Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE of wheat was 1.11 kg.m-3 under drought stress from anthesis to grain filling (I2), lower than under control.

Treatment
I2 - drought stress at the start of anthesis stagee2
Outcome
WUE meane1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
1.11e1
Qualifier
WUE mean was 1.27 kg.m-3e1
Comparator
control (I1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“For the purpose of studying the effects of water deficit stress on yield and water use efficiency of three wheat cultivars under field condition, an experiment was initiated in Research Farm of Islamic Azad University located in Kermanshah/Iran during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–261
e1

“Under control (I1) conditions, WUE mean was 1.27 kg.m-3 for all cultivars, but equal to 1.11, 0.91 and 0.73 kg.m-3 for stress treatments I2, I3, and I4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1475
e2

“I2 - drought stress at the start of anthesis stage ( 56 Zadoks) through the grain filling stage(70 Zadoks)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–655

Title

Effect of different irrigation regimes on yield and water use efficiency ofwinter wheat

Keyvan Shamsi; Soheil Kobraee Annals of biological research 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.

Taxon
timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrasse0
Outcome
IVDMDe2
Value
63 to 59%e2
Qualifier
Regrowth forage in the midsummer and fall harvestse2

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600
e2

“Regrowth forage in the midsummer and fall harvests averaged from 63 to 59% IVDMD and from 16 to 20% CP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–854

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.

Taxon
timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrasse0
Outcome
CPe2
Value
16 to 20%e2
Qualifier
Regrowth forage in the midsummer and fall harvestse2

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600
e2

“Regrowth forage in the midsummer and fall harvests averaged from 63 to 59% IVDMD and from 16 to 20% CP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–854

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture of phosphorus activation agent with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizer increased sugar beet income by 35.17% compared with the check.

Treatment
mixture phosphorus activation agent of soil with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizere4
Outcome
incomee6
Direction
increasede6
Value
35.17%e6
Comparator
checke3

Verbatim

e4

“The effect of the mixture phosphorus activation agent of soil with seedling bed fertilizer and field fertilizer was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–577
e0

“Obvious effects of increasing yield and income were obtained by applying phosphorus activation agent of soil in sugar beet with paper pot and field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147
e6

“the income increased by35.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–645
e3

“under pure quantity of P 2 O 5 in field fertilizer decrease d by21.74%than check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–725

Title

Analysis on effect of phosphorus activation agent of soil on sugar beet

Lijun Xia Zhongguo tangliao 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled haploid lines had an infestation score of 0.5-3.3, comparable with the standard (3.5).

Taxon
white head cabbagee0
Material
doubled haploid linese1
Interactor
Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee0pathogen
Outcome
score of infestatione2
Value
0.5-3.3e2
Comparator
the standarde2

Verbatim

e0

“Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor. is the one of the causative agent of disease of the family of Brassicaceae, that results in decrease of white head cabbage yield up to 10-60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171
e1

“the high disease distribution among doubled haploid lines was found (25- 100%), but disease development was not higher than 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–789
e2

“The score of infestation was 0.5-3.3, that was comparable with the standard (3.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–872

Title

VALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO PLASMODIOPHORA BRASSICAE OF HYBRID COMBINATIONS OF WHITE HEAD CABBAGE DEVELOPED BASED ON DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES

A. I. Mineikina; A. A. Ushakov; L. L. Bondareva VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA 2016. doi:10.18619/2072-9146-2016-2-90-93

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting phosphatic fertilizer in the new paddy field reduced total protein production per unit area compared with NPK plots.

Treatment
non-application plots of phosphatic fertilizere7
Outcome
total protein production per unit areae7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
N P K plotse7
Setting
new paddy field with great P-absorptive coefficiente7

Verbatim

t0

“Protein Content in Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40
e7

“in case of new paddy field with great P-absorptive coefficient, non-application plots of phosphatic fertilizer increased percent of protein by 20-30%compared with N P K plots, but these plots were accompanied remarkably by the decrease in grain yield, consequently reduced the total protein production per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2373

Title

Studies on Protein Content in Rice Grain : II. Effects of the fertilization on protein content and protein produtction in paddy grain

Kazuo HONJYO Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1971. doi:10.1626/jcs.40.190

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of shootse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
3–10%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of podse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
5–12%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
number of seedse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
13–18%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome
seed weighte4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
1–5%e4
Comparator
mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting
Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1

“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156
e4

“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.