View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528 t0 “BIOPOTATOES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
OSIRI did not significantly decrease sugarcane yield compared with the control method.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1172 t0 “OSIRI : a decision-marking tool for irrigation of sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–74 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
August 10 transplanting caused a drastic decrease in rice yield .
Treatmenttransplanting on August 10 e1 Directiondrastic decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “causing drastic decrease of rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–1986 e1 “transplanting on August 10 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1860 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease with more nitrogen.
Outcomeseed cotton yield and boll weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease as more N was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–827 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree density within fields tended to decrease crop yield .
Settinginside the fields e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “tree canopy cover and tree density inside the fields tended to decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield tended to decrease as sowing rates increased.
Treatmentincreasing sowing rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield was tending to decrease with increasing sowing rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1561 t0 “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield was stronger under the RCP8.5 scenario.
TreatmentRCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “Moreover, this decrease is stronger for the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Paclobutrazol caused no apparent decrease in fruit yield .
Directionno apparent decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The paclobutrazol treatment resulted in a 67.9% decrease in annual extension shoot growth compared to controls and no apparent decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–545 t0 “Nectarine Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–75 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Although some cultivars showed initial lower growth rates, crop yield did not decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Although some cultivars had shown initial signs of lower growth rates, there was no decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3034–3140 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relay cropping chili and watermelon showed no decrease in yield .
Verbatim
e0 “The relay cropping of chili and watermelon plants was effective simultaneously, and there was no decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1590 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.