Paper · 1990 · Grass and Forage Science

The effect of nitrogen in cattle slurry and mineral fertilizers on nitrogen fixation by white clover

L. NESHEIM; B. C. BOLLER; J. LEHMANN; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The influence of N in slurry or in mineral fertilizers on herbage yield and nitrogen fixation by white clover grown in mixed swards was investigated. Two levels of N in cattle slurry were compared with a range of mineral N fertilization. The percentage of N derived from symbiosis (% Nsym) was measured by the 15 N‐isotope dilution method. The measurements were made in spring 1987 in two 4‐year‐old field trials, and included two out of five harvests. The % N sym was approximately 90% without N fertilization. It decreased in response to both mineral N and N in slurry but did not fall below 63%. The sum of two harvests revealed that 51·2 kg N ha −1 were fixed in the absence of N fertilization. With 75 kg mineral N ha −1 or 50 m 3 cattle slurry ha −1 , the yield of fixed N decreased to 17·2 and 24·9 kg ha −1 , respectively. When compared on the basis of the fertilizer effect on dry matter yield and N concentration of perennial ryegrass, the decrease in yield of N fixed due to treatment with cattle slurry was less than that due to mineral N fertilizer. This was owing to the smaller extent of the depression in the proportion of white clover in the sward when the same amount of N was applied in cattle slurry, as compared with mineral fertilizer, although % N sym responded similarly to both types of N fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without nitrogen fertilization, white clover symbiotic nitrogen percentage was approximately 90%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
% N syme0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The % N sym was approximately 90% without N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen decreased symbiotic nitrogen percentage, which remained at least 63%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
mineral Ne0
Outcome
% N syme1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
did not fall below 63%e0
Comparator
without N fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It decreased in response to both mineral N and N in slurry but did not fall below 63%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“The % N sym was approximately 90% without N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry nitrogen decreased symbiotic nitrogen percentage, which remained at least 63%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
N in slurrye0
Outcome
% N syme1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
did not fall below 63%e0
Comparator
without N fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It decreased in response to both mineral N and N in slurry but did not fall below 63%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“The % N sym was approximately 90% without N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover fixed 51·2 kg N ha −1 across two harvests without nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
fixede0
Value
51·2 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
in the absence of N fertilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sum of two harvests revealed that 51·2 kg N ha −1 were fixed in the absence of N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 75 kg mineral N ha −1 decreased fixed nitrogen yield to 17·2 kg ha −1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
75 kg mineral N ha −1e0
Outcome
yield of fixed Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17·2e0
Qualifier
kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 75 kg mineral N ha −1 or 50 m 3 cattle slurry ha −1 , the yield of fixed N decreased to 17·2 and 24·9 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 50 m 3 cattle slurry ha −1 decreased fixed nitrogen yield to 24·9 kg ha −1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
50 m 3 cattle slurry ha −1e0
Outcome
yield of fixed Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24·9 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 75 kg mineral N ha −1 or 50 m 3 cattle slurry ha −1 , the yield of fixed N decreased to 17·2 and 24·9 kg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry caused a smaller decrease in fixed nitrogen yield than mineral fertilizer when compared by their effects on ryegrass dry matter yield and nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
cattle slurrye0
Outcome
yield of N fixede0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
the fertilizer effect on dry matter yield and N concentration of perennial ryegrasse0
Comparator
mineral N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared on the basis of the fertilizer effect on dry matter yield and N concentration of perennial ryegrass, the decrease in yield of N fixed due to treatment with cattle slurry was less than that due to mineral N fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry depressed the white clover proportion less than mineral fertilizer at equal nitrogen application.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
cattle slurrye0
Outcome
proportion of white clovere0
Direction
depressione0
Qualifier
the same amount of Ne0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the smaller extent of the depression in the proportion of white clover in the sward when the same amount of N was applied in cattle slurry, as compared with mineral fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiotic nitrogen percentage responded similarly to slurry and mineral nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst1
Treatment
cattle slurryt0
Outcome
% N syme0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
mineral fertilizerst0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although % N sym responded similarly to both types of N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“nitrogen in cattle slurry and mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
t1

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · organism · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.