Search claims · PlantClaims

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend MW with MI and NF under the stated salinity conditions to lower salinity and improve growth, yield characteristics and income.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeae0
Material: Kalamatae0
Outcome: use MW and fertilization with MI (500 g/tree) +NF (2 kg/tree/year)e0
Qualifier: under 3430 ppm soil salinity of and 3904 ppm water salinitye0

Verbatim

e0
“It could be recommended to use MW and fertilization with MI (500 g/tree) +NF (2 kg/tree/year) under 3430 ppm soil salinity of and 3904 ppm water salinity to decrease salinity and enhance vegetative growth, yield characteristics and increase net income of Kalamata olive trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1633

Title

Effect of magnetic saline irrigation water and soil amendments on growth and productivity of Kalamata olive cultivar

Amr Mohamed; Abdelhamid Sherif Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2020. doi:10.21608/ejar.2020.120323

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect MW and MI+NF significantly enhanced olive shoot length, leaf density and leaf surface area.
Intervention effect MW and MI+NF enhanced the number of fruits per shoot.
Intervention effect MW and MI+NF enhanced total olive yield per tree.
Intervention effect MW and MI+NF enhanced olive fruit physical characteristics.
Intervention effect MW and MI+NF enhanced macro and micro nutrient content in olive leaves, fruits and soil in the first two seasons.
Intervention effect MW decreased proline content of olive leaves relative to non magnetic saline irrigation.
Intervention effect MW decreased proline content of olive fruits relative to non magnetic saline irrigation.
Intervention effect MW irrigation with MI and Nile fertile produced about 36362.5 LE fed-1 net income for olive growers, compared with other treatments.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS biomass ranked small above medium above marginal farmers, at 19.21, 18.85 and 18.28 t ha−1 yr−1 respectively.

Taxon: crops, grasses and treese1
Outcome: grand total biomasse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 19.21 t ha−1 yr−1e0
Qualifier: small (19.21 t ha−1 yr−1) > medium (18.85 t ha−1 yr−1) > marginal (18.28 t ha−1 yr−1)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The order of decrease in grand total biomass for different categories of farmers in AS was small (19.21 t ha−1 yr−1) > medium (18.85 t ha−1 yr−1) > marginal (18.28 t ha−1 yr−1)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–675

e1
“Total biomass (AG+BG) of crops, grasses and trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–421

Title

Yield assessment and economic returns from agroforestry systems in sub-temperate region of Himachal Pradesh, India

Pradeep Kumar; C.L. Thakur; Pradeepen Rai Indian journal of agroforestry 2018

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated effluent at 1 L/week increased basic density in aroeira.

Taxon: aroeirae0
Treatment: treated effluent at a volume of 1 L/weeke1
Outcome: basic densitye0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while in aroeira it increased the basic density and VM, with a decrease in the gravimetric yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1648

e1
“The treated effluent at a volume of 1 L/week”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1459

Title

Growth and Energy Characteristics of Arboreal Wood Irrigated with Treated Effluent in Degraded Soil of Semi-Arid Regions

Victor Junior Lima Felix; Salomão de Sousa Medeiros; Vanderléia Fernanda dos Santos Araújo; et al. Forests 2025. doi:10.3390/f16020354

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource The Richards model fitted growth variables satisfactorily for the species studied.
Intervention effect Treated effluent at 1 L/week increased condensed-liquid yield of sabiá.
Intervention effect Treated effluent at 1 L/week decreased volatile materials in sabiá wood.
Intervention effect Treated effluent at 1 L/week increased volatile materials in aroeira.
Intervention effect Treated effluent at 1 L/week decreased gravimetric yield in aroeira.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate fertilizers with simazine increased wort sugar.

Taxon: grapet0
Treatment: nitrate fertilizers with simazinee0
Outcome: sugar content of the worte0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There is an increase in the sugar content of the wort in the options for the joint use of nitrate fertilizers with simazine and atrazine, without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1025

t0
“Isabella grape variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510

Title

Impact of combination application of herbicides and mineral fertilizers on the chemical composition of must and wine

Madina B. Khokonova Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V M Kokov 2022. doi:10.55196/2411-3492-2022-3-37-26-30

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined herbicides and fertilizers generally left must sugar at control level.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with atrazine increased wort sugar.
Observation These combinations did not significantly decrease yield.
Observation Wort titratable acids did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NP slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NRK slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Observation Coloring substances and total phenols tended to increase in all variants.
Observation Simazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation Atrazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation These herbicides and fertilizers did not negatively affect wine organoleptic properties.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased crude fibre, ash and oil content of pistachio nuts.

Taxon: PistachioPistacia verae0
Treatment: irrigatione0
Outcome: crude fibre, ash and oil content of the nutse0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“irrigation caused an increase in Pistachio nut yield, crude fibre, ash and oil content of the nuts and decrease in protein content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–435

Title

Physical and chemical properties of some pistachio varieties (Pistacia vera L.) and oils grown under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions in Turkey

O. Kola; İ. Hayoğlu; H. Türkoğlu; et al. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 2018. doi:10.3920/qas2017.1152

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Irrigation increased pistachio nut yield.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased pistachio nut protein content.
Intervention effect Irrigation did not change pistachio kernel or nut size or dry matter content.
Association Pistachio variety markedly affected primary fatty acids.
Intervention effect Irrigation did not affect primary fatty acids.
Observation Total pistachio lipid levels ranged from 53.09 to 56.11%.
Observation Oleic acid was the most abundant fatty acid in pistachio oil, at 70.47 to 75.82% of fatty acids.
Observation Kırmızı pistachio oil had the highest linoleic acid content under irrigation, 17.72%.
Observation Pistachio nut saturated fatty acids were below 12.02%.
Observation Pistachio nut monounsaturated fatty acids reached 77.07%.
Observation Pistachio nut polyunsaturated fatty acids reached 17.99%.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend July spraying with GA 3 at 75 mg L −1.

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome: Spraying with GA 3 at 75 mg L −1 in Julye0

Verbatim

e0
“Spraying with GA 3 at 75 mg L −1 in July could have a significant impact on a grower's income by reducing damage from physiological disorders, improving yield with a minimum decrease in red skin coloration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1677

t0
“pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137

Title

Comparative effects of gibberellin A₃, glycine betaine, and Si, Ca, and K fertilizers on physiological disorders and yield of pomegranate cv. Wonderful

Pavlina Drogoudi; Georgios E Pantelidis Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1002/jsfa.11354

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect July GA 3 at 75 or 150 mg L −1 reduced cracking, russeting and sunscald.
Intervention effect July GA 3 increased fruit size, yield and 100-aril weight.
Intervention effect July GA 3 did not affect edible portion or juice percentage.
Intervention effect July GA 3 reduced skin red coloration, especially at the higher dose.
Intervention effect September GA 3 at 75 mg L −1 yielded few harvested fruit because maturation was delayed.
Intervention effect Repeated glycine betaine sprays reduced sunscald symptoms in the high-damage year.
Intervention effect Repeated glycine betaine sprays reduced red coloration in the high-damage year.
Intervention effect Repeated glycine betaine sprays reduced maturity index in the high-damage year.
Intervention effect Calcium chloride sprays did not affect physiological disorders.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer containing potassium did not affect physiological disorders.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer containing potassium and calcium increased cracking in the high-damage year.
Intervention effect Si fertilizer containing potassium and calcium decreased sunscald in the high-damage year.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: total yielde0
Direction: without compromisinge0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest FR film for primocane raspberry cultivation.

Taxon: raspberrye0
Outcome: FR-absorbing films may therefore be useful when growing primocane raspberry cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0
“FR-absorbing films may therefore be useful when growing primocane raspberry cultivars in order to increase their yield potential, the contents of bioactive compounds in their fruit, and to decrease vegetative growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1630

Title

Growth and cropping of primocane and biennial raspberry cultivars grown under a film absorbing far-red light

Pauliina Palonen; Saila Karhu; Hanna Savelainen; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2011. doi:10.1080/14620316.2011.11512735

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect FR film increased flower numbers in primocane cultivars.
Intervention effect FR film reduced flower numbers in biennial cultivars during later forcing.
Intervention effect Autumn Bliss flower count rose from 185 to 202 per plant.
Intervention effect Polka flower count rose from 171 to 203 per plant.
Intervention effect FR film increased berries per plant in Polka.
Intervention effect FR film reduced cane growth through fewer internodes in Polka.
Intervention effect FR film reduced cane growth through shorter internodes in Tulameen.
Intervention effect FR film had no effect on anthocyanins, sugars, most minerals or fruit colour.
Intervention effect FR film increased ellagic acid levels.
Intervention effect FR film slightly reduced soluble solids to titratable acidity ratio.
Recommendation Authors advise against FR film for primocanes of biennial raspberry cultivars.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 l/ha, titratable acids in berries increased relative to control.

Taxon: GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment: 6 l/ha optione0
Outcome: titratable acidse0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“With a significant increase in yield in the 6 l/ha option, a decrease in the content of soluble sugars in the berries and an increase in titratable acids were observed compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–747

t0
“GRAPEVINE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–87

Title

INFLUENCE OF COMPLEX MINERAL FERTILIZER WITH MICROELEMENTS ON PRODUCTIVITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANTS

N.O. Arestova; I.O. Ryabchun Russian vine 2023. doi:10.32904/2712-8245-2023-25-103-108

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Foliar fertilizer at 4.0 and 6.0 l/ha increased berries per bunch and berry weight.
Intervention effect The 4.0 and 6.0 l/ha treatments increased grape yield by 24.0...28.4 % over control.
Intervention effect At 6 l/ha, soluble sugars in berries decreased relative to control.
Recommendation The authors recommend a fertilizer dose of 4.0 l/ha.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50% of leaves had little effect on canopy size.

Taxon: oranget0
Treatment: removal of 50% of the leavese0
Outcome: total canopy sizee0
Direction: little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf size of new flush was reduced by removal of 50% of the leaves in both cultivars but there was little effect on total canopy size”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–787

t0
“Orange Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin yield, fruit number or fruit size.
Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin soluble solids yield or juice measures.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves decreased fruit yield and soluble solids yield.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves did not affect Brix or Brix-to-acid ratio.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of leaves reduced new-flush leaf size in both cultivars.
Intervention effect Removing 25% of canopy leaves had no measured effects.
Association Fruit weight increased with leaf area per fruit.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics