View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought produced the highest yield decrease at this grass site.
Verbatim
e1 “In case of drought there was the highest yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1156 e2 “grass type formed on the Little Cumania lowland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1083 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Grass yield was predicted to decrease in eastern Ireland under climate change.
Treatmentclimate change e1 Settingeast of the country e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grass yield was predicted to decrease in the east of the country due to summer drought stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–976 e1 “grass yield in Ireland due to climate change ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–237 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant-treated grass showed no decrease in yield and quality when the N rate was reduced by 20 to 25%
Treatmenttreated with the biostimulant e3 Outcomeyield and quality e3 Qualifierwhen the N rate was reduced by 20 to 25% e3 SettingField-based evaluations e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Field-based evaluations demonstrated no decrease in yield and quality from harvested and grazed grass treated with the biostimulant when the N rate was reduced by 20 to 25% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1346 Other claims from this paper (3) Association hypothesis original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Future climate change in Nepal, with higher temperatures and erratic rainfall, might decrease paddy productivity and yield .
Treatmentfuture climate change in Nepal e6 Outcomepaddy productivity and yield e6 Directiondecrease inferred e6 Verbatim
e0 “assess the impact of climate change on paddy yield in Bhaktapur, Nepal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–100 e6 “future climate change in Nepal, including higher temperatures and erratic rainfall, might have a negative impact on paddy productivity and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1946 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1% rise in seasonal pest-related queries was associated with a 0.028 t ha decrease in paddy yield , or 1.1% of the mean.
Qualifiera decrease of 1.1% of average paddy yields e0 Verbatim
e0 “an increase in seasonal pest attacks—proxied by a 1% increase in seasonal pest‐related queries from districts— decrease s paddy yield s by 0.028 t ha (i.e., a decrease of 1.1% of average paddy yield s). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1039 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CRU produced 7737 kg hm -2 grain yield , without a significant decrease from FP.
Outcomepaddy grain yield e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “paddy grain yield in CRU (7737 kg hm -2 ) and OPT (7379 kg hm -2 ) was not significantly decrease d compared with FP (7918 kg hm -2 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1650 t0 “paddy fields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher plant density compensated for biomass and yield decrease s per plant at the crop level.
Outcomecrop compensated for biomass and yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “at high plant density the crop compensated for biomass and yield decrease at the plant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–587 t0 “processing tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decline was related to average fruit weight rather than fruit number.
Comparatoraverage weight of the fruit e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was related to the average weight of the fruit rather than the number per plant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–706 e1 “The year effect on yield was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–387 e2 “processing tomato cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–189 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The planting model reportedly decrease s labor intensity.
TreatmentBroad Row and Unmoving Vine t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “It also can decrease labor intensity, increase yield , marketably enhance fruits ratio. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–488 t0 “processing Tomato ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–88 t1 “Broad Row and Unmoving Vine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
One and two times the recommended Si level could decrease the nitrogen application level to about 76 while producing the target yield .
Treatment1 and 2 times of recommended levels of Si fertilization e2 Outcomenitrogen application level e2 Comparatornon-Si amended treatment e3 Verbatim
e0 “Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) on a silt loam soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–380 e2 “1 and 2 times of recommended levels of Si fertilization could decrease nitrogen application level to about 76 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–784 e3 “to produce the target yield , the maximum yield in the non-Si amended treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–867 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
htd12 had a decrease in plant height compared with the wild type.
Verbatim
e0 “grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–109 e3 “compared with the wild type, htd12 had significantly lower concentrations of ent-2'-epi-5-deoxystrigol (epi-5DS), a native strigolactone, in both roots and root exudates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–932 e4 “resulting in an obvious increase in tiller number and decrease in plant height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1012 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower wet-season yield was mainly due to fewer spikelets per panicle.
Outcomespikelet number per panicle e0 Verbatim
e0 “mainly due to a decrease in the spikelet number per panicle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–486 t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–54 e1 “The yield was 38% lower in WS than in DS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–425 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Frequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha-1 sewage sludge can decrease CO2 emissions per unit yield in silage maize.
Treatmentfrequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha −1 doses of sewage sludge e5 Outcomedecrease CO 2 emissions per unit yield e5 Verbatim
e5 “frequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha −1 doses of sewage sludge can decrease CO 2 emissions per unit yield in silage maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1479 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of silage maize biomass yield under drought, as happened in the field.
Comparatoras happened in the field e1 Verbatim
e1 “AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of the biomass yield (B- yield ) of silage maize in response to drought as happened in the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–726 t0 “Silage Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation did not decrease grain crude oil percentage.
TreatmentDeficit irrigation e0 Outcomepercentage of crude oil e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Deficit irrigation decrease d grain yield and yield components except the percentage of crude oil and crude protein of grain, but improved the efficient use of irrigation water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1022 t0 “Silage Maize (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–152 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Seneca, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
Treatmentremoval of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 Directiondid not significantly decrease e5 Comparatorcontrol plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Kent, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
Treatmentremoval of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 Directiondid not significantly decrease e5 Comparatorcontrol plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jewel, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not significantly decrease yield relative to control plots.
Treatmentremoval of all primary or secondary buds e3 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e3 Comparatorcontrol plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced SYN5 yield by 15.4%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “waxy maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 e0 “The decrease in yield was 11.1 and 15.4% for YN7 and SYN5, respectively, owing to the decrease d grain weight and number. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–609 e1 “Post-silking drought increased the malondialdehyde content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–896 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced YN7 yield by 11.1%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “waxy maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–93 e0 “The decrease in yield was 11.1 and 15.4% for YN7 and SYN5, respectively, owing to the decrease d grain weight and number. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–609 e1 “Post-silking drought increased the malondialdehyde content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–896 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat reduced Suyunuo 5 grain yield by 31.3%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease rate of grain yield s for Suyunuo 5 and Yunuo 7 were 31.3 and 21.9% due to the reduced grain number and weight, respectively, indicating that Suyunuo 5 was more sensitive to heat stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1052 t0 “Waxy Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
One of three wheat cultivars showed a yield decrease under high seed-borne Fusarium .
Treatmenthigh level (average 47%) e2 Directionyield decrease e4 QualifierOne wheat cultivar out of three e4 Comparatorlow level of seed-borne Fusarium (average 4%) e2 Verbatim
e0 “Seed lots from different cultivars of oats (Avena sativa ), barley (Hordeum vulgare ) and wheat (Triticum aestivum ) were compared in yield tests at two sites in Quebec ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 e2 “For each cultivar, two seed lots were used, one with a low level of seed-borne Fusarium (average 4%) and the other with a high level (average 47%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–313 e4 “One wheat cultivar out of three sustained yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–655 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield
TreatmentIn-furrow phosphorus e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1709 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing densities of Malva neglecta and Rumex spinosus significantly decrease d the 1000-grain weight and grain yield of wheat.
Treatmentincreasing population densities of Malva neglecta and Rumex spinosus (from 3 to 12 plants/m2) e4 Outcome1 000-grain weight and grain yield e4 SettingPunjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 e0 “A study was carried out at Student's Farm, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during rabi 2010-11 and 2011-12 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 e4 “The results showed a significant decrease in number of tillers, effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1 000-grain weight and grain yield of wheat with increasing population densities of Malva neglecta and Rumex spinosus (from 3 to 12 plants/m2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1050 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall seed yield decrease d after defoliation.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The net effect was an overall decrease in yield following defoliation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–716 t0 “White Clover Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Slurry caused a smaller decrease in fixed nitrogen yield than mineral fertilizer when compared by their effects on ryegrass dry matter yield and nitrogen concentration.
Outcomeyield of N fixed e0 Qualifierthe fertilizer effect on dry matter yield and N concentration of perennial ryegrass e0 Comparatormineral N fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “When compared on the basis of the fertilizer effect on dry matter yield and N concentration of perennial ryegrass, the decrease in yield of N fixed due to treatment with cattle slurry was less than that due to mineral N fertilizer. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1071 t0 “white clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Propyzamide-associated increase in clover contribution accompanied a small decrease in total seasonal grass yield .
Treatmentpropyzamide application e0 Outcometotal seasonal yield of grass e0 Verbatim
e0 “large increases in clover contribution following propyzamide application were accompanied by small decrease s in total seasonal yield of grass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1700 e1 “White clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–21 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress may decrease the yield of aerobic rice.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “And the effect of four water regimes on phosphorus efficiency and water productivity of aerobic rice was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–229 e7 “Water stress may decrease the yield of aerobic rice,but promote water productivity and phosphorus efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1162 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Aerobic rice yield was 6% lower than flooded rice.
Verbatim
e0 “6% decrease in yield compared to flooded rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–485 t0 “aerobic rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under reduced irrigation yield declined by 7.9%–29.8%.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “aerobic rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 e0 “WUE increases by 1.9% ~ 27.7% with only 7.9% ~ 29.8% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–746 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.