View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
low combined densities e0 do not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528 t0 “BIOPOTATOES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
pathogen inoculation e0 don’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide injury and defoliation interacted to decrease soybean yield .
herbicide injury and defoliation e3 interacted over 1990 and 1991 e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “seed yield of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–572 e3 “Moreover, herbicide injury and defoliation interacted over 1990 and 1991 to decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1297 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Loss of seed treatments would decrease corn yield through yield losses.
The loss of seed treatments e2 decrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The loss of seed treatments would result in yield losses to both corn and soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–285 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Loss of seed treatments would decrease soybean yield through yield losses.
The loss of seed treatments e2 decrease inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The loss of seed treatments would result in yield losses to both corn and soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–285 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil did not decrease mean yield of the three rice cultivars.
did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Bromoxynil did not decrease the average yield of any of the three cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931 t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napust0
Helianthus annuus
Solanum tuberosum
Phytophthora infestans
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Zea mays subsp. mays
Oryza sativa