Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

19,998 matchesgrouped into 10,638 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3,624 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine

More filters

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: Organic-1e0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: Organic-2e0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0 e1
Treatment: bacteria treatmentse0 e1
Outcome: grain yield and biological yielde0 e1
Direction: decreasee0 e1
Qualifier: almost halfe0 e1
Comparator: controle0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“Organic-1, Organic-2 and bacteria treatments were decrease the grain yield and biological yield on pea and faba bean, and this decrease on pea was almost half over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1250

e1
“The highest number of nodules per plant on pea was in bacteria inoculation (125.9) and control (121.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1448

Title

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

F. BASDEMIR; S. ELIS; S. IPEKESEN; et al. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2020. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-023

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected pea grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Inorganic nitrogen, organic fertilizers and bacterial inoculation significantly affected faba bean grain yield, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean grain yield to 2147 kg/ha, close to the control value of 2080 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Urea increased faba bean biological yield to 4956 kg/ha, close to the control value of 4690 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased pea grain and biological yield versus control.
Intervention effect Organic-1 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Organic-2 decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Bacterial treatment decreased faba bean grain and biological yield.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected pea nodule number.
Intervention effect Treatments significantly affected faba bean nodule number.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation gave the highest pea nodule number, 125.9 per plant.
Intervention effect Control pea plants had 121.5 nodules per plant, among the highest values.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under nitrogen treatment was 109.1.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-1 was 97.3.
Intervention effect Pea nodule number under Organic-2 was 109.3.

EFFECT OF SULPHUR, PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN ADDITION ON SOYBEAN PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased seed yield, straw yield.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Material: Giza 111e0
Treatment: S1 in the absence of P and Ne1
Outcome: seed yield, straw yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: without sulphur (S0)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean (Glycine max L.) seeds, variety Giza 111”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–168

e1
“Addition of S1 in the absence of P and N led to decrease seed yield, straw yield, weight of 100 seeds, oil yield, protein yield and soil pH and increase oil % in the seeds and soil EC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1163

e2
“and without sulphur (S0)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–464

Title

EFFECT OF SULPHUR, PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN ADDITION ON SOYBEAN PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY

R.H. Atia Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2005. doi:10.21608/jssae.2005.225255

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil%, oil yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased protein % and protein yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased available N, available P, soil pH.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased soil pH.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil % in the seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased soil EC.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased available P.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased available N.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 decreased available P in the soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased oil yield, protein yield.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Material: Giza 111e0
Treatment: S1 in the absence of P and Ne1
Outcome: oil yield, protein yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: without sulphur (S0)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean (Glycine max L.) seeds, variety Giza 111”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–168

e1
“Addition of S1 in the absence of P and N led to decrease seed yield, straw yield, weight of 100 seeds, oil yield, protein yield and soil pH and increase oil % in the seeds and soil EC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1163

e2
“and without sulphur (S0)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–464

Title

EFFECT OF SULPHUR, PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN ADDITION ON SOYBEAN PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY

R.H. Atia Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2005. doi:10.21608/jssae.2005.225255

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil%, oil yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased protein % and protein yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased available N, available P, soil pH.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased soil pH.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil % in the seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased soil EC.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased available P.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased available N.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 decreased available P in the soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased soil pH.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Material: Giza 111e0
Treatment: S1 in the absence of P and Ne1
Outcome: soil pHe1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: without sulphur (S0)e2

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean (Glycine max L.) seeds, variety Giza 111”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–168

e1
“Addition of S1 in the absence of P and N led to decrease seed yield, straw yield, weight of 100 seeds, oil yield, protein yield and soil pH and increase oil % in the seeds and soil EC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1163

e2
“and without sulphur (S0)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–464

Title

EFFECT OF SULPHUR, PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN ADDITION ON SOYBEAN PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY

R.H. Atia Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2005. doi:10.21608/jssae.2005.225255

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil%, oil yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen increased protein % and protein yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased available N, available P, soil pH.
Intervention effect Sulphur with phosphorus and nitrogen decreased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen decreased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased oil % in the seeds.
Intervention effect Sulphur without phosphorus and nitrogen increased soil EC.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased 100 seeds weight.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Phosphorus treatment increased available P.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased seed yield, straw yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased weight of 100 seeds.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased oil yield, protein yield.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 increased available N.
Intervention effect Nitrogen through N2 decreased available P in the soil.

STUDY OF PLANT DIFFUSATES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY FOR CONTROLLING EARLY BLIGHT DISEASE ON TOMATO PLANT 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rivoral decreased tomato early blight incidence.

Taxon: TOMATO PLANTSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Rivorale0
Outcome: disease incidencee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“diffusates of Thapsia garganica. Rivoral and Dithane M45 gaves the high level of protection and led to decrease disease incidence and increased plant yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1228

t0
“TOMATO PLANT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103

Title

STUDY OF PLANT DIFFUSATES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY FOR CONTROLLING EARLY BLIGHT DISEASE ON TOMATO PLANT

M. EI-Samman, Journal of Plant Production 2004. doi:10.21608/jpp.2004.238655

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Trigonella faenumgraecum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Allium sativum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Capsicum annaum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thymus vulgaris diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thapsis garganica diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Other diffusates had little effect on spore germination.
Intervention effect Thapsia garganica diffusate decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Dithane M45 decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Thapsia garganica diffusate increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Rivoral increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Dithane M45 increased tomato yield.
Observation Other diffusates did not differ significantly in infection percentage.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 was the best fungicide for reducing early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 increased tomato productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dithane M45 decreased tomato early blight incidence.

Taxon: TOMATO PLANTSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Dithane M45e0
Outcome: disease incidencee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“diffusates of Thapsia garganica. Rivoral and Dithane M45 gaves the high level of protection and led to decrease disease incidence and increased plant yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1228

t0
“TOMATO PLANT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103

Title

STUDY OF PLANT DIFFUSATES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY FOR CONTROLLING EARLY BLIGHT DISEASE ON TOMATO PLANT

M. EI-Samman, Journal of Plant Production 2004. doi:10.21608/jpp.2004.238655

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Trigonella faenumgraecum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Allium sativum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Capsicum annaum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thymus vulgaris diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thapsis garganica diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Other diffusates had little effect on spore germination.
Intervention effect Thapsia garganica diffusate decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Rivoral decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Thapsia garganica diffusate increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Rivoral increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Dithane M45 increased tomato yield.
Observation Other diffusates did not differ significantly in infection percentage.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 was the best fungicide for reducing early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 increased tomato productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thapsia garganica diffusate decreased tomato early blight incidence.

Taxon: TOMATO PLANTSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Thapsia garganicae0
Outcome: disease incidencee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“diffusates of Thapsia garganica. Rivoral and Dithane M45 gaves the high level of protection and led to decrease disease incidence and increased plant yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1228

t0
“TOMATO PLANT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103

Title

STUDY OF PLANT DIFFUSATES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY FOR CONTROLLING EARLY BLIGHT DISEASE ON TOMATO PLANT

M. EI-Samman, Journal of Plant Production 2004. doi:10.21608/jpp.2004.238655

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Trigonella faenumgraecum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Allium sativum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Capsicum annaum diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thymus vulgaris diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Thapsis garganica diffusate completely inhibited spore germination at low concentration.
Intervention effect Other diffusates had little effect on spore germination.
Intervention effect Rivoral decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Dithane M45 decreased tomato early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Thapsia garganica diffusate increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Rivoral increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Dithane M45 increased tomato yield.
Observation Other diffusates did not differ significantly in infection percentage.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 was the best fungicide for reducing early blight incidence.
Intervention effect Dithance M45 increased tomato productivity.

Impacts of long‐term fertilization on crop yield and microbial communities under rice–rapeseed rotation 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the PK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 12.5% per year compared with NPK.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: PKe1
Outcome: average annual decrease ratese1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 12.5%e1
Comparator: NPK treatmente1

Verbatim

t0
“rice–rapeseed rotation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103

e1
“Compared with the NPK treatment, the average annual decrease rates of rice and rapeseed yield in the PK, NK, and NP treatments were 12.5%, 18.1%, 6.4% and 33.1%, 54.8%, 16.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–753

Title

Impacts of long‐term fertilization on crop yield and microbial communities under rice–rapeseed rotation

Jifu Li; Guoyu Gan; Qianqian Zeng Agronomy Journal 2022. doi:10.1002/agj2.21264

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In the PK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 33.1% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 18.1% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 54.8% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rice yield decreased on average 6.4% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 16.0% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect Long-term fertilization significantly changed soil chemical properties, especially pH and available K content.
Intervention effect The NK treatment increased soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Intervention effect The PK and NP treatments had a reverse impact on soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Association Available K, pH and slowly available K were closely related to alterations of the dominant bacterial community.
Association Olsen-P, slowly available K and pH were significantly correlated with the fungal community.
Association Soil properties changed by fertilization had a more direct effect on crop yield than the microbial community.
Association The bacterial group had a higher influence than the fungal group on crop yield.
Recommendation A balanced NPK fertilization is an effective management strategy for soil biological fertility and sustainable crop yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the PK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 33.1% per year compared with NPK.

Taxon: rapeseedt0
Treatment: PKe1
Outcome: average annual decrease ratese1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 33.1%e1
Comparator: NPK treatmente1

Verbatim

t0
“rice–rapeseed rotation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103

e1
“Compared with the NPK treatment, the average annual decrease rates of rice and rapeseed yield in the PK, NK, and NP treatments were 12.5%, 18.1%, 6.4% and 33.1%, 54.8%, 16.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–753

Title

Impacts of long‐term fertilization on crop yield and microbial communities under rice–rapeseed rotation

Jifu Li; Guoyu Gan; Qianqian Zeng Agronomy Journal 2022. doi:10.1002/agj2.21264

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In the PK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 12.5% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 18.1% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 54.8% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rice yield decreased on average 6.4% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 16.0% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect Long-term fertilization significantly changed soil chemical properties, especially pH and available K content.
Intervention effect The NK treatment increased soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Intervention effect The PK and NP treatments had a reverse impact on soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Association Available K, pH and slowly available K were closely related to alterations of the dominant bacterial community.
Association Olsen-P, slowly available K and pH were significantly correlated with the fungal community.
Association Soil properties changed by fertilization had a more direct effect on crop yield than the microbial community.
Association The bacterial group had a higher influence than the fungal group on crop yield.
Recommendation A balanced NPK fertilization is an effective management strategy for soil biological fertility and sustainable crop yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the NK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 18.1% per year compared with NPK.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: NKe1
Outcome: average annual decrease ratese1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 18.1%e1
Comparator: NPK treatmente1

Verbatim

t0
“rice–rapeseed rotation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103

e1
“Compared with the NPK treatment, the average annual decrease rates of rice and rapeseed yield in the PK, NK, and NP treatments were 12.5%, 18.1%, 6.4% and 33.1%, 54.8%, 16.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–753

Title

Impacts of long‐term fertilization on crop yield and microbial communities under rice–rapeseed rotation

Jifu Li; Guoyu Gan; Qianqian Zeng Agronomy Journal 2022. doi:10.1002/agj2.21264

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In the PK treatment, rice yield decreased on average 12.5% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the PK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 33.1% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NK treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 54.8% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rice yield decreased on average 6.4% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect In the NP treatment, rapeseed yield decreased on average 16.0% per year compared with NPK.
Intervention effect Long-term fertilization significantly changed soil chemical properties, especially pH and available K content.
Intervention effect The NK treatment increased soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Intervention effect The PK and NP treatments had a reverse impact on soil microbial composition and diversity compared with NPK fertilization.
Association Available K, pH and slowly available K were closely related to alterations of the dominant bacterial community.
Association Olsen-P, slowly available K and pH were significantly correlated with the fungal community.
Association Soil properties changed by fertilization had a more direct effect on crop yield than the microbial community.
Association The bacterial group had a higher influence than the fungal group on crop yield.
Recommendation A balanced NPK fertilization is an effective management strategy for soil biological fertility and sustainable crop yield.

Effects Of Suckering On Vegetative Growth, Yield And Fruits Quality Of Manfalouty Pomegranate Under Assiut Environments 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bimonthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 70.71% compared with the untreated control

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: bimonthlye1
Outcome: total fresh weight of suckerse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 70.71%e1
Comparator: untreated controle1

Verbatim

t0
“Manfalouty Pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–93

e1
“Suckering monthly or bimonthly resulted in significant decrease in total fresh weight of suckers and or watersprouts. These reductions were expressed as 85.30 and 70.71%, respectively, compared to the untreated control (4026.46 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1021

Title

Effects Of Suckering On Vegetative Growth, Yield And Fruits Quality Of Manfalouty Pomegranate Under Assiut Environments

Hassan Abdel-Kawi Abdel-Galil Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008. doi:10.21608/ajas.2008.269697

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Monthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 85.30% compared with the untreated control
Intervention effect Suckering increased upper shoot length, number of leaves per shoot and leaf area
Intervention effect Suckering increased the carbohydrate/nitrogen (C/N) ratio of pomegranate
Intervention effect Suckering increased fruit set and fruit yield per tree
Intervention effect Suckering enhanced commercial yield percentage per tree
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering decreased fruit splitting
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased fruit weight
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased grain weight percentage
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased TSS, TSS/acid ratio and reducing sugars percentage of fruit
Recommendation Monthly or bimonthly comprehensive suckering is recommended for Manfalouty pomegranate tree vigour and high fruit yield

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 85.30% compared with the untreated control

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: Suckering monthlye1
Outcome: total fresh weight of suckerse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 85.30e1
Qualifier: expressed as 85.30 and 70.71%e1
Comparator: untreated controle1

Verbatim

t0
“Manfalouty Pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–93

e1
“Suckering monthly or bimonthly resulted in significant decrease in total fresh weight of suckers and or watersprouts. These reductions were expressed as 85.30 and 70.71%, respectively, compared to the untreated control (4026.46 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1021

Title

Effects Of Suckering On Vegetative Growth, Yield And Fruits Quality Of Manfalouty Pomegranate Under Assiut Environments

Hassan Abdel-Kawi Abdel-Galil Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008. doi:10.21608/ajas.2008.269697

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Bimonthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 70.71% compared with the untreated control
Intervention effect Suckering increased upper shoot length, number of leaves per shoot and leaf area
Intervention effect Suckering increased the carbohydrate/nitrogen (C/N) ratio of pomegranate
Intervention effect Suckering increased fruit set and fruit yield per tree
Intervention effect Suckering enhanced commercial yield percentage per tree
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering decreased fruit splitting
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased fruit weight
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased grain weight percentage
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased TSS, TSS/acid ratio and reducing sugars percentage of fruit
Recommendation Monthly or bimonthly comprehensive suckering is recommended for Manfalouty pomegranate tree vigour and high fruit yield

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Suckering enhanced commercial yield percentage per tree

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: Suckering monthlye1
Outcome: commercial yield percentage/treee3
Direction: enhancede3
Comparator: untreated controle3

Verbatim

t0
“Manfalouty Pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–93

e1
“Suckering monthly or bimonthly resulted in significant decrease in total fresh weight of suckers and or watersprouts. These reductions were expressed as 85.30 and 70.71%, respectively, compared to the untreated control (4026.46 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1021

e3
“Additionally, it induced significant increase in fruit set, fruit yield/tree and enhanced commercial yield percentage/tree, compared to the untreated control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1325

Title

Effects Of Suckering On Vegetative Growth, Yield And Fruits Quality Of Manfalouty Pomegranate Under Assiut Environments

Hassan Abdel-Kawi Abdel-Galil Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008. doi:10.21608/ajas.2008.269697

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Monthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 85.30% compared with the untreated control
Intervention effect Bimonthly suckering reduced total fresh weight of suckers by 70.71% compared with the untreated control
Intervention effect Suckering increased upper shoot length, number of leaves per shoot and leaf area
Intervention effect Suckering increased the carbohydrate/nitrogen (C/N) ratio of pomegranate
Intervention effect Suckering increased fruit set and fruit yield per tree
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering decreased fruit splitting
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased fruit weight
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased grain weight percentage
Intervention effect Comprehensive suckering increased TSS, TSS/acid ratio and reducing sugars percentage of fruit
Recommendation Monthly or bimonthly comprehensive suckering is recommended for Manfalouty pomegranate tree vigour and high fruit yield

Investigation the Effect of Irrigation Levels on Peppermint Yield and Water Productivity under Salinity Stress 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot fresh weight by 12.7, 28.5 and 34.0 percent.

Taxon: PeppermintMentha ×piperitae1
Treatment: irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4e2
Outcome: shoot fresh weightse2
Direction: decreasee2
Value: 12.7, 28.5, and 34.0 percente2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“yield and yield components of Peppermint in the experimental research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–204

e2
“irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4 has resulted in a decrease in shoot fresh weights (to 12.7, 28.5, and 34.0 percent), shoot dry weights (to 3.6, 11.6, and 11.6 percent), and root dry weights (to 6.7, 12.4, and 14.6 percent), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1102

Title

Investigation the Effect of Irrigation Levels on Peppermint Yield and Water Productivity under Salinity Stress

Jamali, S.; Banejad, H.; Safarizadehsani, A.; et al. Journal of Water and Soil Science 2022. doi:10.47176/jwss.26.1.43421

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot fresh weight by 15.8, 28.4 and 30.1 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot dry weight by 7.1, 11.5 and 11.5 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced root dry weight by 4.6, 9.2 and 9.2 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot dry weight by 3.6, 11.6 and 11.6 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced root dry weight by 6.7, 12.4 and 14.6 percent.
Intervention effect Interaction of salinity and water stress decreased peppermint water productivity.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was highest, at 3.54 Kgm-3, under the EC1I4 treatment.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was lowest, at 2.06 Kgm-3, under the EC3I1 treatment.
Intervention effect Maximum peppermint dry yield was obtained under the EC1I4 treatment.
Recommendation The EC1I4 treatment is recommended for irrigation of peppermint.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot dry weight by 3.6, 11.6 and 11.6 percent.

Taxon: PeppermintMentha ×piperitae1
Treatment: irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4e2
Outcome: shoot dry weightse2
Direction: decreasee2
Value: 3.6, 11.6, and 11.6 percente2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“yield and yield components of Peppermint in the experimental research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–204

e2
“irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4 has resulted in a decrease in shoot fresh weights (to 12.7, 28.5, and 34.0 percent), shoot dry weights (to 3.6, 11.6, and 11.6 percent), and root dry weights (to 6.7, 12.4, and 14.6 percent), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1102

Title

Investigation the Effect of Irrigation Levels on Peppermint Yield and Water Productivity under Salinity Stress

Jamali, S.; Banejad, H.; Safarizadehsani, A.; et al. Journal of Water and Soil Science 2022. doi:10.47176/jwss.26.1.43421

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot fresh weight by 15.8, 28.4 and 30.1 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot dry weight by 7.1, 11.5 and 11.5 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced root dry weight by 4.6, 9.2 and 9.2 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot fresh weight by 12.7, 28.5 and 34.0 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced root dry weight by 6.7, 12.4 and 14.6 percent.
Intervention effect Interaction of salinity and water stress decreased peppermint water productivity.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was highest, at 3.54 Kgm-3, under the EC1I4 treatment.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was lowest, at 2.06 Kgm-3, under the EC3I1 treatment.
Intervention effect Maximum peppermint dry yield was obtained under the EC1I4 treatment.
Recommendation The EC1I4 treatment is recommended for irrigation of peppermint.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced root dry weight by 6.7, 12.4 and 14.6 percent.

Taxon: PeppermintMentha ×piperitae1
Treatment: irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4e2
Outcome: root dry weightse2
Direction: decreasee2
Value: 6.7, 12.4, and 14.6 percente2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“yield and yield components of Peppermint in the experimental research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–204

e2
“irrigation with EC2, EC3, and EC4 has resulted in a decrease in shoot fresh weights (to 12.7, 28.5, and 34.0 percent), shoot dry weights (to 3.6, 11.6, and 11.6 percent), and root dry weights (to 6.7, 12.4, and 14.6 percent), respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1102

Title

Investigation the Effect of Irrigation Levels on Peppermint Yield and Water Productivity under Salinity Stress

Jamali, S.; Banejad, H.; Safarizadehsani, A.; et al. Journal of Water and Soil Science 2022. doi:10.47176/jwss.26.1.43421

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot fresh weight by 15.8, 28.4 and 30.1 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced shoot dry weight by 7.1, 11.5 and 11.5 percent.
Intervention effect Reducing water to 15, 30 and 45 percent of field capacity reduced root dry weight by 4.6, 9.2 and 9.2 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot fresh weight by 12.7, 28.5 and 34.0 percent.
Intervention effect Irrigation with EC2, EC3 and EC4 reduced shoot dry weight by 3.6, 11.6 and 11.6 percent.
Intervention effect Interaction of salinity and water stress decreased peppermint water productivity.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was highest, at 3.54 Kgm-3, under the EC1I4 treatment.
Intervention effect Peppermint water productivity was lowest, at 2.06 Kgm-3, under the EC3I1 treatment.
Intervention effect Maximum peppermint dry yield was obtained under the EC1I4 treatment.
Recommendation The EC1I4 treatment is recommended for irrigation of peppermint.

PEDIGREE SELECTION FOR YIELD IN GRAIN SORGHUM POPULATION, [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.03% across locations.

Treatment: Selection for grain yield/plante0
Outcome: days to 50% floweringe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: -7.03 %e0
Comparator: bulk samplee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Selection for grain yield/plant was accompanied by decrease in days to 50% flowering of -7.43, -6.66% and -7.03 %, increase in 1000-grain weight of 4.27, 5.70 and 4.89% over the bulk sample at Sohag, Qena and across locations, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–908

Title

PEDIGREE SELECTION FOR YIELD IN GRAIN SORGHUM POPULATION, [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

H. I Ali; M. A. Ali; K. M. Mahmoud Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2006. doi:10.21608/ajas.2006.274157

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 5.87% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 3.72% at Qena.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased yield by an average 4.98% across locations.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.43 at Sohag.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 6.66% at Qena.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.27% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 5.70% at Qena.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.89% across locations.
Observation Synergistic selection at Sohag performed better than antagonistic selection at Qena.
Observation Sufficient genotypic variability remained for yield and other traits.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in thousand grain weight decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in days to flowering decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Selection increased plant height variability.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 44.26% at Sohag versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 27.20% at Qena versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 36.56% across locations versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 flowered earlier than bulk by 4.44, 4.01 and 4.22% at Sohag, Qena and across locations.
Observation Family 6 had heavier grains than bulk by 21.25, 11.30 and 16.57%.
Observation Direct yield selection was effective in improving this sorghum material.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.43 at Sohag.

Treatment: Selection for grain yield/plante0
Outcome: days to 50% floweringe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: -7.43e0
Comparator: bulk samplee0
Setting: Sohage0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Selection for grain yield/plant was accompanied by decrease in days to 50% flowering of -7.43, -6.66% and -7.03 %, increase in 1000-grain weight of 4.27, 5.70 and 4.89% over the bulk sample at Sohag, Qena and across locations, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–908

Title

PEDIGREE SELECTION FOR YIELD IN GRAIN SORGHUM POPULATION, [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

H. I Ali; M. A. Ali; K. M. Mahmoud Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2006. doi:10.21608/ajas.2006.274157

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 5.87% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 3.72% at Qena.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased yield by an average 4.98% across locations.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 6.66% at Qena.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.03% across locations.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.27% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 5.70% at Qena.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.89% across locations.
Observation Synergistic selection at Sohag performed better than antagonistic selection at Qena.
Observation Sufficient genotypic variability remained for yield and other traits.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in thousand grain weight decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in days to flowering decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Selection increased plant height variability.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 44.26% at Sohag versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 27.20% at Qena versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 36.56% across locations versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 flowered earlier than bulk by 4.44, 4.01 and 4.22% at Sohag, Qena and across locations.
Observation Family 6 had heavier grains than bulk by 21.25, 11.30 and 16.57%.
Observation Direct yield selection was effective in improving this sorghum material.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 6.66% at Qena.

Treatment: Selection for grain yield/plante0
Outcome: days to 50% floweringe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: -6.66%e0
Comparator: bulk samplee0
Setting: Qenae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Selection for grain yield/plant was accompanied by decrease in days to 50% flowering of -7.43, -6.66% and -7.03 %, increase in 1000-grain weight of 4.27, 5.70 and 4.89% over the bulk sample at Sohag, Qena and across locations, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–908

Title

PEDIGREE SELECTION FOR YIELD IN GRAIN SORGHUM POPULATION, [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

H. I Ali; M. A. Ali; K. M. Mahmoud Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2006. doi:10.21608/ajas.2006.274157

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 5.87% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased grain yield per plant by 3.72% at Qena.
Intervention effect Two selection cycles increased yield by an average 4.98% across locations.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.43 at Sohag.
Intervention effect Selection decreased days to 50% flowering by 7.03% across locations.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.27% at Sohag.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 5.70% at Qena.
Intervention effect Selection increased thousand grain weight by 4.89% across locations.
Observation Synergistic selection at Sohag performed better than antagonistic selection at Qena.
Observation Sufficient genotypic variability remained for yield and other traits.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in thousand grain weight decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Phenotypic and genotypic variance in days to flowering decreased slightly after the second cycle.
Intervention effect Selection increased plant height variability.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 44.26% at Sohag versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 27.20% at Qena versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 yield rose 36.56% across locations versus bulk.
Observation Family 6 flowered earlier than bulk by 4.44, 4.01 and 4.22% at Sohag, Qena and across locations.
Observation Family 6 had heavier grains than bulk by 21.25, 11.30 and 16.57%.
Observation Direct yield selection was effective in improving this sorghum material.

Effect of terminal heat stress on osmolyte accumulation and gene expression during grain filling in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 11%-23%.

Treatment: late-sowne0
Outcome: grain yield per plante0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 11%-23%e0
Comparator: timely sowne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“whereas a decrease in grain-filling duration, 1000-kernel weight (8%-25%), and grain yield per plant (11%-23%) was observed under the late-sown compared to the timely sown.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–689

Title

Effect of terminal heat stress on osmolyte accumulation and gene expression during grain filling in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Pooja Sihag; Upendra Kumar; Vijeta Sagwal; et al. The Plant Genome 2023. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20307

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf total soluble sugar by 25%-47%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf proline by 7%-15%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf glycine betaine by 22%-34%.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased grain filling duration.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased 1000 kernel weight by 8%-25%.
Association Heat tolerant genotypes had maximum osmolyte content relative to sensitive genotypes.
Association Expression of ten heat responsive genes increased significantly as temperature increased.
Association Most genes were expressed more strongly in WH730 and then WH1218 than in heat sensitive genotypes.
Observation WH730 performed best for osmolyte accumulation, grain yield, and gene expression under heat stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased grain filling duration.

Treatment: late-sowne0
Outcome: grain-filling duratione0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: timely sowne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“whereas a decrease in grain-filling duration, 1000-kernel weight (8%-25%), and grain yield per plant (11%-23%) was observed under the late-sown compared to the timely sown.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–689

Title

Effect of terminal heat stress on osmolyte accumulation and gene expression during grain filling in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Pooja Sihag; Upendra Kumar; Vijeta Sagwal; et al. The Plant Genome 2023. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20307

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf total soluble sugar by 25%-47%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf proline by 7%-15%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf glycine betaine by 22%-34%.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased 1000 kernel weight by 8%-25%.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 11%-23%.
Association Heat tolerant genotypes had maximum osmolyte content relative to sensitive genotypes.
Association Expression of ten heat responsive genes increased significantly as temperature increased.
Association Most genes were expressed more strongly in WH730 and then WH1218 than in heat sensitive genotypes.
Observation WH730 performed best for osmolyte accumulation, grain yield, and gene expression under heat stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased 1000 kernel weight by 8%-25%.

Treatment: late-sowne0
Outcome: 1000-kernel weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8%-25%e0
Comparator: timely sowne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“whereas a decrease in grain-filling duration, 1000-kernel weight (8%-25%), and grain yield per plant (11%-23%) was observed under the late-sown compared to the timely sown.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–689

Title

Effect of terminal heat stress on osmolyte accumulation and gene expression during grain filling in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Pooja Sihag; Upendra Kumar; Vijeta Sagwal; et al. The Plant Genome 2023. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20307

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf total soluble sugar by 25%-47%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf proline by 7%-15%.
Intervention effect Late sowing significantly increased flag leaf glycine betaine by 22%-34%.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased grain filling duration.
Intervention effect Late sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 11%-23%.
Association Heat tolerant genotypes had maximum osmolyte content relative to sensitive genotypes.
Association Expression of ten heat responsive genes increased significantly as temperature increased.
Association Most genes were expressed more strongly in WH730 and then WH1218 than in heat sensitive genotypes.
Observation WH730 performed best for osmolyte accumulation, grain yield, and gene expression under heat stress.

Sweet corn growth, yield, and lignocellulose decomposition on Excelzyme-treated Histosol 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best Excelzyme dosage decreased lignin content by 32.69% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.

Treatment: best dosage of Excelzymee1
Outcome: lignine1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 32.69 %e1
Comparator: untreated Histosole1
Setting: upper 0 – 15 cme1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1
“The best dosage of Excelzyme was 2.000 ml plot - 1 that decrease lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content by 32.69 %, 24,43 %, and 5.80 % in the upper 0 – 15 cm respectively compared to the untreated Histosol”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1177

Title

Sweet corn growth, yield, and lignocellulose decomposition on Excelzyme-treated Histosol

P. Prawito; M. Handayani; W. Herman; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202337303019

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Excelzyme application decreased lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in Histosol compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased cellulose content by 24.43% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased hemicellulose content by 5.80% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased lignin by 25.92% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased cellulose by 21.11% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased hemicellulose by 7.05% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect soil pH at both depths.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect sweet corn growth and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best Excelzyme dosage decreased cellulose content by 24.43% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.

Treatment: best dosage of Excelzymee1
Outcome: cellulosee1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 24,43 %e1
Comparator: untreated Histosole1
Setting: upper 0 – 15 cme1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1
“The best dosage of Excelzyme was 2.000 ml plot - 1 that decrease lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content by 32.69 %, 24,43 %, and 5.80 % in the upper 0 – 15 cm respectively compared to the untreated Histosol”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1177

Title

Sweet corn growth, yield, and lignocellulose decomposition on Excelzyme-treated Histosol

P. Prawito; M. Handayani; W. Herman; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202337303019

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Excelzyme application decreased lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in Histosol compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased lignin content by 32.69% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased hemicellulose content by 5.80% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased lignin by 25.92% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased cellulose by 21.11% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased hemicellulose by 7.05% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect soil pH at both depths.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect sweet corn growth and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best Excelzyme dosage decreased hemicellulose content by 5.80% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.

Treatment: best dosage of Excelzymee1
Outcome: hemicellulosee1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 5.80 %e1
Comparator: untreated Histosole1
Setting: upper 0 – 15 cme1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1
“The best dosage of Excelzyme was 2.000 ml plot - 1 that decrease lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content by 32.69 %, 24,43 %, and 5.80 % in the upper 0 – 15 cm respectively compared to the untreated Histosol”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1177

Title

Sweet corn growth, yield, and lignocellulose decomposition on Excelzyme-treated Histosol

P. Prawito; M. Handayani; W. Herman; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2023. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202337303019

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Excelzyme application decreased lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose in Histosol compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased lignin content by 32.69% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect The best Excelzyme dosage decreased cellulose content by 24.43% in the upper 0–15 cm compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased lignin by 25.92% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased cellulose by 21.11% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme decreased hemicellulose by 7.05% in the 15–30 cm depth compared with untreated Histosol.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect soil pH at both depths.
Intervention effect Excelzyme at various dosages did not significantly affect sweet corn growth and yield.

Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis 6

Show all 6 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat and salinity stress changed growth and yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: HS and SSe0
Outcome: growth and yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“This study’s findings reveal that HS and SS caused a significant decrease in the growth and yield of wheat by increasing electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production; sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation; and decreasing relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content, total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA), as well as nutrient upta…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1270

Title

Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis

Ansa Aouz; Imran Khan; Muhammad Bilal Chattha; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12142606

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA).
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed nutrient uptake (potassium, K; calcium, Ca; and magnesium, Mg).
Intervention effect Silicon application changed growth and yield under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, RWC, antioxidant activity under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed TSP, FAA accumulation, and nutrient uptake (Ca, K, and Mg) under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed EL, electrolyte leakage, MDA, and H2O2 under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed uptake of Na+ and Cl− under stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat and salinity stress changed sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: HS and SSe0
Outcome: sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulatione0
Direction: increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“This study’s findings reveal that HS and SS caused a significant decrease in the growth and yield of wheat by increasing electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production; sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation; and decreasing relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content, total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA), as well as nutrient upta…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1270

Title

Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis

Ansa Aouz; Imran Khan; Muhammad Bilal Chattha; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12142606

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed growth and yield.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA).
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed nutrient uptake (potassium, K; calcium, Ca; and magnesium, Mg).
Intervention effect Silicon application changed growth and yield under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, RWC, antioxidant activity under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed TSP, FAA accumulation, and nutrient uptake (Ca, K, and Mg) under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed EL, electrolyte leakage, MDA, and H2O2 under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed uptake of Na+ and Cl− under stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat and salinity stress changed relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: HS and SSe0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
Direction: decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“This study’s findings reveal that HS and SS caused a significant decrease in the growth and yield of wheat by increasing electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production; sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation; and decreasing relative water content (RWC), chlorophyll and carotenoid content, total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA), as well as nutrient upta…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1270

Title

Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis

Ansa Aouz; Imran Khan; Muhammad Bilal Chattha; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12142606

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed growth and yield.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed electrolyte leakage (EL), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) accumulation.
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed total soluble proteins (TSP), and free amino acids (FAA).
Intervention effect Heat and salinity stress changed nutrient uptake (potassium, K; calcium, Ca; and magnesium, Mg).
Intervention effect Silicon application changed growth and yield under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, RWC, antioxidant activity under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed TSP, FAA accumulation, and nutrient uptake (Ca, K, and Mg) under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed EL, electrolyte leakage, MDA, and H2O2 under stress.
Intervention effect Silicon application changed uptake of Na+ and Cl− under stress.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

THE EFFECT OF COMMERCIAL ORGANICAND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND RHIZOBIUM INOCULATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) 6

EFFECT OF SULPHUR, PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN ADDITION ON SOYBEAN PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY 6

STUDY OF PLANT DIFFUSATES WITH ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY FOR CONTROLLING EARLY BLIGHT DISEASE ON TOMATO PLANT 6

Impacts of long‐term fertilization on crop yield and microbial communities under rice–rapeseed rotation 6

Effects Of Suckering On Vegetative Growth, Yield And Fruits Quality Of Manfalouty Pomegranate Under Assiut Environments 6

Investigation the Effect of Irrigation Levels on Peppermint Yield and Water Productivity under Salinity Stress 6

PEDIGREE SELECTION FOR YIELD IN GRAIN SORGHUM POPULATION, [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] 6

Effect of terminal heat stress on osmolyte accumulation and gene expression during grain filling in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) 6

Sweet corn growth, yield, and lignocellulose decomposition on Excelzyme-treated Histosol 6

Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis 6