View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity yield decrease ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 of EC.
salinity yield decrease e7 for each dS m-1 e7 Verbatim
e0 “Tomatoes, cucumbers and sweet peppers (capsicums) were grown in hydroponic systems in which the nutrient solutions were recirculated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132 e7 “salinity yield decrease values ranged from 2.3 to 7.6% for each dS m-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–950 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Variety Kiprez showed a yield decrease of 31.1 % under soil acidity and was among the most tolerant varieties.
most tolerant to soil acidity e4 Verbatim
t0 “Results of the study of promising varieties of winter rye in the Kirov region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 e4 “varieties ‘Kiprez’ and ‘Batist’ were the most tolerant to soil acidity; yield decrease was 31.1 % and 35.0 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1663 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Variety Batist showed a yield decrease of 35.0 % under soil acidity and was among the most tolerant varieties.
most tolerant to soil acidity e4 Verbatim
t0 “Results of the study of promising varieties of winter rye in the Kirov region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 e4 “varieties ‘Kiprez’ and ‘Batist’ were the most tolerant to soil acidity; yield decrease was 31.1 % and 35.0 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1663 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield benefit dropped to 0.68 t/ha in 1987–1992, a 69.5% decrease .
a decrease of 69.5% e0 Verbatim
e0 “From 1987 to 1992, the yield benefit dropped to a mean level of 0.68 t/ha a decrease of 69.5%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1646 t0 “potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–100 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The other mixture component usually has lower yield than its monoculture.
their own monoculture e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants of the other component usually show a decrease , relative to their own monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–237 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Albumin and globulin are projected to decrease .
Albumin and globulin e0 Verbatim
e0 “Albumin and globulin are projected to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–873 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease d by 72.3% under drought conditions.
drought conditions e5 percentage decrease in yield e5 Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat Accessions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–36 e5 “The percentage decrease in yield under drought conditions was 72.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1260 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.
cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas t0 grain yield (GYLD) e0 increased or did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216 t0 “cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Colored varieties had 1.0 percent to 10.9 percent less yield decrease than white cotton.
naturally colored cotton varieties e0 1.0 percent to 10.9 percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “two naturally colored cotton varieties lose less bolls of 4.1 percent to 7.0 percent, yield decrease lower 1.0 percent to 10.9 percent and growing days shorten 3 d to 4 d than white one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1206 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield differed significantly between upland and middle land, with a reported 14.09% decrease .
upland and middle land e0 Verbatim
e0 “Difference of yield decrease s between upland and middle land is significant (14.09%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–967 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cucumis sativus
Capsicum annuum
Solanum lycopersicume0
Secale cereale
Solanum tuberosum
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum