View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower seed yield in later fruit was mainly due to lower mean seed weight.
later fruits e0 decrease in mean seed weight e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield in later fruits was due mainly to a decrease in mean seed weight rather than a decrease in the number of seeds per fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–964 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At Manhattan in 2007, yield did not decrease significantly until the final planting date.
delayed planting dates t1 did not decrease e0 final planting date in 2007 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 e0 “yield at Manhattan, KS, did not decrease significantly until the final planting date in 2007 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1068 t1 “delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Red light caused a similar prolonged decrease in PSII photon yield in red- and yellow-senescing leaves.
PSII photon yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “red light induced a similar, prolonged decrease in PSII photon yield in both red-and yellow-senescing leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1604 t0 “Red-Osier Dogwood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–96 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought did not decrease PSII quantum yield in ear bracts.
ear bracts e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Φ PSII of ear bracts did not decrease at all in response to drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–978 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive nitrogen could decrease economic coefficient.
Excessive nitrogen e0 economic coefficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive nitrogen,however,could decrease economic coefficient,and thus decreasing pod yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–614 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Under GISS A2 2080, a projected 39.9% sorghum yield decrease became a 17.6% increase with later maturing cultivars.
developing later maturing new cultivars e1 39.9% decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a 39.9% decrease in sorghum yield was converted to a 17.6% increase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–1939 e1 “developing later maturing new cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1577 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet grain yield did not decrease when nitrogen was curtailed by 25%.
amount of N was curtailed by 25% (M75I100) e0 grain yield of PM e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The grain yield of PM did not decrease even when the amount of N was curtailed by 25% (M75I100). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–848 e1 “pearlmillet (PM) (Pennisetum glaucum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low resistance to fungal leaf pathogens was identified as the main cause of yield decrease across cultivars.
fungal pathogens e0 pathogen low level of resistance e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease for all cultivars was mainly affected by low level of resistance on fungal pathogens responsible for leaf diseases. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–905 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated cotton had a 82% decrease in yield /plant.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield /plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 t0 “Upland Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Biochicol 020PC was associated with a decrease of maize yield .
Biochicol 020PC e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–800 e2 “maize plant mass above the ground and roots was evaluated at phase of 4-5 leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–175 e3 “Biochicol 020PC did not cause significant changes in maize plants development and heath condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–631 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mays
Cornus sericea
Triticum aestivum
Arachis hypogaea
Sorghum
Cenchrus americanus
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays