View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.
Verbatim
e0 “Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41 e1 “There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed topping did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry.
Treatmentdelay in topping until four additional leaves were produced e0 Outcomeyield, grade index, or leaf chemistry e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 e0 “The delay in topping until four additional leaves were produced did not significantly decrease yield , grade index, or leaf chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1313 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The increased latex yield did not significantly decrease tree growth over three years.
Treatmentincrease of latex yield e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Qualifierover a period of three years e0 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 e0 “The increase of latex yield did not result in a significant decrease in the growth of trees over a period of three years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–645 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Liquid manure substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum dry matter yield per acre.
Outcomesoy-sorghum DM yield per acre e0 Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Comparatorcommercial fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “Liquid manure may be substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum DM yield per acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 e1 “Soybeans interseeded with grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lee 74 soybean had a nonsignificant numerical yield decrease with higher BPMV infection.
Verbatim
e0 “There was a numerical reduction in yield as BPMV infection levels increased with ‘Lee 74’ variety soybean, but the differences were not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–496 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early termination of irrigation did not significantly decrease yield or lint quality of cotton on Sharkey clay.
Treatmentearly termination of irrigation e1 Outcomeyield or lint quality e1 Directionnot resulted in any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removing 10 to 15 primary branches did not significantly decrease sorghum grain number or yield .
Treatmentremoval of 10 to 15 primary branches e1 Outcomegrain number or yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 e1 “removal of 10 to 15 primary branches gave an increase in grain size without a significant decline in grain number or yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–305 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The estimated yield decrease of cotton from ambient ozone in water-stressed plots was 7%, not statistically significant.
Comparatorcharcoal‐filtered air plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e2 “ambient O 3 (seasonal 12 h d −1 mean of 0.044 µ L L −1 ) caused a yield decrease of 19% in the WW plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–927 e3 “compared to the O 3 level in our charcoal‐filtered air plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–988 e4 “The comparable estimate for data from the WS plot was 7%, but this regression was not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1146 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most V5 damage treatments did not significantly reduce yield .
Treatmenttreatments at V5 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 e0 “Most of the treatments at V5 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed weight did not decrease significantly.
TreatmentDecreasing seed quality e1 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in seed weight was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1128 t0 “Red Field Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 e1 “Decreasing seed quality generally culminated in less top and root growth and less seed yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–998 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.