Search claims · PlantClaims

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise gradually reducing water applications over several years to avoid a sudden yield decrease.

Taxon: Vitis labruscana BaileyVitis ×labruscanat0
Material: ‘Concord’t0
Outcome: gradually reduce water applications over several yearse0

Verbatim

e0
“to avoid a sudden decrease in yield, it would be necessary to gradually reduce water applications over several years.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1635

t0
“Vitis labruscana Bailey ‘Concord’”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–55

Title

Deficit Irrigation in Vitis labruscana Bailey ‘Concord’ in Central Washington

Jason E. Stout; Joan R. Davenport; R. Troy Peters HortScience 2017. doi:10.21273/hortsci11450-16

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect The 45% irrigation reduction initially lowered grape yield to 7.5 Mg/ha versus 19.2 Mg/ha in controls.
Intervention effect Yield under deficit irrigation recovered in subsequent seasons and was not statistically different from control.
Intervention effect Fruit quality did not differ statistically between irrigation treatments.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that biochar combined with IAWD can increase NEE and grain yield and further decrease CH4 emissions relative to IAWD without biochar.

Taxon: paddy ricee1
Treatment: Biochar combined with IAWDe0
Outcome: increase NEE and grain yield and further decrease CH4 emissionse0
Comparator: IAWD without biochare0

Verbatim

e0
“Biochar combined with IAWD can increase NEE and grain yield and further decrease CH4 emissions compared to IAWD without biochar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1214

e1
“paddy rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–198

Title

Biochar incorporation increases grain yield, net ecosystem CO2 exchange, and decreases CH4 emissions in an alternate wetting and drying paddy ecosystem

Wanning Dai; Zhengrong Bao; Jun Meng; et al. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103577

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Alternate wetting and drying decreased CH4 emissions by 81.1-87.6%.
Intervention effect Alternate wetting and drying decreased yield-scaled CH4 emissions by 81.3%-88.2%.
Intervention effect Alternate wetting and drying caused no grain-yield penalty.
Intervention effect Alternate wetting and drying decreased NEE by 6.5-13.9%.
Mechanism The authors attribute decreased NEE to increased soil heterotrophic respiration.
Mechanism The authors attribute decreased NEE to increased ecosystem respiration.
Intervention effect Biochar increased grain yield by 8.1-11.3% under both irrigation regimes.
Intervention effect Biochar reduced CH4 emissions by 25.8-38.9% under both irrigation regimes.
Intervention effect Biochar reduced yield-scaled CH4 emissions by 30.4-44.6% under both irrigation regimes.
Intervention effect Biochar increased gross primary product under both irrigation regimes.
Intervention effect Biochar increased ecosystem respiration under both irrigation regimes.
Intervention effect Biochar increased NEE by 9.7-11.1% under both irrigation regimes.
Mechanism The larger GPP increase than Re increase explained the biochar-associated NEE increase.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced photoperiod sensitivity makes Lyubava suitable as a second summer crop at 45 ± 2° latitude without a significant height and yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: Lyubavae0
Outcome: suitable as a second summer crope0
Qualifier: at latitudes of 45 ± 2° without a significant decrease in plant height and yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“Due to the reduced photoperiod sensitivity, the Lyubava variety is suitable as a second summer crop at latitudes of 45 ± 2° without a significant decrease in plant height and yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–736

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31

Title

Early drought-resistant soybean variety Lyubava

S.V. Zelentsov; E.V. Moshnenko; E.N. Budnikov; et al. Oil Crops 2022. doi:10.25230/2412-608x-2022-1-189-83-87

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Lyubava was obtained through selection for increased drought resistance.
Observation Lyubava yielded 2.39 t/ha on average, exceeding Slavia by 0.33 t/ha in 2018–2021 trials.
Observation Lyubava plant height at Krasnodar latitude was 90–115 cm.
Mechanism Lyubava has a deep root system associated by the authors with increased drought resistance.
Observation Lyubava was described as tall.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under a 10% yield decrease, soil salinity at the AL and AH growing stages should be controlled below 0.277% and 0.584%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume5
Organ / stage: growing stage at AL and AHe5
Outcome: soil salinitye5
Value: 0.277% and 0.584%e5
Qualifier: yield decrease by 10%e5

Verbatim

e5
“Under the condition of yield decrease by 10%,soil salinity of cotton growing stage at AL and AH should be controlled at below 0.277% and 0.584%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1175

Title

Research on Anti-salinity Indexes and Eigenvalue of Cotton under Alternative Irrigation with Fresh and Saline Water

Junyong Ma China Rural Water and Hydropower 2011

Other claims from this paper (6)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor: sicklepode0weed
Outcome: addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobace0
Qualifier: potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340

Title

Effect of Pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) Growth and Weed Control

C. Dale Monks; Michael G. Patterson; John W. Wilcut; et al. Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00044821

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Cotton tolerated postemergence pyrithiobac.
Intervention effect Adding MSMA to pyrithiobac injured cotton similarly to MSMA alone.
Intervention effect The herbicide treatments did not alter height to node ratio, node production or square retention.
Intervention effect Cotton maturity under MSMA ranged from no effect to delay.
Intervention effect Cotton maturity under DSMA ranged from no effect to delay.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased Florida beggarweed control in 1995 but not 1994.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased common cocklebur control in 1995 but not 1994.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased sicklepod control across three Alabama site years.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Including transpiration efficiency in the index would prevent its decrease when selecting for kernel yield.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome: an index including TEe0

Verbatim

e0
“Use of an index including TE would prevent selection for decreasing TE when selecting for KY”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1627

t0
“Peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51

Title

Heritability of Drought–Resistance Traits in Peanut

Alan Cruickshank Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) 2004

Other claims from this paper (6)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited irrigation, full irrigation at 50% depletion of available water avoids a significant decrease in seed yield; authors recommend it.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome: product seed yielde7

Verbatim

e0
“water use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annus L. )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–381

e7
“We therefore recommend that in case of limited irrigation water by %60 by the need of the full irrigation (50 % depletion of available water) without a significant decrease in product seed yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2165–2359

Title

ROLE OF PROLINE ACID IN IMPROVING SUNFLOWER YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS UNDER DEFICIT CONDITIONS WATER

Abass & Alag IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2016. doi:10.36103/ijas.v47i2.586

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Seed yield at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from the full-irrigation control.
Intervention effect Number of leaves, relative water content and leaf nitrogen concentration at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Fertilization percentage, seed number per head and 100-seed weight at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Period from planting to 50% flowering at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Observation Saving 40% of irrigation water would be possible, about 1920 and 2960 m3 per ha, without yield reduction.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 14.61% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 19.74% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 21.95% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 33.33% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Irrigation at 40% and at 60% of control gave the best water use efficiency in both seasons.
Association Proline acid concentration significantly affected most of the studied sunflower traits.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower fertilization percentage compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower seed yield to 3.75 and 2.21 t/ha compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased 100-seed weight, reported as 7.12 g.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased water use efficiency, reported as 0.84 kg seed per m3 water.
Association The interaction of irrigation and proline acid significantly affected all seed yield component traits in both seasons.
Recommendation Treating sunflower with proline acid at 60 mg/L is recommended to improve capacity against water stress.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatments are a possible way to decrease anthracnose symptoms and achieve greater yield in common bean.

Taxon: common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment: folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatmentse0
Outcome: anthracnose symptomse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The results of the present study support the novel possibility of using folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatments to decrease anthracnose symptoms in common bean and consequently, achieve greater yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1702

Title

Field Management of Anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) in Common Bean through Fungicides and Bioagents

Mohammed Amin Advances in Crop Science and Technology 2014. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000124

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Anthracnose incidence, severity and infected pods per plant were highest in control plots compared with fungicide-sprayed and bioagent-treated plots.
Intervention effect The area under the disease progress curve was highest in control plots compared with fungicide-sprayed and bioagent-treated plots.
Intervention effect Mancozeb-sprayed plots had a lower percentage of infected pods per plant (55.0) than control plots (78.9).
Intervention effect Folpan foliar spray gave the highest yield (3.3 t/ha) compared with control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens yielded 1.8 t/ha, higher than control plots.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment lowered relative yield loss to 46.3 compared with control (69.7).
Intervention effect Mancolaxyl foliar spray lowered relative yield loss to 22.8% compared with control (69.7).
Association Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment gave the highest rate of return (8,740).
Association Folpan foliar spray gave the highest net benefit value (43,154).

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors project warming could decrease yield for late wheat plantings and shift optimum planting earlier in desert southwest settings.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: decrease wheat yield for late plantings and shift optimum planting windows to earlier datese0
Setting: desert southwest of the United Statese0

Verbatim

e0
“possible future increases in temperature may decrease wheat yield for late plantings and shift optimum planting windows to earlier dates in areas of the world similar to the desert southwest of the United States”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1498

Title

Wheat Growth Response to Increased Temperature from Varied Planting Dates and Supplemental Infrared Heating

M. J. Ottman; B. A. Kimball; J. W. White; et al. Agronomy Journal 2012. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0212

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Wheat grain yield declined 42 g m −2 or 6.9% per 1°C above 16.3°C seasonal temperature.
Intervention effect Supplemental heating had no effect on grain yield in winter plantings.
Intervention effect Supplemental heating decreased grain yield in spring plantings from 510 to 368 g m −2.
Intervention effect Supplemental heating increased early fall grain yield from 3 to 435 g m −2 where frost limited unheated plots.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors caution that competition for water and nutrients under hot and dry conditions can substantially decrease yield and vine capacity.

Taxon: GrapevineVitist0
Outcome: substantial decrease in yield and vine capacitye0
Qualifier: particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set)e0
Setting: hot and dry conditionse0

Verbatim

e0
“under hot and dry conditions, competition for water and nutrients, particularly if it occurs at sensitive stages (such as bloom and berry set) can lead to a substantial decrease in yield and vine capacity.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1305

t0
“Grapevine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61

Title

Influence of Vineyard Floor Management Practices on Grapevine Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Fruit Composition

Dejan Tesic; Markus Keller; Ronald J. Hutton American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2007. doi:10.5344/ajev.2007.58.1.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Increasing floor cover decreased early-season soil moisture.
Intervention effect Increasing floor cover decreased petiole nutrient status.
Intervention effect Increasing floor cover strongly reduced vine vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Floor cover limited grape yield after three experimental years.
Association Treatment differences in growth, canopy structure and yield contributed to differences in berry weight and composition.
Association Vine response to floor covers was less pronounced in mild than hot and dry conditions.
Recommendation The authors identify total or partial floor cover as a tool to control grapevine vegetative growth.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics