View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vicia faba ✕
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maryot2 showed the highest seed yield decrease (21.51) under water deficit in the first season.
Outcomedecrease in seed yield e1 Qualifierin the first season e1 Verbatim
t0 “SOME FABA BEAN CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 e1 “Maryot2 cultivar recorded the highest decrease in seed yield (21.51) in the first season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield of the Tumsa variety is projected to decrease by up to 24.19% under RCP 8.5 in mid-century.
Verbatim
t0 “faba bean (Vicia faba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–68 e5 “The yield of Tumsa variety will decrease by up to 24.19% under RCP8.5 in mid-century ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1593 Other claims from this paper (12) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rust severity greater than 5% during the critical stage would substantially decrease final yield .
TreatmentRust severity greater than 5% e6 InteractorUromyces viciae‐fabae e0 pathogen Qualifierduring that critical stage e6 Verbatim
e0 “Epidemics of faba bean rust (Uromyces viciae‐fabae ) differing in duration and final severity were induced by a point inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 e6 “Rust severity greater than 5% during that critical stage would substantially decrease final yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1109 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Faba bean yield in the area is projected to both increase and decrease for both varieties in the upcoming decades.
Qualifierfor both varieties in the upcoming decades e7 Verbatim
t0 “faba bean (Vicia faba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–68 e7 “the area will experience an increase and a decrease in faba bean yield for both varieties in the upcoming decades ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1841 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decrease d faba bean grain and biological yield .
TreatmentOrganic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments e2 Outcomegrain yield and biological yield e2 Verbatim
e2 “Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control. Intervention effect Inorganic fertilizer (urea) increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control. Intervention effect Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments decreased pea grain and biological yield, by almost half compared with control. Intervention effect Bacteria inoculation gave the highest number of nodules per pea plant, 125.9, against 121.5 in the control. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the nitrogen treatment, 109.1, were not significant. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-1 treatment, 97.3, were not significant. Intervention effect Differences in pea nodules per plant for the Organic-2 treatment, 109.3, were not significant. Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per pea plant. Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected the number of nodules per faba bean plant. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Individual plant yield components significantly decrease d with density.
Treatmentincreased plant density e0 Outcomeyield components of individual plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield components of individual plants tend to significantly decrease with increased plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1133 t0 “faba bean ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–98 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water usage can be rationalized by 20.00% from the common irrigated treatment, reaching the highest water use efficiency even with a yield decrease in semi-arid areas.
Outcomeirrigation water usage e6 Qualifiereven with a decrease of yield e6 Comparatorthe common irrigated treatment e6 Settingsemi-arid areas with limited water e6 Verbatim
e0 “Four Egyptian Faba bean ecotypes and a commercial cultivar (Cleopatra) were grown under a drip irrigation system for evaluation under water deficit conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–501 e6 “it is possible to rationalize irrigation water usage by 20.00% from the common irrigated treatment to reach the highest irrigation water use efficiency even with a decrease of yield , especially in semi-arid areas with limited water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–2015 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging significantly decrease d yield in all genotypes.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Waterlogging was caused to decrease significantly grain yield in all genotypes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1139 t0 “Evaluating the Waterlogging Tolerance of Faba Bean Genotypes at Different Growth Stages under Field Conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in yield components at higher density resulted from competition among pods for environmental resources, which led plants to develop less.
Treatmentplant density increased e1 Outcomeyield components e1 Qualifiercompetition among pods to use environment resources e1 Verbatim
t0 “FABA BEAN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–71 e1 “As the plant density increased grain yield components including number of pods, number of grains per pod, and 100-grain weight decrease d which resulted from the competition among pods to use environment resources that caused the plants to develop less ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1085 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Later planting tended to reduce yield .
Comparatorfirst 3 wk in May e1 Verbatim
e0 “After this, yield s tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–105 e1 “The first 3 wk in May was the optimum time for planting faba beans. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.