View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing molybdenum application significantly decrease d gram grain yield .
Treatmentincreasing application of Molybdenum e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in grain yield was noted with increasing application of Molybdenum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–652 t0 “Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The observed decrease in yield from negative selection was generally greater than predicted.
Treatmentnegative selection e5 Outcomethe observed decrease e6 Directiongenerally greater e6 Qualifier0.00 to ‒17.65% e6 Comparatorthat predicted e6 Verbatim
t0 “Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74 e5 “The observed decrease (‒0.75 to ‒7.05%) in the same trait for negative selection was generally greater than that predicted (‒2.18 to ‒4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1075 e6 “The relationship between observed increase in yield from selection (3.22 to 12.53%) and that predicted (0.00 to 19.25%) was variable, but the observed decrease (‒1.93 to ‒17.25%) was generally greater than that predicted 0.00 to ‒17.65%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1314 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism hypothesis original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest the yield decrease may have been because patches of sward failed to regrow where more fertilizer was applied.
Treatmentmore fertilizer e1 Outcomepatches of sward failed to regrow e1 Verbatim
t0 “Grass Swards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 e1 “perhaps because patches of sward failed to regrow where the crop received more fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1124 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Adequate rainfall before the dough stage delayed the decrease in green forage yield .
Treatmentadequate rainfall was received before the dough stage e5 OutcomeGreen forage yields e5 Qualifierthis decrease was delayed e5 Verbatim
e0 “whole plants of corn ( Zea mays , L.) harvested as silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–175 e5 “The changes noted in ear and stalk quality were reflected in whole plant quality. Green forage yield s generally decrease d with maturity, but when adequate rainfall was received before the dough stage this decrease was delayed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1244 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield loss mainly resulted from smaller bulbs.
Qualifierdecrease in bulb size e0 Verbatim
e0 “Loss of yield was mainly the result of decrease in bulb size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813 t0 “Bulb Onions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Diquat caused the greatest seed- yield decrease , mainly through mean seed weight.
Outcomelargest decreases e0 Qualifiereffects on mean seed weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The largest decrease s were caused by diquat and were attributable mainly to effects on mean seed weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1818 t0 “beans (Phaseolus vulgaris ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–59 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In every experiment, nitrogen above 75 kg N/ha did not significantly increase or decrease sugar yield .
Treatmentmore than 75 kg N/ha e0 Directionneither increased nor decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in every experiment, giving more than 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decrease d the sugar yield significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–929 t0 “sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–110 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Simazine applied at flowering decrease d grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “it is accompanied by a decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–168 t0 “Simazine on Protein Content of Rice Grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading during ear development decrease d wheat grain yield .
TreatmentShading during the period of ear development e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Shading during the period of ear development caused an appreciable decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–319 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced.
Outcomenumber of cowpea flowers produced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–353 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.