter flowering had no detrimental effect on cowpea yield .
Directionno detrimental effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced and to shorten the duration of flowering; these factors had no detrimental effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–444 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing wheat row spacing from 12 to 24 cm did not decrease wheat yield .
TreatmentIncreasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm e0 Directiondidn´t decrease e0 Qualifiermaintaining the same seeding density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm, but maintaining the same seeding density, didn´t decrease its yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced mineral N for six years did not decrease tomato fruit yield .
Treatmentreduced mineral N fertilization e0 Directiondid not lead to a decrease e0 Comparatorconventional high N treatment e1 Verbatim
e0 “Six years of reduced mineral N fertilization did not lead to a decrease in fruit yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–896 e2 “in greenhouse tomato production; however ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–121 e1 “conventional high N treatment [600 kg N ha-1] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–657 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The treatments did not decrease weed competition or wheat yield losses in the treatment year.
Treatmentboth treatments e0 Outcomeweed competition and yield losses e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treatments did not decrease weed competition and yield losses in the year of treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2680–2771 t0 “Impact of Panicle Cutting and Chaff Milling on the Panicle and Seed Density of Three Grass Weeds and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Topdress nitrogen did not decrease final grain yield .
Treatmenttopdress application e0 Outcomefinal grain yield e0 Directionwithout decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “topdress application enhanced GPC and NFUE without decreasing the final grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1284 e1 “winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–72 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.