View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with lower grain weight.
ComparatorYield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield decrease was associated to a significant reduction in the number of grains per spike and in grain weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 t0 “different wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with fewer grains per spike.
Outcomenumber of grains per spike e0 ComparatorYield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield decrease was associated to a significant reduction in the number of grains per spike and in grain weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 t0 “different wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
Materialresistant lines e0 Comparatorsusceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight of winter wheat.
TreatmentShading at all three stages e0 Outcomeyield and grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 e0 “Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–692 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield of 0.24 t/ha.
TreatmentNo-till system e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the No-till system there was a reliable decrease in wheat yield on 0.24 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1600 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biotrophic pathogens (leaf rust, yellow rust, powdery mildew) and the necrotrophic pathogens caused a significant yield decrease in both years.
Interactornecrotrophic pathogens e0 pathogen Second interactorbiotrophic e0 pathogen Verbatim
e0 “The biotrophic (leaf rust, yellow rust and powdery mildew) as well as the mentioned necrotrophic pathogens caused significant yield decrease in both years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1051 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Time-series analysis found a statistically very significant long-term decrease in winter wheat yield .
Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “there is statistically very significant long-term tendency of yield decreasing of winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–959 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Climate change in 2031–2060 is projected to significantly decrease wheat yield versus 1981–2010.
Treatmentclimate change between 2031 and 2060 e0 Comparatorperiod from 1981 to 2010 e0 Verbatim
e0 “climate change between 2031 and 2060 is anticipated to cause a significant decrease in wheat yield and an increase in wheat protein concentration compared to the period from 1981 to 2010 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–825 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The start decrease stage was highly correlated with yield in 2020 irrigated (r=0.53).
Directionhigher inferred e4 Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat growth dynamics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 e4 “the start decrease stage (SDS) was highly correlated with yield (r=0.53 in 2020 irrigated, p<0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1230 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease rate date was positively correlated with yield in 2019 dryland (r=0.55).
Directionhigher inferred e5 Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat growth dynamics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 e5 “The maximum decrease rate date (MDRD) was positively correlated with yield in 2019 dryland (r=0.55, p<0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1340 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.