Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polyphenol decrease did not affect organoleptic oil quality or shelf-life.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeat0
Compound: polyphenolse0
Outcome: oil quality in terms of organoleptic parameters or oil shelf-lifee0
Direction: did not influencee0
Qualifier: decrease of polyphenolse0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease of polyphenols did not influence the oil quality in terms of organoleptic parameters or oil shelf-life”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1807

t0
“olive (Olea europaeaL.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96

Title

Yield and oil quality of intensively trained trees of three cultivars of olive (Olea europaeaL.) under different irrigation regimes

M. Patumi; R. D’Andria; G. Fontanazza; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1999. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511180

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation T3 soil water stayed near field capacity and did not differ from T2.
Observation Soil moisture decreased during summer under T0 and T1, reaching 20.8% in T0 on 12 August before rainfall restored field capacity.
Intervention effect Irrigated olive leaves had higher relative water content than rain-fed controls.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased yield in all olive cultivars compared with rain-fed controls.
Intervention effect T1 increased Nocellara del Belice olive yield by 200% versus rain-fed control.
Intervention effect T2 increased Ascolana tenera olive yield by 233% versus control.
Intervention effect T2 increased Kalamata olive yield by 47% versus control.
Intervention effect Irrigated olives had higher oil yield, mainly because fruit yield increased.
Observation Pulp-stone ratio and fruit triglyceride quantity were similar across irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Irrigation did not affect olive oil fatty acid composition.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased olive oil polyphenolic substance content.
Mechanism The authors attribute the polyphenol decrease to water-deficit-related enzymatic activity rather than fruit ripening.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

'Feteasca regala' yield potential decreased at rate 4.5.

Taxon: wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Material: 'Feteasca regala'e0
Outcome: yield potentiale0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4.5e0

Verbatim

e0
“The rate of decrease in yield potential was 4.5 from 'Feteasca regala', 20.5 from 'Riesling italian', 24 from 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 19 from 'Merlot'”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–564

t0
“wine grape”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

Title

The quantitatively and qualitatively potential of the wine grape harvest in relation with the wine climate milessima

Liliana Alexandrina PIRCALABU; Aurelia TUDORACHE; Adrian SERDINESCU; et al. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2015. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:10744

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation 'Riesling italian' yield potential decreased at rate 20.5.
Observation 'Cabernet Sauvignon' yield potential decreased at rate 24.
Observation 'Merlot' yield potential decreased at rate 19.
Observation 'Feteasca regala' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 4.5.
Observation 'Riesling italian' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 2.0.
Observation 'Cabernet Sauvignon' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 14.5.
Observation 'Merlot' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 5.0.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Feteasca regala' was T=-0.220Ind -0.1317.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Riesling italian' was T=-0.168Ind -0.0172.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Merlot' was T=-0.173Ind -0.2758.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Cabernet Sauvignon' was T=-0.166Ind -0.6745.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

'Riesling italian' yield potential decreased at rate 20.5.

Taxon: wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Material: 'Riesling italian'e0
Outcome: yield potentiale0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 20.5e0

Verbatim

e0
“The rate of decrease in yield potential was 4.5 from 'Feteasca regala', 20.5 from 'Riesling italian', 24 from 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 19 from 'Merlot'”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–564

t0
“wine grape”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

Title

The quantitatively and qualitatively potential of the wine grape harvest in relation with the wine climate milessima

Liliana Alexandrina PIRCALABU; Aurelia TUDORACHE; Adrian SERDINESCU; et al. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2015. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:10744

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation 'Feteasca regala' yield potential decreased at rate 4.5.
Observation 'Cabernet Sauvignon' yield potential decreased at rate 24.
Observation 'Merlot' yield potential decreased at rate 19.
Observation 'Feteasca regala' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 4.5.
Observation 'Riesling italian' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 2.0.
Observation 'Cabernet Sauvignon' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 14.5.
Observation 'Merlot' glucoacidimetric index increased at rate 5.0.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Feteasca regala' was T=-0.220Ind -0.1317.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Riesling italian' was T=-0.168Ind -0.0172.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Merlot' was T=-0.173Ind -0.2758.
Method / resource Harvest forecast equation for 'Cabernet Sauvignon' was T=-0.166Ind -0.6745.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing soil subtype could raise or lower apple yield.

Taxon: apple treeMalus domesticae0
Outcome: apple yielde0
Direction: increase or decreasee0
Setting: soil subtypee0

Verbatim

e0
“Changing the soil subtype during the growing of an apple tree under these conditions can lead to an increase or decrease in apple yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–265

Title

Value of soil subtype and force for rootstock growth for economic efficiency of apple tree fruit production in the Tambov region

Vyacheslav Zakharov; Tatyana Zubkova; Sergey Shubkin; et al. АгроЭкоИнфо 2022. doi:10.51419/202125527.

Other claims from this paper (6)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced daily food production in leaves resulted in decreased orange yield.

Taxon: orange treest0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasede0
Qualifier: decrease in the amount of food made daily in the leavese0

Verbatim

e0
“This decrease in the amount of food made daily in the leaves has resulted in a decreased yield, as well as in a decreased growth of the trees.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–577

t0
“orange trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37

Title

Effect of cement dust on orange trees

George J. Peirce OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1910

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With MCWHS, about 50% less applied water reduced fig yield about 14%.

Taxon: figsFicust0
Treatment: decreasing about 50 % of applied watere0
Outcome: fig yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 14 %e0
Qualifier: By using MCWHSe0
Comparator: maximum yield conditione0

Verbatim

e0
“By using MCWHS, decreasing about 50 % of applied water causes about 14 % decrease in fig yield and net income increased twice compared with maximum yield condition”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–637

t0
“figs”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83

Title

Economic analysis of the optimal level of supplemental irrigation for rain-fed figs

M. Khozaie; Ali Reza Sepaskhah Iran agricultural research 2018. doi:10.22099/iar.2018.4928

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Without MCWHS, roughly 55% less water lowered fig yield about 28%.
Intervention effect Without MCWHS, roughly 55% less water doubled net income relative to maximum yield.
Intervention effect Using MCWHS lowered the optimal supplemental irrigation water amount.
Intervention effect With MCWHS, about 50% less applied water doubled net income.
Association Higher unit water prices reduced the optimal supplemental irrigation water amount for high profit.
Method / resource An equation was proposed for annual precipitation prediction to plan fig irrigation.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tannin content tends to increase as yield decreases within a certain level.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Material: 'Cabernet Gernischet'e0
Treatment: decrease of yielde2
Outcome: tannine1
Direction: increase trende1
Setting: Yantaie0

Verbatim

e0
“'Cabernet Gernischet'(Vitis vinifera L.) that were most widely-planted wine grape cultivars in Yantai was conducted as materials,to evaluate the effect of shoots thinning and yields on the quality of grape.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–206

e1
“The content of tannin showed an increase trend with the decrease of yield within a certain level.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–504

e2
“The content of total phenols and anthocyanins had a positive correlation with the decrease of yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–407

Title

Effect of Fruit Yields on Quality of ‘Cabernet Gernischet’ Grape

Zhang Zhen-wen Northern Horticulture 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Association Cabernet Gernischet matures earlier as yield decreases.
Association Total phenols content is positively correlated with decreasing yield.
Association Anthocyanin content is positively correlated with decreasing yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shelters did not significantly decrease leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance or transpiration.

Taxon: rabbiteye blueberrye0
Organ / stage: leavese0
Treatment: rain shelter conditionse0
Outcome: net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rain shelter conditions did not significantly decrease the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (E) of the rabbiteye blueberry leaves.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1034

Title

Effect of Rain-Shelter Cultivation on Yield and Fruit Quality of Container-Grown Rabbiteye Blueberry in Central-Eastern China

Jiguang Wei; Jiafeng Jiang; Liangliang Tian; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14081167

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Rain shelters did not significantly change air temperature or relative humidity.
Intervention effect Rain shelters significantly reduced photosynthetically active and UV radiation at the canopy.
Intervention effect Shelters did not significantly affect fruit yield or berry weight.
Intervention effect Shelters produced no significant differences in soluble solids, acidity and flavonoids.
Intervention effect Shelters significantly decreased total polyphenols in low rainfall years.
Intervention effect Shelters significantly decreased anthocyanins in low rainfall years.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preparations decreased scald-affected fruit 2.5-fold.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticat0
Treatment: adaptogenic preparationse0
Outcome: fruits affected by scalde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 2.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The adaptogenic preparations increased the yield of marketable apple fruits by 14.8% and contributed to a 2.5-fold decrease in fruits affected by scald and a 2-fold decrease in bitter pitting.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–958

t0
“apple”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–91

Title

Adaptogenic Preparations Enhance the Tolerance to Spring Frosts, Yield and Quality of Apple Fruits

Zoya Ozherelieva; Pavel Prudnikov; Andrey Nikitin; et al. Horticulturae 2023. doi:10.3390/horticulturae9050591

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect The preparation combination increased apple yield 1.7 times.
Intervention effect The preparation combination increased average fruit weight by 20.3 g.
Intervention effect Preparations increased marketable apple fruit yield by 14.8%.
Intervention effect Preparations decreased bitter pitting 2-fold.
Intervention effect Preparations increased fruit sucrose by 25.6% relative to control.
Intervention effect Preparations increased fruit ascorbic acid by 20.5% relative to control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the preparations as an additional apple cultivation technique.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild blueberry fruit yield decreased in late harvesting.

Taxon: wild blueberrye6
Treatment: late harvestinge2
Outcome: fruit yielde2
Direction: decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6
“Northeastern North America is the world’s leading producer of wild blueberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–86

e2
“fruit yield increased gradually during early harvesting, reached maximum during mid-season, and then started to decrease in late harvesting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1231

Title

Potential Use of Digital Photographic Technique to Examine Wild Blueberry Ripening in Relation to Time of Harvest

Salamat Ali; Qamar Uz Zaman; Aitazaz Ahsan Farooque; et al. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2018. doi:10.13031/aea.12490

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association Percentage of blue pixels correlated significantly with actual fruit yield in Field A.
Association Percentage of blue pixels correlated significantly with actual fruit yield in Field B.
Intervention effect The effect of harvest time on wild blueberry fruit yield was significant.
Intervention effect Wild blueberry fruit yield increased gradually during early harvesting.
Intervention effect Wild blueberry fruit yield reached its maximum during mid-season harvest.
Intervention effect About 90% of green wild blueberries had turned blue at the end of middle season, compared with 58% in early season.
Recommendation The optimum time to harvest wild blueberries is the middle season, to ensure high fruit yield and quality.
Method / resource Optical analysis could help keep wild blueberry fruit quality by optimizing harvest timing.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics