View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher temperatures shortened grain-filling duration, accounting for nearly all of the grain- yield decrease .
Outcomedecreases in grain yield e0 Qualifiershorter duration of grain filling e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease s in grain yield were almost entirely determined by a shorter duration of grain filling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–894 t0 “WHOLE PLANT AND GRAIN YIELD IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–96 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in leaf photosynthetic rate.
Outcomeleaf photosynthetic rate e0 Directionno apparent decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no apparent decrease in fruit yield or leaf photosynthetic rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–573 e1 “The paclobutrazol treatment resulted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–431 t0 “Nectarine Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transfer from low to high PPFD did not decrease orange quantum yield .
TreatmentTransferring seedlings from low to high PPFD e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Transferring seedlings from low to high PPFD decrease d ø of grapefruit but not of orange leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–868 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease proso millet yield variance.
Treatmentadding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row e5 Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Variability in proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) yield s due to number of rows planted and harvested in field experimentation was compared using four cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–434 e5 “adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1201 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Variable fluorescence yield decrease d, reflecting lower photosystem II quantum yield .
Outcomevariable fluorescence yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in variable fluorescence yield reflects a lowering of photosystem II quantum yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1121 e1 “intact spinach leaves with SO 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–82 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The estimated yield decrease of cotton from ambient ozone in water-stressed plots was 7%, not statistically significant.
Comparatorcharcoal‐filtered air plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e2 “ambient O 3 (seasonal 12 h d −1 mean of 0.044 µ L L −1 ) caused a yield decrease of 19% in the WW plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–927 e3 “compared to the O 3 level in our charcoal‐filtered air plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–988 e4 “The comparable estimate for data from the WS plot was 7%, but this regression was not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1146 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most V5 damage treatments did not significantly reduce yield .
Treatmenttreatments at V5 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 e0 “Most of the treatments at V5 did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem populations tended to decrease as crop age increased.
OutcomeStem populations e0 Qualifierage of the crop e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stem populations tended to decrease with the age of the crop. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–601 t0 “chicory ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
An increase in one yield component did not lead to a compensating decrease in any other component.
Outcomekompenserende afname in enige van die ander komponente e7 Verbatim
t0 “Opbrengskomponente van koring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 e7 “'n Toename in een komponent het nie tot 'n kompenserende afname in enige van die ander komponente gelei nie ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–807 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With increasing insecticide dose, chilli germination and survival showed decrease .
Treatmenteach insecticide e0 Outcomegermination and survival e0 Verbatim
e0 “Within each insecticide the decrease in germination and survival and increase in percent of anbormal meiotic cells and percent of pollen sterility followed an increasing trend. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–845 t0 “chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 162–189 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.