View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Constitutive PrDA1-1 expression in Arabidopsis decrease yield .
constitutive expression e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PrDA1-1 was strongly expressed during both the early and late stages of seed development, and its constitutive expression in Arabidopsis reduced seed number but increased seed weight, which ultimately led to a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–876 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal moisture, mixture yield did not decrease because spring wheat yield increased.
total yield of the mixture e0 did not decrease e0 With optimal moisture e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With optimal moisture, they reduced the yield of the vetch sowing, but the total yield of the mixture did not decrease due to the increase in the yield of spring wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–342 Other claims from this paper (4) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the effective irrigation rate reversed the decrease in summer maize yield .
effective irrigation rate e6 summer maize yield e6 increase inferred e6 Verbatim
e6 “The increase in the effective irrigation rate can reverse the decrease in the summer maize yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1271 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% irrigation reduction decrease d yield to 53.1 t/ha, a 9.7% decrease .
decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the irrigation rate by 20 % in option 3 and by 40 % in option 4 led to a decrease in yield to 53.1 and 43.7 t/ha, respectively, but when the irrigation rate decrease s by 20 % in option 3, the yield decrease s only 9.7 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1817 e1 “spring planted potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–150 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment.
Chemical fertilization reduction e5 fruit yield and quality e5 did not decrease e5 except for the 1/3N treatment e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Bayberry Orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–137 e5 “Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–868 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain yield decrease at higher salinity was larger in the salt-resistant variety than in salt-sensitive varieties.
salt resistant variety e5 decrease in grain yield e5 salt sensitive varieties e5 Verbatim
t0 “Rice cultivars responses to different salinity levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e5 “The decrease in grain yield was larger in salt resistant variety, than in salt sensitive varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1271 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Depending on soil erosion, grain yield can decrease by 10–80%.
erosion of the soil e2 Verbatim
e2 “depending on the erosion of the soil, the yield can decrease by 10–80% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–900 e4 “improvement of the nutritional regime and an increase in soil cultivation help reduce the negative impact of drought on the productivity of grain crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1139 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
T4 had the smallest fresh- yield decrease , 15.83%, versus T5.
Verbatim
e0 “Comparing with T5, the lowest and highest decrease in the fresh yield of Brassica Chinensis was found under T4(15.83%) and T3(41.63%) respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1457 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Straw burial saved 7.34% irrigation water in SS. Intervention effect Straw burial saved 9.50% irrigation water in WS. Intervention effect All treatments other than T5 decreased soil TN in D10 and D30 layers in both seasons. Intervention effect Straw burial gave the highest increase in D20 soil TN. Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf number, 35.78%, versus T5. Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf area index, 66.27%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in shoot dry biomass, 16.95%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in root dry biomass, 6.14%, versus T5. Intervention effect T3 had the greatest fresh-yield decrease, 41.63%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the greatest increase in WUEs and PFPs versus T5. Mechanism The authors conclude straw burial can store nitrogen in the upper root zone and alleviate effects of limited nitrogen and water. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
T3 had the greatest fresh- yield decrease , 41.63%, versus T5.
Verbatim
e0 “Comparing with T5, the lowest and highest decrease in the fresh yield of Brassica Chinensis was found under T4(15.83%) and T3(41.63%) respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1457 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Straw burial saved 7.34% irrigation water in SS. Intervention effect Straw burial saved 9.50% irrigation water in WS. Intervention effect All treatments other than T5 decreased soil TN in D10 and D30 layers in both seasons. Intervention effect Straw burial gave the highest increase in D20 soil TN. Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf number, 35.78%, versus T5. Intervention effect T3 produced the highest decrease in leaf area index, 66.27%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in shoot dry biomass, 16.95%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the highest increase in root dry biomass, 6.14%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 had the smallest fresh-yield decrease, 15.83%, versus T5. Intervention effect T4 gave the greatest increase in WUEs and PFPs versus T5. Mechanism The authors conclude straw burial can store nitrogen in the upper root zone and alleviate effects of limited nitrogen and water. Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For cocoa agroforestry adopters, a one-millimeter rainfall decrease reduced yield by 2.17 kg/ha.
one-millimeter decrease in rainfall e0 Verbatim
e0 “A one-millimeter decrease in rainfall significantly reduces yield by 2.17 kg/ha for adopters and 2.84 kg/ha for non-adopters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1128 t0 “cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Arabidopsise0
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Solanum tuberosum
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Theobroma cacao