View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Millet yield under BF did not decrease relative to PEF.
did not decrease e1 northern Loess Plateau of China e0 Verbatim
e0 “on millet, sorghum and corn with different growth periods on the northern Loess Plateau of China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–602 e1 “The yield under BF did not decrease in millet, while it was 8–15% lower in sorghum and corn than that under PEF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1162 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d biological yield .
Drought stress e0 biological yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress effect on biological yield showed a significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4195–4266 t0 “millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Millet yield was projected to decrease 2.6% below the current average of 1.8 tons per hectare per year under business as usual.
business-as-usual scenario e0 average current yields e0 Verbatim
e0 “This is likely to decrease millet yield s by 2.6% below the average current yield s of 1.8 tons per hectare per year under business-as-usual scenario. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–944 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly decrease d total fruit yield .
deficit irrigation e0 total fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation led to a significant decrease in total fruit yield and number of total fruits per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–801 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fitting relative ET to the Maas and Hoffman salinity yield response function showed a 10% decrease in ET per unit increase in ECe, with a threshold of 1 dS m-1.
electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (ECe) e1 threshold of 1 dS m−1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Experiments were conducted using lysimeters with two varieties of pomegranate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–671 e1 “Fitting the relative ET (ETr) to the Maas and Hoffman salinity yield response function showed a 10% decrease in ET per unit increase in electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (ECe) with a threshold of 1 dS m−1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1693 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderate deficit irrigation reduced pomegranate yield by 10% compared with full irrigation.
moderate deficit irrigation e0 full irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Trees receiving moderate deficit irrigation had a yield decrease of 10% in comparison to full irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–777 t0 “Pomegranate (Punica granatum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting at the end of May caused no corresponding decrease in seed yield .
Delaying planting until the end of May e0 no corresponding decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delaying planting until the end of May increased fibre yield s by an average of 35% with no corresponding decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1254 t0 “oilseed flax ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 Other claims from this paper (11) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer that selecting seed type flax would decrease powdery mildew resistance.
selection for seed type flax e0 Verbatim
e0 “selection for seed type flax would result in a decrease in such a resistance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2366 e1 “Powdery mildew resistance in flax ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1542 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed machine harvest decrease d seed yield through capsule dehiscence and shattering.
delayed machine harvest e0 capsule dehiscence and shattering e0 Verbatim
e0 “Due to delayed machine harvest, there was decrease in flax seed yield due to capsule dehiscence and shattering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1282 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors favor frequent irrigation to decrease surface relocation of water, despite only slight yield gains.
Frequent irrigation intervals e0 decrease surface relocation of water e0 Verbatim
e0 “Frequent irrigation intervals added only slightly to yield but are desirable in order to decrease surface relocation of water from high intensity LEPA application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2213 t0 “Grain Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In 2020 with 70 cm row spacing, increasing the seeding rate led to a significant decrease in grain yield of both sorghum hybrids.
row spacing of 70 cm, its increase e0 significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–28 e0 “on variants with row spacing of 70 cm, its increase led to a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2030 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation Averaged over three years, the Swat sorghum hybrid yielded 6.28 t/ha with 35 cm row spacing and a seeding rate of 180 thousand seeds/ha, the best variant. Observation Averaged over three years, the Flagg sorghum hybrid yielded 5.07 t/ha with 35 cm row spacing and a seeding rate of 180 thousand seeds/ha, the best variant. Intervention effect Increasing the seeding rate to 220 thousand units/ha did not give a significant increase in sorghum grain yield. Intervention effect Only in 2019, favourable for sorghum, did raising the seeding rate from 180 to 220 thousand units/ha significantly increase grain yield of the Flagg hybrid. Recommendation For Swat and Flagg sorghum hybrids and close biotypes under the hot, dry conditions of the area, a seeding rate of 180 thousand pieces/ha is recommended. Intervention effect In the less favourable year 2020, at 35 and 45 cm row spacing, grain yield of both hybrids did not differ statistically between seeding rates of 180 and 220 thousand pieces/ha. Observation In 2019 with 35 cm row spacing, the Flagg hybrid had its highest grain yield, 6.77 t/ha, at a seeding rate of 220 thousand pieces/ha. Observation In 2019 with 35 cm row spacing, the Swat hybrid had its highest grain yield, 5.51 t/ha, at a seeding rate of 220 thousand pieces/ha. Intervention effect In 2019 the Flagg hybrid at a seeding rate of 220 thousand pieces/ha significantly exceeded the yield at 180 thousand pieces/ha, by 0.16 t/ha. Observation In the Swat hybrid grain yield was at the same level at the two seeding rates, 5.51 and 5.45 t/ha. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “water stress caused a decrease in the values of the variables: grain yield , height, flowering, and threshing index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–533 t0 “grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in lentil growth and yield traits was greater in susceptible than resistant varieties.
susceptible group e0 resistant group e0 Verbatim
t0 “LENTIL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 e0 “this response was noticed higher in susceptible group as compared to resistant group ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–718 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
All lentil genotypes lost average grain yield under stress.
stress conditions e0 average grain yield e0 non-stress conditions e0 Verbatim
t0 “lentil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 e0 “All genotypes exhibited a decrease in average grain yield when subjected to stress conditions as compared to non-stress conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–819 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S uptake decrease d with cobalt levels.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “gradual decrease in S uptake with cobalt levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1060 t0 “lentil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Abiotic assaults decrease plant yield .
abiotic assaults e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants are exposed continuously in their natural environment to diverse abiotic assaults throughout life, which leads to a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The other mixture component usually has lower yield than its monoculture.
their own monoculture e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants of the other component usually show a decrease , relative to their own monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–237 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 25 lb P/acre, flooded field grain yield was 32 bu/acre lower than nonflooded field yield .
nonflooded field e0 Verbatim
e0 “32 bu/acre yield decrease in the flooded field, compared with the nonflooded field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7306–7388 e1 “plants with the lowest rate of 25 lb P/acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7219–7262 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% irrigation reduction decrease d yield to 53.1 t/ha, a 9.7% decrease .
decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 and by 40 % in option 4 led to a decrease in yield to 53.1 and 43.7 t/ha, respectively, but when the irrigation rate decrease s by 20 % in option 3, the yield decrease s only 9.7 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1817 e1 “spring planted potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–150 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield increase was correlated with a decrease in foliar late blight severity.
yield increasing e0 decreasing of foliar late blight disease severity e0 Not reported Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “yield increasing was correlated with decreasing of foliar late blight disease severity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1065 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The reduction in red clover seed yield under increased water stress was primarily caused by a decrease in floral fertility.
increased plant water stress e5 reduction in seed yield e5 a decrease in floral fertility e5 Verbatim
t0 “Red Clover Seed Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 e5 “The reduction in seed yield resulting from increased plant water stress was primarily caused by a decrease in floral fertility, and less conclusively, by reductions in flower number per unit area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1232 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated cutting tended to gradually decrease red clover biomass yield .
cut repeatedly e0 decrease gradually e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “After studied characteristics of regrowing red clover, the results indicated that when it was cut repeatedly in the same growth period, red clover reg rowth showed a tendency to decrease gradually in the time when reached the same growth period, plant height, weight and biomass yield , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–299 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High selenium nanoparticle doses decrease d green clover yield .
selenium nanoparticles e0 yield of green clover e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “high doses of sodium selenite and selenium nanoparticles decrease the yield of green clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–468 t0 “RED CLOVER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–109 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizing for maximum root yield cut early September return by $3l/acre.
maximum root yield e3 10–16 September e0 maximum net return e3 Verbatim
e0 “a $3l/acre decrease ($576 vs. $545) in the earliest (10–16 September) period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4755–4831 t0 “sugarbeet ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–68 e3 “fertilizing for maximum root yield (vs. maximum net return) required 78 to 88 lb/acre of additional N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4476–4577 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Zn concentration in tops associated with a 20% yield decrease was 740 ppm for sugarbeet.
Zinc concentrations in tops associated with a 20% YD e0 Verbatim
e0 “Zinc concentrations in tops associated with a 20% YD ranged from 240 ppm for field bean to 740 ppm for sugarbeet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1037 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect Grass species were the most sensitive to added soil Zn, with maximum dry matter yield decreases greater than 40%. Intervention effect Alfalfa, Alaska pea, tomato, lettuce, spinach and sugarbeet had dry matter yield decreases between 20 and 40% under added soil Zn. Intervention effect Field bean, snap bean, russet potato, white potato, clover and Perfection pea did not undergo a significant dry matter yield decrease under added soil Zn. Observation Zn concentration in tops associated with a 20% yield decrease was 240 ppm for field bean. Observation For most crops, Zn concentration in tops associated with a 20% yield decrease fell in a 400 to 600 ppm range. Observation The most sensitive species tolerated Zn additions of 200 to 300 ppm before undergoing a significant yield decrease. Observation Crops with a significant yield decrease from excess Zn were stunted but showed no discoloration, malformation or necrosis indicative of direct metal toxicity. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ww reduced root yield by 21 percent.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sugarbeet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–16 e0 “21 percent of root yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1031 e1 “caused to decrease 43 percent consumed water and 21 percent of root yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1031 e2 “Ww index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–899 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 60 kg zinc sulphate, yield tended to decrease .
60 kg ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O/ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at higher zinc level (60 kg ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O/ha) the yield tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–427 t0 “carrot (Daucus caroto L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–137 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease d by more than 20% in three carrot cultivars, the highest decrease among cultivars.
Amsterdamska, Berlikumer 2 and Perfekcja e4 highest decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “The highest decrease in the yield (above 20%) were found in three of carrot cultivars (Amsterdamska, Berlikumer 2 and Perfekcja) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–973 t0 “in carrot crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Carrot-dill intercropping significantly decrease d yield .
Carrot-dill intercropping e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Carrot-dill intercropping resulted in a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1859 t0 “CARROT (Daucus carota L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–118 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Punica granatum
Linum usitatissimum
Sorghum bicolor
Lens culinaris
Solanum tuberosum
Trifolium pratense
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Daucus carota