View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Loss of seed treatments would decrease soybean yield through yield losses.
The loss of seed treatments e2 decrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The loss of seed treatments would result in yield losses to both corn and soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–285 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive nitrogen could decrease pod yield .
Excessive nitrogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive nitrogen,however,could decrease economic coefficient,and thus decreasing pod yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–614 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pruning caused a temporary decrease in total marigold yield during regeneration.
Verbatim
t0 “marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–109 e2 “the regeneration period following pruning led to a temporary decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–632 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A sugar cane yield decrease of 5% was inferred from the traffic data.
Verbatim
t0 “Tracking machinery to investigate the effect of compaction during sugar cane harvesting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e1 “a yield decrease of 5% was inferred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1184 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was associated with lower grain weight.
Yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield decrease was associated to a significant reduction in the number of grains per spike and in grain weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 t0 “different wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
UV-B and ABA decrease yield .
These treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “These treatments also hasten berry sugar and phenol accumulation, but reduce berry growth and sugar per berry at harvest, and therefore decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1654 t0 “grape berry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Keeping available water depletion below 25% produced no significant crop- yield decrease .
maintaining AWC depletion below 25% e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining AWC depletion below 25% resulted in no significant decrease in crop yield and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2257 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease correlated with high stem diameter and infestation.
stem diameter e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease of grain yield was correlated with high stem diameter, high infestation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–932 e1 “striped stem borer (Chilo suppressalis Walker) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–50 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease led to a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “leads to a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1041 t1 “cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 e2 “virulent bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens Conn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–229 e3 “the incubation period of the disease begins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–743 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxe2
Arachis hypogaea
Calendula officinalis
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Chilo suppressalis
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Solanum lycopersicum