View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172 t0 “OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
August 10 transplanting caused a drastic decrease in rice yield .
transplanting on August 10 e1 drastic decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “causing drastic decrease of rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–1986 e1 “transplanting on August 10 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1860 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield was stronger under the RCP8.5 scenario.
RCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “Moreover, this decrease is stronger for the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in fruit yield .
no apparent decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The paclobutrazol treatment resulted in a 67.9% decrease in annual extension shoot growth compared to controls and no apparent decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–545 t0 “Nectarine Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
Further decrease in the space between plants e4 abrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
reduction in seed rate e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield .
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in biological yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
pathogen inoculation e0 don’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Withholding nitrogen after flowering did not decrease green soybean yield .
withholding nitrogen after flowering e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no decrease in yield in treatments withholding nitrogen after flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–552 e1 “In green soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–217 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Arachis hypogaea
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Prunus cerasus
Triticum aestivum