View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Improper N, P and K application could decrease grain yield .
TreatmentImproper application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium e0 Not reported Material Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Improper application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium could affect the nutrient contents and decrease the grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1117 t0 “Rice Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing tillage did not decrease cane and sugar yield .
TreatmentReduction of tillage operation e0 Outcomecane and sugar yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of tillage operation did not decrease the cane and sugar yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1484 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit at S1 caused a relative yield decrease .
Organ / stageearly vegetative (S1) e0 Outcomerelative decrease of yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The water deficit at early vegetative (S1) and pod filling to early maturing (S4) was sensitive to the relative decrease of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1318 t0 “Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–126 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Living mulch did not decrease apple yield compared with herbicide fallow.
Directiondid not decrease e1 Comparatorherbicide fallow e1 Verbatim
e0 “fruit of Malus domestica Borkh. cv. ‘Sampion’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–159 e1 “Compared to herbicide fallow, living mulch did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–372 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield tended to decrease at 60 kg/ha sulphur.
Treatmenthigher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) the yield tended to decrease in potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–620 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d solar radiation decrease d simulated maize yield .
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in solar radiation and decrease carbondioxide concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1664 t0 “yield of rainfed maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops showed no increase or a slight decrease in soybean seed yield in 2007 and 2009.
Directionno yield increase or slight yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 2007 and 2009 no yield increase or slight yield decrease was shown by the cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1264 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
Treatmentreducing plant density e0 Outcomeweekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing led to a slight initial yield undulation, then a decrease in yield , with a significant difference.
Treatmentdelayed sowing e1 Directionbegan to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The kind of rice Wanxian 98 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 e1 “The results indicated that delayed sowing would lead to slightly undulated yield firstly, and then began to decrease and the difference was significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–301 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.