View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
FAW feeding only on panicles caused decrease yield .
TreatmentFAW only had rice panicles to feed on e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Choice bioassays exhibited an increased percent of blank kernels and decrease in yield when FAW only had rice panicles to feed on. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1719 e1 “rice, Oryza sativa , (L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–187 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated cotton had a 82% decrease in yield /plant.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield /plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 t0 “Upland Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Adzuki seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
Treatmentdeflowering for up to 9 days e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Westbred seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
Treatmentdeflowering for up to 9 days e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
Treatmentsulphur dioxide treatment e0 Outcomeyield of alfalfa e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Qualifierunder none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Biochicol 020PC was associated with a decrease of maize yield .
TreatmentBiochicol 020PC e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–800 e2 “maize plant mass above the ground and roots was evaluated at phase of 4-5 leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–175 e3 “Biochicol 020PC did not cause significant changes in maize plants development and heath condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–631 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing PPFD caused a considerable decrease in the maximum fluorescence yield of light-adapted leaves (FM´).
Treatmentincreasing PPFD e1 Outcomemaximum fluorescence yield of a light-adapted leaf (FM´) e1 Directionconsiderable decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “functional peculiarities of photosynthetic apparatus of Stellaria humifusa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–152 e1 “a considerable decrease the maximum fluorescence yield of a light-adapted leaf (FM´) at increasing PPFD was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1202 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants damaged in the fall showed a marked decrease in grain yield at spring harvest.
TreatmentPlants damaged in the fall e5 Outcomegrain yield at spring harvest e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “hard red winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–217 e5 “Plants damaged in the fall appeared to recover, but ultimately exhibited a marked decrease in grain yield at spring harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–754 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Carbamate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentcarbamate nematicides e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.