View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Predicted fresh pea yield loss was 16 kg/ha per heat degree day above 27C.
Value16 kg/ha per heat degree day e0 Verbatim
e0 “Predicted decrease in fresh pea yield ranged from 16 kg/ha per heat degree day above 27C to 67 kg/ha per heat degree day above 35C. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–502 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Predicted fresh pea yield loss was 67 kg/ha per heat degree day above 35C.
Value67 kg/ha per heat degree day e0 Verbatim
e0 “Predicted decrease in fresh pea yield ranged from 16 kg/ha per heat degree day above 27C to 67 kg/ha per heat degree day above 35C. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–502 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The projected yield decrease is attributed mainly to increasing soil moisture stress from a warmer climate.
Treatmentwarmer climate e0 Outcomedecreases in sugar cane yields e0 Qualifierincreasing soil moisture stress e0 Verbatim
t0 “Potential impacts of greenhouse gas climate change scenarios on sugar cane yield s in Trinidad ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 e0 “The results showed that in all scenarios significant decrease s in sugar cane yield s are projected, these being due mainly to increasing soil moisture stress caused by the warmer climate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–636 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in PS II activity caused by Cd2+ was much greater than that in PS I activity.
Outcomedecrease in PS II activity e1 ComparatorPS I activity e1 Verbatim
e0 “treatment of wheat plants with Cd2+ ions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–54 e1 “The extent of the decrease in PS II activity was much greater than that in the PS I activity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–509 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Striga infection did not decrease host water use efficiency at 67 or 79 days.
TreatmentS. hermonthica infectione0 Outcomewater use efficiency e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “S. hermonthica infection did not decrease host photo-synthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency 67 or 79 DAS. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–484 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench host ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–149 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under extreme conditions in one year, barley-oat mixture yield decrease d by 11%.
Treatmentextreme conditions in one year e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Influence of Barley Scald Disease on Yield and Competition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 e4 “Over three years the yield increase of the mixtures compared with the means of pure components was close to 5%, whereas extreme conditions in one year led to a decrease of 11% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–684 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jewel, removal of all tertiary plus higher order buds significantly decrease d yield relative to control plots.
Treatmentremoval of all tertiary plus higher order buds e4 Directiondid result in a significant decrease e4 Comparatorcontrol plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724 e4 “although the removal of all tertiary plus higher order buds did result in a significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–822 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In population EA, reciprocal recurrent selection decrease d grain yield by 3.2% per year relative to CO.
Verbatim
e0 “corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–48 e1 “In EA, RRS reduced grain moisture 2.7% per year relative to CO; this was offset by a decrease in grain yield of 3.2% per year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1062 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect In population EA, reciprocal recurrent selection reduced grain moisture by 2.7% per year relative to CO. Observation In population EB, PI increased by 2.0 per year. Observation In population EB, grain yield increased by 2.7% per year. Observation In the cross EA × EB, only grain moisture was improved. Intervention effect At the H level in population HA, ME selection increased PI by 2.8% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the H level in population HB, ME selection increased PI by 4.6% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the H level in population HA, ME selection increased grain yield by 1.4% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the H level in population HB, ME selection increased grain yield by 6.9% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the H level in population HA, ME selection changed grain moisture by −0.9% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the H level in population HB, ME selection changed grain moisture by 1.8% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the I level in population IA, ME selection improved PI by 3.2% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the I level in population IA, ME selection reduced grain moisture by 2.2% per year relative to C0. Observation In population IB, only grain moisture was improved at the I level. Intervention effect At the L level in population LA, mass selection increased PI by 4.0% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the L level in population LB, mass selection increased PI by 2.1% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the L level in population LA, mass selection reduced grain moisture by 2.2% per year relative to C0. Intervention effect At the L level in population LB, mass selection reduced grain moisture by 1.0% per year relative to C0. Observation About 90% of the 408 introductions added to HOPE during the period were to the L level. Recommendation Selection in open-ended populations arranged in a hierarchical structure is a viable breeding strategy. Mechanism author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest increased QB-non-reducing centres downregulated PSII electron transport yield .
Outcomequantum yield of PSII electron transport e0 Qualifierproportion of QB-non-reducing PSII reaction centres e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in the quantum yield of PSII electron transport in senescent leaves was downregulated by an increase in the proportion of QB-non-reducing PSII reaction centres ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1568 t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed spring nitrogen did not reduce the sprays needed for maximum yield .
TreatmentDelaying nitrogen application in the spring e0 Outcomenumber of fungicide sprays required to achieve maximum yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delaying nitrogen application in the spring did not decrease the number of fungicide sprays required to achieve maximum yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1127 t0 “winter barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.