Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil water availability decreased stomatal conductance of olive trees to 69.3 mmol/m2.s, versus 98.5 mmol/m2.s for irrigated trees.

Taxon: Olea europaeaOlea europaeat0
Treatment: low soil water availabilitye7
Outcome: stomatal conductancee7
Direction: decreaseinferrede7
Value: 69.3 mmol/m2.se7
Comparator: irrigated treese7

Verbatim

t0
“olive trees (Olea europaea L. cv. Chemlali Sfax)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–139

e7
“low soil water availability also affected (negatively) the net photosynthetic rate in rain-fed orchards (10.3 µmol/m2.s for irrigated trees v. 5.3 µmol/m2.s in rain-fed trees on sandy soil) and stomatal conductance (98.5 mmol/m2.s v. 69.3 mmol/m2.s)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1695

Title

Effects of water stress and soil type on photosynthesis, leaf water potential and yield of olive trees (Olea europaea L. cv. Chemlali Sfax)

B. Ben Rouina; A. Trigui; R. d’Andria; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1071/ea05206

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture of phosphorus activation agent with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizer increased sugar beet income by 35.17% compared with the check.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment: mixture phosphorus activation agent of soil with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizere4
Outcome: incomee6
Direction: increasede6
Value: 35.17%e6
Comparator: checke3

Verbatim

e4
“The effect of the mixture phosphorus activation agent of soil with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizer was the best”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–577

e0
“Obvious effects of increasing yield and income were obtained by applying phosphorus activation agent of soil in sugar beet with paper pot and field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147

e6
“the income increased by35.17%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–645

e3
“under pure quantity of P 2 O 5 in field fertilizer decrease d by21.74%than check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–725

Title

Analysis on effect of phosphorus activation agent of soil on sugar beet

Lijun Xia Zhongguo tangliao 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting phosphatic fertilizer in the new paddy field reduced total protein production per unit area compared with NPK plots.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: non-application plots of phosphatic fertilizere7
Outcome: total protein production per unit areae7
Direction: reducede7
Comparator: N P K plotse7
Setting: new paddy field with great P-absorptive coefficiente7

Verbatim

t0
“Protein Content in Rice Grain”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40

e7
“in case of new paddy field with great P-absorptive coefficient, non-application plots of phosphatic fertilizer increased percent of protein by 20-30%compared with N P K plots, but these plots were accompanied remarkably by the decrease in grain yield, consequently reduced the total protein production per unit area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2373

Title

Studies on Protein Content in Rice Grain : II. Effects of the fertilization on protein content and protein produtction in paddy grain

Kazuo HONJYO Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1971. doi:10.1626/jcs.40.190

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of shootse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 3–10%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of podse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 5–12%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of seedse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 13–18%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: seed weighte4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 1–5%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nitrite concentration promoted the growth of Italian ryegrass.

Taxon: Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume0
Treatment: Nitrite nitrogen in culture solutione1
Outcome: growthe2
Direction: promotede2
Value: 2 ppme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Even Italian ryegrass, which is moderately tolerant to the acidity of soil, the yield showed decrease, when the pH in the culture solution was lowered to 4.3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–370

e1
“Nitrite nitrogen in culture solution was injurious to the growth of milk vetch at the low concentration of 2 ppm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3575–3687

e2
“However the growth of Italyan ryegrass was promoted at the same concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3689–3766

Title

Studies on the Relation between the Tolerance of Crops to Soil Acidity and That to Low pH : (15) The effects of aluminum, hydrogen ion, lime, magnecium, nitrate and nitrite of varying concentrations on the growth of Italian ryegrass and milk vetch.

Shugo CHAMURA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1967. doi:10.1626/jcs.36.4_361

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At pH 4.3 the yield of Italian ryegrass decreased.
Intervention effect At pH 4.3 the calcium and phosphorus percentages of Italian ryegrass dry weight were suppressed.
Intervention effect At pH 4.3 the growth of milk vetch decreased markedly.
Intervention effect At pH 4.3 the calcium and potassium percentages of milk vetch were suppressed.
Intervention effect Raising the pH of milk vetch culture from 5.3 to 6.3 decreased its yield; the inorganic matter percentage was also decreased.
Intervention effect Aluminum at 0.5 ppm inhibited the growth of milk vetch.
Intervention effect The same aluminum concentration promoted the growth of Italian ryegrass.
Intervention effect Aluminum at 5 ppm severely suppressed the dry weight percentage of phosphorus in both forage crops and strongly reduced their growth.
Observation The dry weight percentages of calcium, potassium and magnesium were suppressed in milk vetch.
Intervention effect A low concentration of both lime and magnesium was highly injurious to plant growth.
Observation The optimum calcium concentration in the culture solution was higher for milk vetch than for Italian ryegrass.
Intervention effect Increasing lime in the nutrient solution increased calcium percentage in the top of the plants.
Intervention effect Raising lime from low to standard level increased potassium percentage.
Intervention effect Lowering lime and magnesium together greatly increased the potassium percentage of Italian ryegrass.
Observation The optimum magnesium concentration in the culture solution was lower for milk vetch than for Italian ryegrass.
Intervention effect At low magnesium concentration, calcium percentage of milk vetch increased.
Intervention effect Raising magnesium from standard to high level decreased phosphorus and potassium percentages.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrate decreased the yield of milk vetch markedly, with a decrease in leaf-blade starch.
Intervention effect Nitrite nitrogen at 2 ppm was injurious to the growth of milk vetch.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing N by 28% improved the available filled ratio of sink in Huayou 8305 relative to conventional N.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Material: Huayou 8305e4
Treatment: Reduction of N by 28%e4
Outcome: available filled ratio of sinke4
Direction: improvede4
Comparator: conventional Ne1

Verbatim

e1
“Compared by conventional N,reduction of N by 28% would maintain or promote the rice source and sink coordination,which resulted in no significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–430

e4
“Reduction of N by 28% improved sink capacity and ratio of spikelets No.and leaf area in Yuejingsimiao 2 and Guixiangzhan,improved available filled ratio of sink in Huayou 8305,while there was no significant difference in Tianyou 998”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–875

Title

Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Source and Sink Characteristics of Early /Late Season Rice in South China and Their Mechanism

MO Zhao-we 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% relative to conventional N caused no significant decrease in rice yield.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% would maintain or promote rice source and sink coordination relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Yuejingsimiao 2 by 11.99% relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Guixiangzhan by 5.51% relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Huayou 8305 by 6.46% relative to conventional N.
Mechanism The yield increase under 28% N reduction is attributed to enhanced photosynthesis or sheath and stem transfer ability in rice.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% improved sink capacity, spikelet ratio and leaf area of Yuejingsimiao 2 relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% improved sink capacity, spikelet ratio and leaf area of Guixiangzhan relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% produced no significant difference in sink and source characteristics of Tianyou 998.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment changed berry total sugars relative to control.

Taxon: GrapevinesVitist0
Treatment: Same treatmentse0
Outcome: total sugarse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 18.43 & 19.20 %e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Same treatments gave higher increase in the chemical characteristics of berries as SSC%, total sugars and total anthocyanin content in berry skin (20.17 & 21.00%), (18.43 & 19.20 %) and (78.98 & 79.82 mg/100g FW), while it gave the lowest decrease in acidity% (0.26 & 0.24 %) as compared with that of control (18.27 & 18.17 %), (13.83 & 14.20 %), (28.71 & 18.17 mg/100g FW) and (0.48 & 0.46 %), in 2014 and 2015 seasons,…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1872

t0
“Grapevines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72

Title

Effect of Fulvic Acid and Some Nutrient Elements on King Ruby Grapevines Growth, Yield and Chemical Properties of Berries.

M. Mostafa; M. EL-Boray; EL. El-Baz; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2017. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.39630

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Fulvic acid, Mg and K increased bud burst relative to control in 2014 and 2015.
Intervention effect Fulvic acid, Mg and K increased fertility relative to control in 2014 and 2015.
Intervention effect Fulvic acid, Mg and K increased shoot length relative to control.
Intervention effect Fulvic acid, Mg and K increased leaf surface area relative to control.
Intervention effect Fulvic acid, Mg and K increased total chlorophyll content relative to control.
Intervention effect The treatment increased yield per vine relative to control.
Intervention effect The treatment changed berry SSC% relative to control.
Intervention effect The treatment changed berry total anthocyanin content in berry skin relative to control.
Intervention effect The treatment changed berry acidity% relative to control.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics