Paper · 2019 · Advanced Agritechnologies

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Purpose. In our experiment, effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area.Methods. In the first year we applied mechanical weed control in addition to pre-emergence herbicide (May 19, 2018) and 6–8 leaf chickpeas (June 20, 2018) in addition to post-emergence herbicide treatments. The year 2019 was different in that after the pre-emergence treatment (April 10, 2019), the post-emergence treatment of chickpeas with 6–8 leaf condition (May 15, 2019) was repeated in the budding state (June 18, 2019). The yield components one way analysis of variance was prepared using SPSS 22 software and graphic representation of the development of the plants was carried out Svab's cumulative yield analysis.Results. The effect of the treatments of 2018 and 2019 on the yield elements of chickpeas can be illustrated graphically in Figure 1 and Figure 2. For both years, the data are from plots of the ʻRealeʼ variety, where the 100% level is made up of the yield elements of the weed-free plots, and the yield elements of the other treatments are compared to this. Figure 1 shows that the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots the same crop elements. Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots. In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots. Conclusions. Our two-year weed survey results show that the later sowing time of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds. This is in complete agreement with the opinion of Nagy (2017), who found that sowing time determines the predominant weed species in a given area. At the same time, the statement of Kurnik (1970) was not confirmed, since in our experiment we proved in the case of ʻRealeʼ cultivar that the later sowing stock in 2018 gave higher yields than the plots with earlier sowing time in 2019. The changing weather caused by climate change makes the site characteristics of the given period much more unpredictable, so the yield is determined much more by the field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
did not control weedse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
number of shoots per unit areae2
Direction
lesse2
Value
15%e2
Comparator
weed-free control plotse2
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
did not control weedse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
number of podse2
Direction
lesse2
Value
45%e2
Comparator
weed-free control plotse2
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
did not control weedse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
number of seedse2
Direction
lesse2
Value
58%e2
Comparator
weed-free control plotse2
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
did not control weedse2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
weight of seedse2
Direction
lesse2
Value
49%e2
Comparator
weed-free control plotse2
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
treated only with pre-emergence treatmente3
Interactor
Weedse3weed
Outcome
number of shoots per unit areae3
Direction
lowere3
Value
3 %e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
treated only with pre-emergence treatmente3
Interactor
Weedse3weed
Outcome
number of podse3
Direction
lowere3
Value
23 %e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
treated only with pre-emergence treatmente3
Interactor
Weedse3weed
Outcome
number of seedse3
Direction
lowere3
Value
34%e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
treated only with pre-emergence treatmente3
Interactor
Weedse3weed
Outcome
seed weighte3
Direction
lowere3
Value
35 %e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of plants per unit areae4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
1%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of shootse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
3–10%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of podse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
5–12%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of seedse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
13–18%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
seed weighte4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
1–5%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
later sowing timee5
Interactor
warm-loving weedse5weed
Outcome
warm-loving weedse5
Direction
favorede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e5

“the later sowing time of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
later sowing stocke6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
earlier sowing timee6
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e6

“the later sowing stock in 2018 gave higher yields than the plots with earlier sowing time in 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2475 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
field factors developed during the growing seasone7
Outcome
yielde7
Comparator
calendar periode7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156 · show in text ↑
e7

“so the yield is determined much more by the field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2599–2720 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Pendimethalin led to higher growth parameters than the other herbicidal treatment.

    Integrated weed management in chickpea · 2013 · compared with quizalofop-p-ethyl 40 g/ha as post-emergence

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.