Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A typical ozone dose decreased soybean seed weight by 20% relative to the control dose.

Treatment
a dose of O 3 typical for soybean production arease0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
a control dose of 0.025 ppm O 3e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a dose of O 3 typical for soybean production areas (seasonal 7—h day −1 mean of 0.055 ppm v/v) caused a seed weight decrease of 20% compared to a control dose of 0.025 ppm O 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–676

Title

Effects of Chronic Doses of Ozone and Sulfur Dioxide on Injury and Yield of Soybeans in Open‐Top Field Chambers1

Allen S. Heagle; Walter W. Heck; John O. Rawlings; et al. Crop Science 1983. doi:10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183x002300060037x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing main-stem leaves as they appeared decreased cotton plant growth and yield compared with no leaf removal

Treatment
Removal of main‐stem leaves as they appearede2
Outcome
plant growth and yielde2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Comparator
a control with no leaf removale1
Setting
two field trials in differing localitiese1

Verbatim

e0

“management of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–191
e1

“A range of leaf removal treatments was compared to a control with no leaf removal in two field trials in differing localities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–438
e2

“Removal of main‐stem leaves as they appeared had a dramatic effect on plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–532

Title

Cotton Main‐Stem Leaves in Relation to Vegetative Development and Yield

D. M. Oosterhuis; M. J. Urwiler Agronomy Journal 1988. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000010014x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing main-stem leaves after they had expanded had a less severe effect on cotton yield than early removal

Treatment
removed after they had expandede3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Qualifier
less severe influencee3
Comparator
a control with no leaf removale1

Verbatim

e0

“management of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–191
e1

“A range of leaf removal treatments was compared to a control with no leaf removal in two field trials in differing localities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–438
e3

“When main‐stem leaves were removed after they had expanded there was a less severe influence on yield but still a large influence on height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–673

Title

Cotton Main‐Stem Leaves in Relation to Vegetative Development and Yield

D. M. Oosterhuis; M. J. Urwiler Agronomy Journal 1988. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000010014x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early removal of 120 squares/m2 combined with late removal of 30 large bolls/m2 gave 94% of control yield (not significant).

Taxon
upland cottone1
Treatment
Removal of 120 squares/m 2 in combination with the late removal of 30 large bolls/m 2e4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
94%e4
Qualifier
when squares were removed earlye4
Comparator
controle4

Verbatim

e1

“upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–76
e4

“Removal of 120 squares/m 2 in combination with the late removal of 30 large bolls/m 2 yielded 94% (NS) of the control yield when squares were removed early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1105

Title

Cotton Response to Bud and Boll Removal1

E. D. Ungar; D. Wallach; E. Kletter Agronomy Journal 1987. doi:10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900030017x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1800 ppm foliar rate can cause soft lettuce seedlings.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
1800 ppm foliar ratee5
Outcome
soft seedlingse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–48
e5

“The 1800 ppm foliar rate is undesirable since it can decrease head size and percent salable heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–653
e6

“cause soft seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–679

Title

Lettuce Seedling and Yield Response to Preplant and Foliar Fertilization during Transplant Production1

B. A. Kratky; H. Y. Mishima Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1981. doi:10.21273/jashs.106.1.3

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantum yield of photosynthesis at rate-limiting quantum flux was not affected.

Taxon
Pinus silvestrise0
Outcome
quantum yield of photosynthesise7
Qualifier
at rate limiting quantum fluxe7

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigations of 4–7 week old seelings of Pinus silvestris , with ca 400 μg SO 2 m ‐3 for 4–5 days resulted in a decrease both in net photosynthetic rate and in the levels of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity of the primary needles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238
e7

“the quantum yield of photosynthesis at rate limiting quantum flux was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–908

Title

Effects of SO2on photosynthesis and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase in pine tree seedlings

Jan‐Erik Hällgren; Kerstin Gezelius Physiologia Plantarum 1982. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb06319.x

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late square removal combined with late removal of 30 large bolls/m2 gave 79% of control upland cotton yield.

Taxon
upland cottone1
Treatment
Removal of 120 squares/m 2 in combination with the late removal of 30 large bolls/m 2e4
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
79%e5
Qualifier
when squares were removed latee5
Comparator
controle5

Verbatim

e1

“upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–76
e4

“Removal of 120 squares/m 2 in combination with the late removal of 30 large bolls/m 2 yielded 94% (NS) of the control yield when squares were removed early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1105
e5

“79% of the control yield when squares were removed late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1165

Title

Cotton Response to Bud and Boll Removal1

E. D. Ungar; D. Wallach; E. Kletter Agronomy Journal 1987. doi:10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900030017x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When lodging developed steadily, effects of mixtures on grain yield were comparable to those of growth regulators.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
mixturese6
Outcome
grain yieldse6
Direction
comparablee6
Qualifier
When lodging developed steadilye6
Comparator
growth regulatorse6
Setting
field experimentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The potential of selected cultivar mixtures to decrease lodging and consequently improve yields in winter barley was examined in field experiments at two locations over 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–184
e6

“When lodging developed steadily, effects of mixtures on grain yields were comparable to those of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1020

Title

Effects of winter barley cultivar mixtures on lodging

H. Stützel; W. Aufhammer The Journal of Agricultural Science 1989. doi:10.1017/s0021859600084094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 1979 season, yield losses of 25% occurred for the three chile cultivars for each 10-fold increase in the initial M. incognita population.

Taxon
chilee3
Treatment
each 10-fold increase in the initial population of M. incognitae1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
1979 seasone0
Setting
sandy loam soile2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield losses of 31% for the 1978 season and 25% for the 1979 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–591
e1

“for each 10-fold increase in the initial population of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–683
e2

“microplot data from a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–516
e3

“chile (Capsicum annuum) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–117

Title

Influence of Initial Population Densities of Meloidogyne incognita on Three Chile Cultivars.

D L Lindsey; M S Clayshulte PubMed 1982

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming tended to raise K and NO3-N leaching losses.

Taxon
begoniaBegoniat0
Treatment
Limingt1
Outcome
K and NO 3 ‐Ne0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increase those of K and NO 3 ‐N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–854
t0

“begonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85
t1

“Liming tended to decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–776

Title

Leaching losses of nutrients and yield and nutrient uptake by container‐grown begonia as affected by lime and fertiliser applications to a peat medium

Richar D. J. Haynes Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1982. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740330503

Other claims from this paper (18)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.