View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The cranberry yield decrease vanished the year after outlet redesign.
Treatmentredesigning the outlet e0 Qualifierthe following year e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cranberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 e0 “This yield decrease vanished the following year after redesigning the outlet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–360 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
TaxonMerlot and Cabernet franc t0 Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1712 t0 “Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease .
Treatmentcocoa/cassava combination e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 e1 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 t0 “Quantitative and qualitative impact of Tomato Black Ring Virus (TBRV) on Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield .
Treatmentincreasing the density e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
UV-B and ABA decrease yield .
TreatmentThese treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “These treatments also hasten berry sugar and phenol accumulation, but reduce berry growth and sugar per berry at harvest, and therefore decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1654 t0 “grape berry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grapevine decline was accompanied by a decrease in fruit yield quality.
Outcomefruit yield quality e2 Verbatim
e2 “Syndromes of declined grapevine plants included growth retardant of shoot system and root-rot as well as decrease of grapevine fruit yield quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–307 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit did not decrease maximum quantum yield of PSII.
Outcomemaximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD did not decrease the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1081 t0 “Styrax camporum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DI and PRD did not significantly decrease yield .
Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “these treatments did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1556 t0 “lemon Fino 49 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 e1 “DI and PRD decrease d stomatal conductance and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1501 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield .
Treatmenttraining to an espalier shape e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Qualifierwith and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.