View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In the far future all regional climate models predicted a decrease of peanut yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “During the far future, all RCMs predict a decrease of the peanut yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1377 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Field sprouting in bunch groundnut varieties is associated with a 20 %-25 % yield decrease .
bunch varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “Field sprouting in bunch varieties results in a 20 %-25 % yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–621 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Selection for yield could decrease meat and oil content.
meat and oil content e0 Verbatim
e0 “but would decrease meat and oil content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1926 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that TE application is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield .
application of TE e0 decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the application of TE is a potential strategy to decrease lodging probability without affecting sunflower yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1054 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality.
excessive fertilization e0 cucumber yield and quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “But excessive fertilization also could cause the decrease of cucumber yield and quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–776 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect under the same levels of nitrogen and potassium,increasing the ratio of organic fertilizer was helpful to the increase of cucumber yield and quality. Intervention effect The commercial quality and flavor of cucumber were improved with the increase of fertilizer Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect the yield and the contents of dry matter,soluble sugar,soluble protein,VC in fruit increased too. Intervention effect At the same time,the nitrate content in cucumber also increased rapidly. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderately conductive irrigation water caused no appreciable yield decrease .
water with moderate electrical conductivity e0 without an appreciable decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The cucumbers are irrigated with water with moderate electrical conductivity without an appreciable decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
reducing plant density e0 weekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
Diseases may decrease marketable root yield .
yield of marketable roots e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease the yield of marketable roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–313 t0 “table beet ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–117 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (4) Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Salinity above 8 dS /m may decrease alfalfa yield by 50 %.
Verbatim
e0 “8 dS /m (4091 ppm, 70 mM), levels that may decrease alfalfa yield by 50 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–599 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The largest projected alfalfa yield decrease is 9% in Siirt.
Verbatim
e0 “the maximum yield decrease will be noted in Siirt (9%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1728 e1 “Alfalfa yield for years 2020-2060 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1052 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease .
low-temperature day e0 Verbatim
e0 “a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% yield decrease .
post-flowering frost e0 Verbatim
e0 “Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% decrease and a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased plant number compensated for the decrease in yield components.
increased plant number e0 decrease of yield components e0 Verbatim
e0 “increased plant number compensated for decrease of yield components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1174 t0 “Hashem chickpea variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Also assuming uniform synthesis efficiency caused an additional 4% decrease in simulated yield .
assuming that Y g also was uniform e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “assuming that Y g also was uniform led to an additional decrease of 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1579 t0 “Sorghum Grain Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aging for up to 48 d was followed by a gradual decrease in sorghum yield .
aging of up to 48 d e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “this was followed by a gradual decrease in yield following aging of up to 48 d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–398 t0 “Accelerated Aging of Sorghum Seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
sorghum grain yield e0 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also involved in the yield decrease .
1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Flowering and pod formation had the greatest yield decrease after defoliation.
flowering and pods formation e0 highest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest decrease was detected for flowering and pods formation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–847 e1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–693 e2 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Goytacazes) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–262 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selecting for pods per area was expected to decrease yield , seeds per pod, and seed weight.
yield, seeds/pod and seed weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Direct selection for pods/m 2 would decrease yield , seeds/pod and seed weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1584 t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
low combined densities e0 do not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was projected to greatly decrease untreated winter oilseed rape yield in southern England.
greatly decrease e0 southern England e1 Verbatim
e0 “greatly decrease yield of untreated winter oilseed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1022 e1 “southern England the combination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–778 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Factors raising Ca concentration while lowering Mg concentration were associated with reduced yield .
Ca but decrease in Mg e0 Verbatim
e0 “each factor leading to increase in Ca but decrease in Mg concentration resulted in yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1045 t0 “winter oilseed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop such as lettuce without yield loss or phytonutrient decrease .
without yield loss or phytonutrients decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Coir-based growing media can be reused for another short-cycle crop, like lettuce, without yield loss or phytonutrients decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1227 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
Zn-peptide treatment e0 fresh shoot yield e0 slight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Arachis hypogaeat0
Helianthus annuus
Cucumis sativus
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Medicago sativa
Cicer arietinum
Sorghum
Phaseolus vulgaris_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Lactuca sativa