View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance did not change significantly with salt up to 0.225%.
salt concentration e1 net photosynthetic rate(P n) and stomatal conductance(C s) e1 did not change significantly e1 less than or equal to 0.225% e1 Verbatim
e0 “The germination rates of two wheat varieties showed a decrease response to the increase of salt concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–417 e1 “When the salt concentration was less than or equal to 0.225%,the net photosynthetic rate(P n) and stomatal conductance(C s) did not change significantly with the increase of salt concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–610 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
AWD irrigation reduced CH4 production by 22.6–41.5% relative to continuous flooding.
amount of CH4 production e1 continuous flooding irrigation (CF) e2 Verbatim
t0 “Incorporation of rice straw mitigates CH4and N2O emissions in water saving paddy fields of Central Vietnam ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 e1 “AWD methods reduced the amount of CH4 production (22.6–41.5%) and increased N2O emission (25–26%) without any decrease in rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–837 e2 “in comparison to continuous flooding irrigation (CF) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–335 Other claims from this paper (7) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A relationship exists between genotype-specific salinity tolerance and the accumulation of proline in the leaves and roots.
leaves and roots e7 accumulation of proline e7 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Abstract The performance of selected salt-tolerant genotypes of barley [Hordeum vulgare (L.)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 e7 “It is can concluded from our findings that a relationship exists between genotype-specific salinity tolerance and the accumulation of proline in the leaves and roots along with higher uptake of sodium and chloride, lower decrease in the water and osmotic potential, less inhibition in the yield under salinity stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2217 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
CaCO3 percentage was associated with lower available potassium in almond orchard soils.
available potassium e1 decrease inferred e1 percentage of CaCO3 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Several almond orchards have been studied in south-eastern Spain to characterize and evaluate the soils dedicated to the cultivation of different cultivars in order to identify the parameters that most affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–214 e1 “The percentage of gravels, high in several of the soils studied, correlated negatively with the clay content and Water Holding Capacity (WHC) as did the percentage of CaCO3 with available potassium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–413 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity, the lower R:FR value increased photochemical quenching in tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value.
the lower R: FR value e2 photochemical quenching e5 a higher R: FR e5 Verbatim
t0 “Exposure to lower red to far-red light ratios improve tomato tolerance to salt stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 e2 “the lower R: FR value caused a decrease in both the superoxide anion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1054 e5 “showed a higher actual quantum yield of photosynthesis (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), and photochemical quenching (qP) than those exposed to a higher R: FR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1494 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity, a lower R:FR value significantly increased growth, proline content and chlorophyll content of tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value. Intervention effect Under salinity, a lower R:FR value significantly increased the net photosynthesis rate of tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value. Intervention effect Under salinity, a lower R:FR value decreased malondialdehyde in tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value decreased superoxide anion generation in tomato seedlings. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value decreased hydrogen peroxide generation in tomato seedlings. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value increased superoxide dismutase activity in tomato seedlings. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value increased peroxidase and catalase activities in tomato seedlings. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value increased the actual quantum yield of photosynthesis in tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value. Intervention effect Under salinity, the lower R:FR value increased electron transport rate in tomato seedlings compared with a higher R:FR value. Intervention effect The salinity tolerance induced by a lower R:FR value disappeared in the tomato phyB1 mutant. Recommendation Growing tomato under a lower R:FR value could improve seedling salinity tolerance. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 34.7 t·ha-1, tomato height differed from control by -4% at week 6.
plant height differences e0 decrease inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “plant height differences of -4%, 6% and 4% were recorded between application rate of 34.7 t·ha-1 and the control at week 6, 9 and 12, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–980 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SM1 decrease d wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens e1 symbiont Grain-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Grain-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%). It decrease d over SM0 at SM2 (22%) and SM1 (8%), and over SM1 at SM2 (2.7-fold). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1047 e1 “seed inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, i.e. no Pseudomonas fluorescens (SM0), with ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM1) and with phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–464 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
P90 interacting with SM2 e0 phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens e1 symbiont Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “TGW and straw-P increased for P90 interacting with SM2 over SM0 (8.6 and 29%) and SM1 (6 and 14%), and for SM1 over SM0 (2.5 and 13%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1395 e1 “seed inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, i.e. no Pseudomonas fluorescens (SM0), with ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM1) and with phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–464 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
P90 interacting with SM2 e0 phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens e1 symbiont Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “TGW and straw-P increased for P90 interacting with SM2 over SM0 (8.6 and 29%) and SM1 (6 and 14%), and for SM1 over SM0 (2.5 and 13%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1395 e1 “seed inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, i.e. no Pseudomonas fluorescens (SM0), with ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM1) and with phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–464 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain size did not change with N and P.
did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 e0 “The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of … ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Prunus dulcis
Solanum lycopersicum
Helianthus annuus