View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield .
tree enrichment e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree enrichment did not decrease landscape-scale oil palm yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–818 t0 “oil palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer that managing the identified factors could decrease the soybean yield gap.
decrease the yield gap e0 Verbatim
e0 “managing magnitude of these variables will decrease the yield gap in soybean crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–932 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Neang Tamm had minimal yield decrease at high temperature.
Verbatim
e0 “yield decrease under high temperature condition was minimal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 t1 “Although the local genotype, Neang Tamm, had lower yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–928 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% ET c, yield did not decrease economically.
Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine t0 without an economic decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without an economic decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1253 t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–151 e1 “with 50% ET c ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1281 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield .
reducing plant density e0 weekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt resistant hybrids showed no grain yield decrease under salinity.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yield of Pioneer‐3906 was significantly reduced under salinity because of inhibited kernel setting, whereas the SR hybrids showed no decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–981 t0 “Enhancing maize grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In simulation, a 5 C decrease in maximum temperature enhanced yield by up to 19.2%.
a −5°C decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 e0 “a −5°C decrease enhanced yield s by up to 19.2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1085 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Future drought losses around flowering decrease to about 9% of water-limited yield .
losses from drought e0 about 9% of water limited yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “losses from drought around flowering will decrease and account for about 9% of water limited yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–478 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nongda 108 maize yield did not decrease under recommended nicosulfuron.
did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of the sensitive maize variety (Ditian 8) decrease d by 37.09%, whereas that of the resistant maize variety (Nongda 108) did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1170 t0 “nicosulfuron ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
applying mycorrhizal fungi e0 mycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine max
Solanum lycopersicum
Cucumis sativus
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Helianthus annuus