Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled haploid lines had an infestation score of 0.5-3.3, comparable with the standard (3.5).

Taxon: white head cabbagee0
Material: doubled haploid linese1
Interactor: Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee0pathogen
Outcome: score of infestatione2
Value: 0.5-3.3e2
Comparator: the standarde2

Verbatim

e0
“Plasmodiophora brassicae Wor. is the one of the causative agent of disease of the family of Brassicaceae, that results in decrease of white head cabbage yield up to 10-60%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171

e1
“the high disease distribution among doubled haploid lines was found (25- 100%), but disease development was not higher than 68%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–789

e2
“The score of infestation was 0.5-3.3, that was comparable with the standard (3.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–872

Title

VALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO PLASMODIOPHORA BRASSICAE OF HYBRID COMBINATIONS OF WHITE HEAD CABBAGE DEVELOPED BASED ON DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES

A. I. Mineikina; A. A. Ushakov; L. L. Bondareva VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA 2016. doi:10.18619/2072-9146-2016-2-90-93

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of shootse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 3–10%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of podse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 5–12%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: number of seedse4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 13–18%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments reduced seed weight by 1–5% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume1
Treatment: herbicide treatmentse4
Outcome: seed weighte4
Direction: lowerinferrede4
Value: 1–5%e4
Comparator: mechanically weed-controlled plotse4
Setting: Szeged-Öthalom experimental areae1

Verbatim

e1
“effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Öthalom experimental area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–156

e4
“In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1972

Title

Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds

I. Kristó; M. Tar; V. J. Vojnich; et al. Advanced Agritechnologies 2019. doi:10.47414/na.7.2019.204790

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 15% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 45% fewer pods than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 58% fewer seeds than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots that did not control weeds had 49% lower seed weight than weed-free control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 3% fewer shoots per unit area than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 23% fewer pods than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 34% fewer seeds than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated only with pre-emergence herbicide had 35% lower seed weight than weed-free plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced plants per unit area by 1% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced shoots by 3–10% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced pods by 5–12% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments reduced seeds by 13–18% relative to mechanically weed-controlled plots.
Association Later sowing of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds.
Intervention effect Later-sown chickpea stock in 2018 gave higher yields than earlier-sown plots in 2019.
Association Yield is determined much more by field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating with the combination of LTR-2 and DnL1-1 gave a relative control efficacy of 67.73% on Fusarium crown rot of wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: combination of LTR-2 and DnL1-1e0
Interactor: Fusarium pseudograminearumFusarium pseudograminearume1pathogen
Second interactor: Trichoderma harzianum LTR-2Trichoderma harzianume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome: FCR diseasee0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 67.73%e0
Qualifier: Arthrobacter ureafaciens DnL1-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“wheat seeds coated with LTR-2 spore suspension and combination of LTR-2 and DnL1-1 had relative control efficacies of 50.77% and 67.73% on FCR disease, and increased wheat yield by 58.32% and 64.19%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–801

e1
“Fusarium pseudograminearum Fp (FP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–470

e2
“Trichoderma harzianum LTR-2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–181

e3
“Arthrobacter ureafaciens DnL1-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–217

Title

Effects of Trichoderma harzianum and Arthrobacter ureafaciens on control of Fusarium crown rot and microbial communities in wheat root-zone soil

Kai Yang; Hanxin Wang; Zhongjuan Zhao; et al. Phytopathology Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s42483-025-00331-7

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concurrent dhaincha with incorporation at 30 DAS suppressed weeds by 70% relative to rice alone.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae2
Treatment: Concurrent growing of dhaincha and its incorporation at 30 DASe1
Outcome: weed suppressione1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 70%e1
Comparator: Rice alonee3

Verbatim

e1
“Concurrent growing of dhaincha and its incorporation at 30 DAS resulted in a weed suppression of 70% with an yield enhancement to the tune of 0.840 t/ha and increased profitability of 12520/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–890

e2
“effect of concurrent growing of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) and its methods of incorporation on weed management in wet seeded rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–256

e3
“Rice alone with 5 t/ha FYM and recommended dose of 90-45-45 kg N-P-K/ha was taken as control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–696

Title

Concurrent growing of green manure with wet-seeded rice for cost-effective weed management

S. Anitha; Jose Mathew; C. T. Abraham Indian Journal of Weed Science 2012

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Concurrent dhaincha with incorporation at 30 DAS gave a yield enhancement of 0.840 t/ha relative to rice alone.
Intervention effect Concurrent dhaincha with incorporation at 30 DAS increased profitability relative to rice alone.
Association 2,4-D gave the maximum reduction of weeds without adverse effect on rice.
Association Nitrogen level had no significant influence on weed incidence in wet-seeded rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain B. thuringiensis B-5689 caused longer metamorphosis of the Colorado potato beetle than strain B-5351.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: B. thuringiensis B-5689e3
Interactor: Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae2pest
Outcome: metamorphosis processese3
Direction: longere3
Comparator: B. thuringiensis B-5351e3

Verbatim

t0
“Endophytic Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis for the Development of Means to Control Colorado Potato Beetle in Potato Crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123

e2
“reduced colonization of potato crops by the Colorado potato beetle, and also increased the yield of tubers in a 2-year experiment (2020–2021)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1227

e3
“Under the influence of B. thuringiensis B-5351, a decrease in the number of larvae of early age was observed, in contrast to B. thuringiensis B-5689, which caused longer metamorphosis processes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1422

Title

Endophytic Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis for the Development of Means to Control Colorado Potato Beetle in Potato Crops

A. V. Sorokan; G. V. Benkovskaya; I. S. Mardanshin; et al. Russian Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.3103/s1068367423070200

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fecundity per female decreased by 86.0% in the treated group.

Taxon: cowpeasVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment: treated groupe1
Interactor: Megalurothrips usitatusMegalurothrips usitatuse0pest
Outcome: Mean fecundity per femalee2
Direction: decreasede2
Value: 86.0%e2
Qualifier: from 247.15 ± 30.47 to 34.53 ± 6.02 eggse2
Comparator: water controle1

Verbatim

e0
“Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) is a major pest of cowpeas that severely affects their yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106

e1
“Compared with the water control, the F4 generation from the treated group exhibited significantly shortened 1st and 2nd instar nymphal durations, as well as the total egg-to-adult period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379

e2
“Mean fecundity per female decreased from 247.15 ± 30.47 to 34.53 ± 6.02 eggs (86.0% decrease)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1723

Title

Analysis of the Sublethal Effects of Spinetoram on Megalurothrips usitatus Across Multiple Generations Using the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Method

Rui Gong; Lifei Huang; Wenjie Huang; et al. Agriculture 2026. doi:10.3390/agriculture16111164

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect After three generations of LC25 stress, M. usitatus resistance to spinetoram reached a ratio of 2.7.
Intervention effect In the F4 generation from the treated group, the 1st and 2nd instar nymphal durations were significantly shortened.
Intervention effect In the F4 generation from the treated group, the prepupal duration was significantly prolonged.
Intervention effect Adult longevity in F4 females decreased by 32.1% in the treated group.
Intervention effect Adult longevity in F4 males decreased by 18.0% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The net reproductive rate R0 decreased by 89.5% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The intrinsic rate of increase r decreased by 40.0% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The finite rate of increase λ decreased by 10.1% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The mean generation time T was shortened by 13.2% in the treated group.
Intervention effect Age-stage-specific life expectancy was significantly reduced across all developmental stages in the treated group.
Intervention effect The peak age stage-specific reproductive value was significantly lower and occurred earlier in the treated group.
Intervention effect The peak values of the age-specific survival rate lx and of the fecundity fx and mx curves were significantly lower in the treated group.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The net reproductive rate R0 decreased by 89.5% in the treated group.

Taxon: cowpeasVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment: treated groupe1
Interactor: Megalurothrips usitatusMegalurothrips usitatuse0pest
Outcome: net reproductive rate (R0)e2
Direction: decreasede2
Value: 89.5%e2
Qualifier: from 98.80 ± 0.07 to 10.36 ± 0.01e2
Comparator: water controle1

Verbatim

e0
“Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) is a major pest of cowpeas that severely affects their yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106

e1
“Compared with the water control, the F4 generation from the treated group exhibited significantly shortened 1st and 2nd instar nymphal durations, as well as the total egg-to-adult period”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1379

e2
“the net reproductive rate (R0) decreased from 98.80 ± 0.07 to 10.36 ± 0.01 (89.5% decrease)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1849

Title

Analysis of the Sublethal Effects of Spinetoram on Megalurothrips usitatus Across Multiple Generations Using the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Method

Rui Gong; Lifei Huang; Wenjie Huang; et al. Agriculture 2026. doi:10.3390/agriculture16111164

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect After three generations of LC25 stress, M. usitatus resistance to spinetoram reached a ratio of 2.7.
Intervention effect In the F4 generation from the treated group, the 1st and 2nd instar nymphal durations were significantly shortened.
Intervention effect In the F4 generation from the treated group, the prepupal duration was significantly prolonged.
Intervention effect Adult longevity in F4 females decreased by 32.1% in the treated group.
Intervention effect Adult longevity in F4 males decreased by 18.0% in the treated group.
Intervention effect Mean fecundity per female decreased by 86.0% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The intrinsic rate of increase r decreased by 40.0% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The finite rate of increase λ decreased by 10.1% in the treated group.
Intervention effect The mean generation time T was shortened by 13.2% in the treated group.
Intervention effect Age-stage-specific life expectancy was significantly reduced across all developmental stages in the treated group.
Intervention effect The peak age stage-specific reproductive value was significantly lower and occurred earlier in the treated group.
Intervention effect The peak values of the age-specific survival rate lx and of the fecundity fx and mx curves were significantly lower in the treated group.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics