View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in MNAR after densification is attributed as the cause of a significant decrease in grains per ear.
Qualifier平均净同化率(MNAR)降低 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 e0 “增密后平均净同化率(MNAR)降低导致穗粒数显著降低 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–603 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Ear number and grains per ear are the main factors determining population yield above 15 t per hm2 in high-yield spring maize. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has an ear number of (7.08-9.60)x10^4 ears. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has 477-654 grains per ear. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a thousand-grain weight of 324.7-388.7 g. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a grain weight per ear of 168.9-234.0 g. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAImax above 6.5. Observation A reasonable population structure has mean LAI of about 5. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAI at harvest above 3.5. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for tall large-ear cultivars is 67,500-75,000 ears per hm2, 610-640 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight about 380 g, 220-240 g grain weight per ear and yield above 15 t per hm2. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for medium-height small-to-medium-ear cultivars is 75,000-97,500 ears per hm2, 520-600 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight 340-355 g, 180-220 g grain weight per ear and yield above 16.5 t per hm2. Intervention effect Increased planting density increased mean crop growth rate and total grain number per unit area. Intervention effect Increased planting density thereby raised yield. Intervention effect After densification, mean net assimilation rate (MNAR) decreased. Mechanism Structural potential tapping mainly through densification, where population gains exceed the loss in individual performance, achieves high yield above 15 t per hm2 (gain-loss compensation yield increase). Recommendation The authors identify functional potential tapping, giving combined gain in population structure and individual function (differential compensation yield increase), as an important route to further raise yield. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield reduction was attributed to fewer effective panicles, lower seed setting rate and lower 1000-grain weight.
Outcomereduction in yield e0 Qualifierdecrease in the number of effective panicles, the seed setting rate, and a decrease in the 1000-grains weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The main reasons for the reduction in yield was the significant decrease in the number of effective panicles, the seed setting rate, and a decrease in the 1000-grains weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1445 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced growth led to a significant decrease in inulin production.
Outcomeinulin production e0 Verbatim
e0 “growth, which in turn led to a significant decrease in inulin production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1441 e1 “Root chicory displayed resistance to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1316 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Lodging of intercropped soybean may be due to the significant decrease in stem NDF.
Qualifiersignificant decrease in stem NDF e4 Verbatim
e4 “Intercropped soybean was lodged both years more than monocrop soybean, which may have been due to the significant decrease in stem NDF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1450 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The lack of yield increase in Rosner was apparently due to a significant decrease in fertility when the 6R block was lost.
Outcomelack of yield increase in Rosner e4 Qualifiera significant decrease in fertility when the heterochromatin block on 6R was lost e4 Verbatim
e0 “using triticales (× Triticosecale Wittmack) isogenic for the presence or absence of the heterochromatin blocks on rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosomes 6R and 7R/4R ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–326 e4 “The lack of yield increase in Rosner was apparently due to a significant decrease in fertility when the heterochromatin block on 6R was lost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–980 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No potassium fertilization reduced paddy grain and significantly decrease d paddy yield .
Treatmentno K fertilization e0 Outcomesignificant decrease in paddy yield e0 Qualifierreduction in paddy grain e0 Verbatim
e0 “The important cause of significant decrease in paddy yield was the reduction in paddy grain for no K fertilization. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1011 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism hypothesis original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The increased Zn concentration may have contributed to lower pepper dry matter yield .
Outcomedry matter yield of pepper e0 Verbatim
e0 “Zn concentration in pepper significantly increased with increasing application rates of both materials. This might resulted in significant decrease in dry matter yield of pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1489 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress causes significant yield reduction in grain legumes through impaired establishment, nutrient uptake, growth and yield formation.
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Qualifierdecrease in stand establishment e0 Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress in grain legumes at any stage causes significant yield reduction owing to a decrease in stand establishment (misfunctioning of germination enzymes like proteases and amylases), and nutrient uptake (decreasing water use efficiency), growth (disrupting cell division and leaf expansion), and yield formation (inhibiting photosynthesis) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–510 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced stomatal conductance may explain lower ozone uptake and damage.
Qualifierdecreased stomatal conductance e0 Verbatim
e0 “which could be explained by a significant decrease in O 3 uptake resulting from decrease d stomatal conductance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1988–2099 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 Other claims from this paper (18) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum decrease d soil pH and increased calcium and zinc supply.
TreatmentGypsum application e0 Outcomesoil pH and increase in Ca and Zn supply e0 Qualifiersignificant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Gypsum application significantly increased yield and Zn uptake in rice because of a significant decrease in soil pH and increase in Ca and Zn supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–443 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.