Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.

Taxon
Rosee0
Treatment
RZWe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decreasee1

Verbatim

e0

“Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41
e1

“There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599

Title

The effects of root-zone warming on the yield and quality of roses grown in a hydroponic system

G. I. Moss Journal of Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.1080/00221589.1984.11515231

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry.

Treatment
delay in topping until four additional leaves were producede0
Outcome
yield, grade index, or leaf chemistrye0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91
e0

“The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield, grade index, or leaf chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313

Title

Leaf Number at Topping and Yield, Grade Index, and Leaf Chemistry of a Mammoth‐Type Tobacco1

Mark J. King Agronomy Journal 1986. doi:10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800050033x

Other claims from this paper (2)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased latex yield did not significantly decrease tree growth over three years.

Taxon
Hevea brasiliensisHevea brasiliensist0
Treatment
increase of latex yielde0
Outcome
growth of treese0
Direction
did not result in a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
over a period of three yearse0

Verbatim

t0

“Hevea brasiliensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79
e0

“The increase of latex yield did not result in a significant decrease in the growth of trees over a period of three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–645

Title

Photosynthate allocation and productivity of latex vessels inHevea brasiliensis

J. -M. Eschbach; J. Tupý; R. Lacrotte Biologia Plantarum 1986. doi:10.1007/bf02902242

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid manure substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum dry matter yield per acre.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Liquid manuree0
Outcome
soy-sorghum DM yield per acree0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“Liquid manure may be substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum DM yield per acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405
e1

“Soybeans interseeded with grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39

Title

Potential of interseeded soybean and grain sorghum as a forage for dairy cattle

John E. Shirley; J. Koger Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 1985. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.3084

Other claims from this paper (2)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lee 74 soybean had a nonsignificant numerical yield decrease with higher BPMV infection.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
‘Lee 74’e0
Interactor
BPMVBean pod mottle viruse0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a numerical reduction in yield as BPMV infection levels increased with ‘Lee 74’ variety soybean, but the differences were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–496

Title

Effect of Bean Pod Mottle Virus on Soybean Yield

John D. Hopkins; A. J. Mueller Journal of Economic Entomology 1984. doi:10.1093/jee/77.4.943

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early termination of irrigation did not significantly decrease yield or lint quality of cotton on Sharkey clay.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum LGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
early termination of irrigatione1
Outcome
yield or lint qualitye1
Direction
not resulted in any significant decreasee1
Setting
Sharkey claye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80
e1

“The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928

Title

Improving Irrigation Scheduling and Water use Efficiency in Cotton

Derrick M. Oosterhuis Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 1989

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 10 to 15 primary branches did not significantly decrease sorghum grain number or yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
removal of 10 to 15 primary branchese1
Outcome
grain number or yielde1
Direction
declinee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76
e1

“removal of 10 to 15 primary branches gave an increase in grain size without a significant decline in grain number or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–305

Title

Effect of removal of primary branches on the grain size and yield of sorghum

A. R. Dabholkar; R. C. Mishra; Raziullah Khan . 1984

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated yield decrease of cotton from ambient ozone in water-stressed plots was 7%, not statistically significant.

Treatment
ambient O 3e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
7%e4
Qualifier
WS plote4
Comparator
charcoal‐filtered air plotse3

Verbatim

t0

“Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87
e2

“ambient O 3 (seasonal 12 h d −1 mean of 0.044 µ L L −1 ) caused a yield decrease of 19% in the WW plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–927
e3

“compared to the O 3 level in our charcoal‐filtered air plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–988
e4

“The comparable estimate for data from the WS plot was 7%, but this regression was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1146

Title

Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit

Allen S. Heagle; J. E. Miller; W. W. Heck; et al. Journal of Environmental Quality 1988. doi:10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700040019x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most V5 damage treatments did not significantly reduce yield.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
treatments at V5e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92
e0

“Most of the treatments at V5 did not significantly decrease yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–965

Title

Yield Reduction from Defoliation and Plant Cutoff of Determinate and Semideterminate Soybean1

C. S. Pickle; C. E. Caviness Agronomy Journal 1984. doi:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030026x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed weight did not decrease significantly.

Taxon
Field beant0
Treatment
Decreasing seed qualitye1
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant decrease in seed weight was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1128
t0

“Red Field Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80
e1

“Decreasing seed quality generally culminated in less top and root growth and less seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–998

Title

Seed Quality Influence on Plant Growth and Dinitrogen Fixation of Red Field Bean

A. Rodriguez; M. B. McDonald Crop Science 1989. doi:10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183x002900050044x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.