View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield tended to decrease as sowing rates increased.
Treatmentincreasing sowing rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield was tending to decrease with increasing sowing rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1561 t0 “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield was stronger under the RCP8.5 scenario.
TreatmentRCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “Moreover, this decrease is stronger for the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in fruit yield .
Directionno apparent decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The paclobutrazol treatment resulted in a 67.9% decrease in annual extension shoot growth compared to controls and no apparent decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–545 t0 “Nectarine Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Although some cultivars showed initial lower growth rates, crop yield did not decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Although some cultivars had shown initial signs of lower growth rates, there was no decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3034–3140 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relay cropping chili and watermelon showed no decrease in yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The relay cropping of chili and watermelon plants was effective simultaneously, and there was no decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1590 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 e1 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 t0 “Quantitative and qualitative impact of Tomato Black Ring Virus (TBRV) on Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The seed yield decrease in pinto beans was comparable to reductions in leaf and stem biomass.
Outcomedecrease in seed yield e0 Comparatorreductions in biomass of leaves and stems e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield was comparable to reductions in biomass of leaves and stems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–665 t0 “pinto beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
TreatmentFurther decrease in the space between plants e4 Directionabrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
Treatmentreduction in seed rate e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentincreasing the density e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.