View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
Treatmentherbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in grain yield under water deficit was over expressed in durum wheat.
Outcomedecrease in grain yield e0 Directionover expressed e0 Verbatim
e0 “Generally, grain yield was higher in genotypes of bread wheat than that of durum wheat, but a decrease in grain yield was over expressed in durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1188 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The no-till yield decrease was more pronounced in GAL than SMA.
OutcomeYield differences e2 Directionmore pronounced decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with a more pronounced decrease in GAL than in SMA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–896 e1 “a clay-loam (GAL) and a sandy-clay-loam soil (SMA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–622 e2 “Yield differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–915 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Field sprouting in bunch groundnut varieties is associated with a 20 %-25 % yield decrease .
Materialbunch varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “Field sprouting in bunch varieties results in a 20 %-25 % yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–621 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut tested with the pathogen alone showed a 57% decrease in yield .
Treatmentpathogen alone e0 Interactorpathogen e0 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–130 e0 “when the pathogen alone was testeds 57% decrease in yield was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1038 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.
Treatmenthigh‐temperature conditions e3 OutcomePod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions e3 Directiondid not decrease e3 Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet had the greatest yield decrease under intercropping.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Pearl millet was the cereal with the greatest decrease in yield when intercropped ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1125 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed initiation caused a decrease in grain yield of tillers.
Outcomegrain yield of tillers e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 e0 “There was, however, an increase in the grain yield of main shoots which was offset by a proportional decrease in the grain yield of tillers. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–742 e1 “Delay in PI resulted in more leaves and tillers per plant, and greater leaf area, height and total dry matter. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–526 Other claims from this paper (12) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower Striga hermonthica densities gave a relatively larger decrease in pearl millet yield per Striga plant.
Treatmentlower densities e2 Outcomeyield per S. hermonthica plant e2 Directionlarger decrease e2 Verbatim
e1 “dynamics of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. on pearl millet ( Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum.) were studied in Sahelian Mali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–165 e2 “The results suggest that lower densities give a relatively larger decrease in yield per S. hermonthica plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1211 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in applied water decrease d the plant Cl threshold for seed yield reduction.
Treatmentdecrease in applied water e0 OutcomeClp threshold for seed yield reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 e0 “a decrease in applied water decrease d Clp threshold for seed yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1091 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under the same nitrogen rate, waterlogged GH01 had a greater yield decrease rate than ZS 9.
Outcomeyield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease rate of waterlogged GH01 was greater than that of ZS 9 under the same N rate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–628 t0 “rapeseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly decreased rapeseed seed yield. Intervention effect Nitrogen application alleviated waterlogging-related rapeseed yield loss. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, more nitrogen increased leaf photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity under the same watering conditions. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, more nitrogen decreased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities under the same watering conditions. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, waterlogging decreased leaf photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity. Intervention effect At seedling and bolting stages, waterlogging decreased starch and sucrose contents. Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities at seedling stage in both varieties. Intervention effect Waterlogging increased AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities at bolting stage in both varieties. Intervention effect At flowering, more nitrogen increased photosynthetic rate, Rubisco, AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities, and sucrose and starch contents in both varieties. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged plants of both varieties had increased photosynthetic rate and Rubisco activity. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged tolerant rapeseed had higher AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities. Intervention effect At flowering, waterlogged sensitive rapeseed had significantly lower AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities. Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased starch and sucrose content in both tolerant and sensitive varieties at flowering. Association Flowering-stage AGPase, SuSy and SPS activities were highly positively correlated with yield under nitrogen and waterlogging treatments. Intervention effect After waterlogging, carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds was enhanced in tolerant rapeseed. Intervention effect After waterlogging, carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds remained inhibited in sensitive rapeseed. Mechanism The authors attributed the yield difference between waterlogged varieties mainly to different carbohydrate translocation from leaves to seeds. Mechanism The authors identified flowering as the most important stage for nitrogen to positively regulate waterlogged rapeseed growth. Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in applied water decrease d the threshold of soil Na for seed yield reduction in rapeseed.
Treatmentdecrease in applied water e0 Outcomethreshold of Na in soil for seed yield reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–93 e0 “a decrease in applied water decrease d the threshold of Na in soil for seed yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–689 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
An unventilated, unenriched tomato house suffered a 13% yield decrease
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The yield of 2 crops of tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Tropic) was determined in CO 2 enriched, unventilated and conventionally ventilated greenhouses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–173 e3 “An unventilated, unenriched house suffered a 13% yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–812 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield reduction was associated with an approximately 25% decrease in individual fresh fruit weight.
Outcomeindividual fresh fruit weight e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 e0 “This yield reduction was not caused by the fruit number, but by an approximately 25% decrease in individual fresh fruit weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–916 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite tended to decrease fruit nitrate content.
Treatmentaddition of zeolites e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the nitrate content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2145–2178 e1 “addition of zeolites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–1955 t0 “tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine decline was accompanied by a decrease in fruit yield quality.
Outcomefruit yield quality e2 Verbatim
e2 “Syndromes of declined grapevine plants included growth retardant of shoot system and root-rot as well as decrease of grapevine fruit yield quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–307 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
Outcomebiological efficiency and yield indicators e3 Qualifierwithout a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
More than one post-sowing irrigation tended to decrease yield and water use efficiency.
TreatmentMore than one post-sowing irrigation e0 Outcomeyield and water use efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “More than one post-sowing irrigation tended to decrease yield and water use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–674 t0 “mustard ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Further rainfall decrease or increase combined with +-3 to 5 degC temperature change reduced the percent change in mustard yield .
Treatmentfurther decrease or increase (-30 to -10% and +30 to +40%) in rainfall combined with change in mean ambient temperature ±3 to ± 5°C e0 Outcomepercent change in mustard yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “further decrease or increase (-30 to -10% and +30 to +40%) in rainfall combined with change in mean ambient temperature ±3 to ± 5°C reduced the percent change in mustard yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1265 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mustard yield fell as salinity increased.
Treatmentsalinity levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “Germination and yield of mustard and peralmillet found to decrease with the increase in the salinity levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1419 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions in 2023 led to decrease d yield , decrease d fruit diameter and worse marketability compared to the chemical protection scheme.
Treatmentdry conditions in 2023 e0 Outcomedecrease in yield, a decrease in fruit diameter and a deterioration in their marketability e0 Comparatorchemical protection scheme e0 Verbatim
e0 “dry conditions in 2023 led to a decrease in yield , a decrease in fruit diameter and a deterioration in their marketability compared to the chemical protection scheme ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2733–2898 t0 “apple plantations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing yield was accompanied by increased return bloom.
ComparatorDecrease in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in yield was paralled by increased return bloom ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–852 t0 “Apple Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In the survey, 74.3% of respondents noticed lower apple yield than in 2019.
Comparatorthe year 2019 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Apple Pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 e0 “74.3% of the respondents noticed a decrease in yield compared to the year 2019 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–922 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 e1 “oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.
TreatmentYield enhancement e0 Outcomeprotein content of oat grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Oat cultivar Mures achieved 68% of its yield capacity, a significant yield decrease of 947 kg/ha.
Directiondecrease inferred e4 Qualifier68% from its yield capacity e4 Verbatim
e4 “such as the oat cultivar Mures which achieved 68% from its yield capacity, resulting a minus significant yield on 947 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1388 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower-third defoliation caused the smallest seed yield decrease relative to control.
Treatmentlower 1/3 defoliation e0 Directionlowest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the lowest decrease was observed in the lower 1/3 defoliation level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1305 t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper-third defoliation caused the largest seed yield decrease relative to control.
Treatmentupper 1/3 defoliation e0 Directionhighest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the highest decrease in the seed yield compared to the control were observed in the upper 1/3 defoliation levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1228 t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (16) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced branching and head count explained the lower seed yield per plant.
Outcomedecrease in seed yield per plant e0 Qualifierdecrease in the number of heads per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield per plant was caused by the decrease in the number of heads per plant, which resulted from the decrease in the number of branches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1888 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.