Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing molybdenum application significantly decreased gram grain yield.

Taxon
gramt0
Treatment
increasing application of Molybdenume0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in grain yield was noted with increasing application of Molybdenum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–652
t0

“Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66

Title

Studies on the Effect of Micronutrient Anions on the Yield of Gram

SINGH B; SRIVASTAVA S.K Madras Agricultural Journal 1978. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a03058

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The observed decrease in yield from negative selection was generally greater than predicted.

Treatment
negative selectione5
Outcome
the observed decreasee6
Direction
generally greatere6
Value
‒1.93 to ‒17.25%e6
Qualifier
0.00 to ‒17.65%e6
Comparator
that predictede6

Verbatim

t0

“Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74
e5

“The observed decrease (‒0.75 to ‒7.05%) in the same trait for negative selection was generally greater than that predicted (‒2.18 to ‒4.62%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1075
e6

“The relationship between observed increase in yield from selection (3.22 to 12.53%) and that predicted (0.00 to 19.25%) was variable, but the observed decrease (‒1.93 to ‒17.25%) was generally greater than that predicted 0.00 to ‒17.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1314

Title

Observed and Predicted Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas1

Shivaji Pandey; E. T. Gritton Crop Science 1976. doi:10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183x001600020034x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the yield decrease may have been because patches of sward failed to regrow where more fertilizer was applied.

Taxon
Grass Swardst0
Treatment
more fertilizere1
Outcome
patches of sward failed to regrowe1

Verbatim

t0

“Grass Swards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73
e1

“perhaps because patches of sward failed to regrow where the crop received more fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1124

Title

Effect of Fungicides and Fertilizer on Yield and Diseases of Grass Swards

E. W. BROOM; A. J. HEARD; ELLIS GRIFFITHS; et al. Plant Pathology 1975. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1975.tb01881.x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate rainfall before the dough stage delayed the decrease in green forage yield.

Treatment
adequate rainfall was received before the dough stagee5
Outcome
Green forage yieldse5
Direction
delayede5
Qualifier
this decrease was delayede5

Verbatim

e0

“whole plants of corn ( Zea mays , L.) harvested as silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–175
e5

“The changes noted in ear and stalk quality were reflected in whole plant quality. Green forage yields generally decreased with maturity, but when adequate rainfall was received before the dough stage this decrease was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1244

Title

Quality and Yield of Corn Plants and Component Parts when Harvested for Silage at Different Maturity Stages1

D. G. Cummins Agronomy Journal 1970. doi:10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060030x

Other claims from this paper (14)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss mainly resulted from smaller bulbs.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Outcome
Loss of yielde0
Qualifier
decrease in bulb sizee0

Verbatim

e0

“Loss of yield was mainly the result of decrease in bulb size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813
t0

“Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73

Title

The Effect of Weed Removal at Different Times on the Yield of Bulb Onions

R.T. Hewson; H.A. Roberts Journal of Horticultural Science 1971. doi:10.1080/00221589.1971.11514426

Other claims from this paper (10)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diquat caused the greatest seed-yield decrease, mainly through mean seed weight.

Taxon
beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
diquate0
Outcome
largest decreasese0
Qualifier
effects on mean seed weighte0

Verbatim

e0

“The largest decreases were caused by diquat and were attributable mainly to effects on mean seed weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1818
t0

“beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–59

Title

Chemical aids to drying seeds of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) before harvest

C. C. HOLE; R. C. HARDWICK Annals of Applied Biology 1978. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1978.tb00734.x

Other claims from this paper (16)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In every experiment, nitrogen above 75 kg N/ha did not significantly increase or decrease sugar yield.

Treatment
more than 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
neither increased nor decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in every experiment, giving more than 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decreased the sugar yield significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–929
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110

Title

The effect of time of sowing and harvesting on growth, yield and nitrogen fertilizer requirement of sugar beet

A. P. Draycott; D. J. Webb; E. M. Wright The Journal of Agricultural Science 1973. doi:10.1017/s0021859600058925

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine applied at flowering decreased grain yield.

Treatment
Simazinet0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it is accompanied by a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–168
t0

“Simazine on Protein Content of Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–51

Title

Effect of Simazine on Protein Content of Rice Grain (Oryza sativa L.)

B. S. Vergara; M. Miller; E. Avelino Agronomy Journal 1970. doi:10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200020028x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during ear development decreased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Shading during the period of ear developmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shading during the period of ear development caused an appreciable decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–319
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55

Title

Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat

R. W. Willey; R. Holliday The Journal of Agricultural Science 1971. doi:10.1017/s0021859600064522

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced.

Treatment
Sprays of DDTe0
Outcome
number of cowpea flowers producede0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–353

Title

Relationships of Insect Control Attempts by Chemicals to Components of Yield of Cowpeas in Uganda

C. S. Koehler; P. N. Mehta Journal of Economic Entomology 1972. doi:10.1093/jee/65.5.1421

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.