View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in sugarcane yield may financially challenge many mills.
financially challenge many mills e2 Verbatim
e0 “similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–170 e2 “Capacity within the sugar industry value chain is considered sufficient to absorb an increase in yield , but a decrease may financially challenge many mills ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1172 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
BN 2 spraying tended to decrease Micronaire.
BN-2 Regulator t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Micronaire tends to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–473 t0 “BN-2 Regulator on Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excess nitrogen reduced tomato yield .
excessive N application e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “excessive N application resulted in yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–317 t0 “TOMATO PLANTING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
False smut infection decrease d rice yield .
false smut t1 pathogen Verbatim
e0 “led to decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–313 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 t1 “False Smut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Physical suppression did not decrease total forage yield versus controls in renovation and later years.
physical suppression e0 total forage yields e0 did not decrease e0 renovation and post-renovation years e0 Verbatim
e0 “physical suppression did not decrease total forage yield s in the renovation and post-renovation years when compared with controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1731 t0 “clovers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each 1% increase in virus incidence was associated with a yield decrease of 12 kg/ha at site A and 6 kg/ha at site B.
1% increase in virus incidence e1 12 (site A) and 6 (site B) kg/ha e1 Verbatim
e0 “field experiments with Brassica napus (canola, oilseed rape) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–260 e1 “for each 1% increase in virus incidence there was a yield decrease of 12 (site A) and 6 (site B) kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1286 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
tree-height was the relative decrease .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree-height was the relative decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was lower at 180 mm than at 250 mm row spacing.
yield decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decreasing was lower at a row spacing of 180 mm than at 250 mm. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–943 t0 “spring cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional iron did not decrease yield when nutrient-solution iron was sufficient.
additional iron supply e0 did not inhibit e0 iron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional iron supply did not inhibit the growth and decrease the yield even if the iron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1136 e1 “cucumbers (Cucumis sativus cv. Jessica) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–217 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease caused by waterlogging was compensated to a level similar to Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 through enhanced nodule growth in the recovery stage.
because of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage e3 Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 e3 Verbatim
t0 “supernodulating soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–109 e2 “Kanto100 and SS2-2 exhibits a marked decrease in dry matter production by waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1841 e3 “yield decrease is compensated to level similar to that of Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 because of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1994 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutum
Solanum lycopersicum
Oryza sativa
Trifolium_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Prunus persica
Cucumis sativus
Glycine max