View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not significantly decrease through the eight-day irrigation interval.
continuous flooding (W) e1 Verbatim
e0 “without any significant decrease in yield up to 8W ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–955 t0 “RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 e1 “continuous flooding (W) without any significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The flour- yield decrease in Bayraktar 2000 was not significant.
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in flour yield was not significant for cv Bayraktar 2000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–926 t0 “wheat kernel size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara showed a statistically insignificant straw yield decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The Lara variety showed an insignificant decrease in the straw yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1207 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The maize yield decrease from delayed emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones.
yield stability zones e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in maize yield caused by the delay in emergence was not statistically related to yield stability zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2129–2244 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain yield decrease in Ant-Pop was insignificant.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the grain yield of Ant-Pop cultivar was insignificiant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–606 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield .
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 e1 “oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.
Verbatim
e0 “Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41 e1 “There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry.
delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced e0 yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 e0 “The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The increased latex yield did not significantly decrease tree growth over three years.
increase of latex yield e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 over a period of three years e0 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 e0 “The increase of latex yield did not result in a significant decrease in the growth of trees over a period of three years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–645 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning treatments did not significantly decrease yield per tree.
‘Wilking’ mandarins t0 yield in kg per tree e0 without significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “without significant decrease of yield in kg per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–296 t0 “‘Wilking’ Mandarins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–74 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Retaining leaves 6–20 while removing others did not significantly decrease total plant dry matter yield .
removing all leaves except 6–20 e0 total dry matter yield of the whole plant e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–573 e1 “Sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not decrease significantly until more than 60 cm of plot area was removed.
more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed e0 yield of the genotypes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Generally, no significant decrease in yield of the genotypes was detected until more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–544 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Minor leaf injuries did not significantly decrease yield .
Minor leaf injuries e0 did not result in significant decreases e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Minor leaf injuries which were designed to upset the elaboration and translocation of synthesized plant food did not result in significant decrease s in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1549 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 no significant effect e1 under most of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither sulphur dioxide, water supply nor sulphur content of the nutrient supply affected alfalfa nitrogen content.
sulphur dioxide e1 nitrogen content e1 no_change inferred e1 water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “neither sulphur dioxide, water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply had significant effect on nitrogen content of the alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1785 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying one, two or three kinds of nucleosides did not significantly decrease aberration frequency.
one, two or three kinds of nucleosides e0 aberration frequency e0 did not bring about any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Simultaneous application of one, two or three kinds of nucleosides did not bring about any significant decrease in aberration frequency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–589 e1 “The influence of mitomycin C, chloramphenicol, ATP and various nucleosides on the yield of X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations was examined with the ovular tissue cells of Trillium kamtschaticum . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At the last autumn cut, yield did not significantly correlate with annual yield .
Ladino White Clover t0 last cutting time in autumn season e0 correlation coefficients between yield in each cutting time and total yield a year e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “And there was not a significant correlation between both factors at the last cutting time in autumn season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1735 e1 “The correlation coefficients between yield in each cutting time and total yield a year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1560 t0 “Ladino White Clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
shading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Glycine max
Solanum lycopersicum
Avena sativa
Nicotiana tabacum
Hevea brasiliensis
Zea mays subsp. mays
Medicago sativa
Trillium camschatcense