Abstract
AUSTRALIA is predicted to be hotter and generally drier, with more frequent extreme events, in coming decades similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations,. To assess the direct and indirect climate change impacts on the cane-growing regions of Queensland, and adaptive capacity, projections for 2030 were considered using (i) a review of literature on climate/plant interactions and sugarcane physiology, (ii) a brief qualitative assessment in collaboration with industry stakeholders throughout the value chain, and (iii) a quantitative estimate of yield potential and the efficacy of an adaptation strategy using an eco-physiological model of plant growth. The review and qualitative assessment indicated that the greatest impacts are likely to be experienced on the grower sector of the industry. Productivity gains/losses will ultimately depend on the availability of a number of resources, particularly water, and the plants physiological response to relative changes in all climate variables. Capacity within the sugar industry value chain is considered sufficient to absorb an increase in yield, but a decrease may financially challenge many mills. The paper then focused on providing more quantitative estimates of impact using the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to estimate yield potential in response to temperature and rainfall projections up to 2030 for the most northerly (Mossman) and southerly (Rocky Point) regions of the Queensland sugarcane industry. Response surfaces produced from model simulations suggest yield losses are likely be greater in the cooler southern regions due to increased water stress. The vast majority of adaptation strategies identified by stakeholders as potentially useful were an extension and enhancement of the current practices used to manage sugarcane production in the highly variable Australian climate. An eco-physiological model (APSIM) was used for the first time to assess the adaptive strategy of changing the date of planting in a sugarcane production system. The simulations suggest that yield potential will increase marginally if the planting date occurs earlier than presently practised in the south, while a delay in planting date in the north may increase productivity by the year 2030. This study showed that collaborative research between industry stakeholders from all sectors and the use of an ecophysiological modelling tool, such as APSIM, can aid in the identification of critical areas of climate change impact, quantify these impacts and assist in the identification of adaptation strategies at a regional scale. Introduction Sugarcane has been commercially grown on the north-eastern coastal plains and hinterlands of Australia since 1862. The production area today is over 2000 km long and regions can be categorised by the major climatic constraints that they impose on production. Potential yield can be limited in the northern region of Queensland by low levels of radiation associated with extensive cloud cover and annual rainfall in excess of 3000 mm.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest climate change impacts are likely to fall on the grower sector of the sugarcane industry.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e1“The review and qualitative assessment indicated that the greatest impacts are likely to be experienced on the grower sector of the industry”
Claim · model-written summary
Industry capacity is considered sufficient to absorb an increase in sugarcane yield.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e2“Capacity within the sugar industry value chain is considered sufficient to absorb an increase in yield, but a decrease may financially challenge many mills”
Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in sugarcane yield may financially challenge many mills.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e2“Capacity within the sugar industry value chain is considered sufficient to absorb an increase in yield, but a decrease may financially challenge many mills”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane productivity gains or losses depend ultimately on resource availability, particularly water.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e3“Productivity gains/losses will ultimately depend on the availability of a number of resources, particularly water”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated sugarcane yield losses are likely greater in the cooler southern regions because of increased water stress.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e4“Response surfaces produced from model simulations suggest yield losses are likely be greater in the cooler southern regions due to increased water stress”
Claim · model-written summary
The vast majority of stakeholder-identified adaptation strategies were extensions and enhancements of current sugarcane production practices.
Verbatim
e5“The vast majority of adaptation strategies identified by stakeholders as potentially useful were an extension and enhancement of the current practices used to manage sugarcane production in the highly variable Australian climate”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting earlier than presently practised in the south is projected to increase sugarcane yield potential marginally.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e6“The simulations suggest that yield potential will increase marginally if the planting date occurs earlier than presently practised in the south, while a delay in planting date in the north may increase productivity by the year 2030”
Claim · model-written summary
A delay in planting in the north may increase sugarcane productivity by 2030.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- a delay in planting date in the northe6
- Outcome
- productivitye6
- Direction
- increasee6
- Qualifier
- by the year 2030e6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e6“The simulations suggest that yield potential will increase marginally if the planting date occurs earlier than presently practised in the south, while a delay in planting date in the north may increase productivity by the year 2030”
Claim · model-written summary
Collaborative research with stakeholders and an eco-physiological model can help identify critical areas of sugarcane climate change impact.
Verbatim
e0“similar to that expected in most sugarcane producing nations”
e7“can aid in the identification of critical areas of climate change impact”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.