View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate for the yield decrease in napiergrass.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1335 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
herbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In the far future all regional climate models predicted a decrease of peanut yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “During the far future, all RCMs predict a decrease of the peanut yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1377 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not significantly decrease through the eight-day irrigation interval.
continuous flooding (W) e1 Verbatim
e0 “without any significant decrease in yield up to 8W ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–955 t0 “RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 e1 “continuous flooding (W) without any significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation without intensive nutrient management may decrease maize yield .
without intensive nutrient management e0 Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation is not enough in itself without intensive nutrient management, since it may lead to yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1622 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The cranberry yield decrease vanished the year after outlet redesign.
redesigning the outlet e0 the following year e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cranberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 e0 “This yield decrease vanished the following year after redesigning the outlet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–360 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Se100 tended to decrease yield .
Se100 treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Se100 treatment had a tendency to decrease bulb size and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–629 e1 “applied to onion ‘Hercules’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–267 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying all N to V9 did not significantly decrease corn yield .
Delaying all the N to V9 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 e0 “Delaying all the N to V9 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1125 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
low combined densities e0 do not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Cenchrus purpureuse3
Triticum aestivum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Arachis hypogaea
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Allium cepa
Zea mays subsp. mays_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus