View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Punica granatum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly decrease d total fruit yield .
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcometotal fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation led to a significant decrease in total fruit yield and number of total fruits per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–801 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode-affected pomegranate trees had smaller fruits.
Verbatim
e0 “A significant yield reduction (40.2%) and a decrease in fruit size was observed in nematode-affected trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–863 e1 “A significant yield reduction (40.2%) and a decrease in fruit size was observed in nematode-affected trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–863 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode-affected pomegranate trees had 40.2% lower yield .
Verbatim
e0 “A significant yield reduction (40.2%) and a decrease in fruit size was observed in nematode-affected trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–863 e1 “A significant yield reduction (40.2%) and a decrease in fruit size was observed in nematode-affected trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–863 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of Wonderful decrease d significantly in the second year under both SDI regimes.
Treatmentboth SDI regimes e4 Verbatim
e0 “two pomegranate cultivars, ‘Sefri’ and ‘Wonderful’ 21 trees each, in Sais plain (northern Morocco) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–236 e1 “Irrigation treatments consisted of a control, irrigation applied to fully satisfy crop evapotranspiration (100% ETC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–395 e4 “In ‘Wonderful’, a significant decrease in yield occurred in the second year under both SDI regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–791 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly decrease d fruit number per tree.
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcomenumber of total fruits per tree e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation led to a significant decrease in total fruit yield and number of total fruits per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–801 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower thinning significantly decrease d grade III fruit number.
TreatmentFlower thinning e0 Outcomefruit numbers of grade III e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Flower thinning and the flower thinning + spraying caused a significant decrease in the fruit numbers of grade III ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1076 t0 “Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower thinning plus spraying significantly decrease d grade III fruit number.
Treatmentflower thinning + spraying e0 Outcomefruit numbers of grade III e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Flower thinning and the flower thinning + spraying caused a significant decrease in the fruit numbers of grade III ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1076 t0 “Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower thinning significantly decrease d the total number of fruits per pomegranate tree compared with the control.
Treatmentflower thinning e1 Outcometotal number of fruits e1 Verbatim
e1 “the flower thinning led to a significant decrease of total number of fruits produced by the tree comparing to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–975 t0 “MANFALOUTY POMEGRANATE CULTIVAR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–98 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium at 3000 mg.L-1 significantly decrease d fruit cracking in pomegranate by 18.70%.
TreatmentPotassium achieved by concentration 3000 mg.L-1 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “pomegranate trees Punica granatum L. cv. Salimy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–150 e1 “Potassium achieved by concentration 3000 mg.L-1 significant decrease in the fruit cracking by 18.70% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–774 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Bimonthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 70.71% compared with the untreated control
Outcometotal fresh weight of suckers e1 Comparatoruntreated control e1 Verbatim
t0 “Manfalouty Pomegranate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–93 e1 “Suckering monthly or bimonthly resulted in significant decrease in total fresh weight of suckers and or watersprouts. These reductions were expressed as 85.30 and 70.71%, respectively, compared to the untreated control (4026.46 g) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1021 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.